INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Dumitrescu Cristian <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Sep 2002 22:47:01 -0700
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Non,
  Ni supratemporal ni intemporal, ben que Ensjo veni
con argumentos poetic.
  Le parola que non ha "connotationes" apud le
signification del "timeless" es ATEMPORAL. Como es jam
definite [a-] in interlingua.

Amicalmente,
  Cristian


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2