INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:04:39 +0200
Reply-To:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Peter Kleiweg <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
Alfa-Informatica, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (25 lines)
Daniele Nicolucci (Jollino) scribeva:

> > Le orthographia de anglese es effective, con systema logic.
>
> ...ma non super isto! :)
> Le orthographia de anglese pote esser toto ma non logic! Un
> orthographia logic es un orthographia in le qual le mesme gruppos de
> litteras ha le mesme sonos

Tu parla de un desiro pro simplicitate. Ma un systema logic non
debe esser simple.

> In anglese, on sovente debe vider le diccionario pro conocer le
> pronunciation correcte de parolas (e le facto que vocabularios anglese
> porta le pronunciation es indicative del complexitate...).

Le pronunciation de anglese non es simple. Non blasma lo a le
orthographia. Scriptura non es linguage parlate.

http://www.xs4all.nl/~pkleiweg/argilla/2004a/010.html

--
Peter Kleiweg
http://www.let.rug.nl/~kleiweg/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2