INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 10 Nov 2001 11:39:04 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
STAN MULAIK wrote:

> I have been conducting further analyses of the reciprocal
> causation case and the notion of correlated errors.  I'm
> leaning now to the view that the covariance component C(u,v)
> between X3 and X4 is not a distinct parameter, but being a
> function of other parameters of the model, is taken into
> account by them.  So freeing up s(u,v) does not allow one
> to take C(u,v) into account.
>
> That undermines my previous argument for freeing up s(u,v).
>
> The nonrecursive case is fraught with complexities.

Multo impressionante. Io comprendeva vermente nihil! Qual falta
de education!

Cellus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2