INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: (latino vulgar)
From:
"R.P.S." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:18:51 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
>illos del
>quarte declination al secunde; FRUCTUS, nominativo plural, deveni *FRUCTI>
>FRUTTA/FRUCTOS,

Io credeva que le parolas evolveva ab le caso accusativo in tote le linguas
romance. Ma como es il possibile que "frutta" veni ab "*fructi"? -i>-a? E
non essera iste un de ille casos in que un parola neutre del secunde
declination usate in le plural (-a) es comprendite como un parola in
singular del prime declination (-a)? Ma non: "fructus" non es un parola
neutre del secunde declination in -um con plural in -a. Io non lo comprende.
Alicuno me lo pote explicar?


Rodrigo

______________________________
[log in to unmask] (MSN Messenger)
ICQ: 106542636
Bravenet Messenger: 3873986
______________________________
______________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2