Kjell Rehnstrom ha scribite:

>In principio il sembla haber un mal tactica del adherentes de
>multe linguas auxiliar que illes ha troppo ingagiate se in
>polemicas con propagatores de altere linguas auxiliar in
>vice de propagar su lingua al publico.

Io non es de accordo con isto. Per exemplo, le propaganda de Interlingua inter
esperantistas pote esser multo efficace.
Io ha trovate un rimarca interessante:

 'Scratch an Interlinguist, and most often one found an ex-Esperantist who, craving a world language but frustrated by the artificiality of Zamenhof's creation, defected to Ido, then to Occidental, then to Interlingua, and would
continue to embrace ever more "natural" language schemes until
one of the real Romance languages [ forsan Romanica? S. B.] was simply re-invented and declared the new world language'
http://www.homunculus.com/babel/ainterlingua.html

Amicalmente,

Semen Blagov