INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 May 2005 20:54:12 +0000
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Reply-To:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Car Jasef,

Non, la phrase de Allan vole star in subjunctivo (modo de illo que es
possibile in le futuro) e non in presente de indicativo (modo de illo que es
jam regrettabilemente objectivate e avantia verso su destruction in le
preterito/passato).

Vincemos o morimos

non vole dicer:

Vinceamos aut moriamos.

Usque a la victoria semper!

Que victoria?

"Vincemos o morimos" solo pote esser dicte per un quasi cadaver.

"Vinceamos aut moriamos" per un idiota militarista,

Et "Vel vinceamos vel perdeamos... viveamos, et bibeamos con moderation"
solo pote exir ab la bucca de un esser intelligente.

Victoria? Qual victoria?

Viva la vita!

Josu Lavin
********

ATOM RSS1 RSS2