LISTSERV - INTERLNG Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	INTERLNG Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Curiositate... sexual (contento prohibite al minores de 18annos :P)
From:	Ado Hall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:13:45 +1100
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (28 lines)

Si, ma le 'ou' francese representa le sono 'u'. Pro exemplo, L gutta,
bucca > fr goutte, bouche

Edo

On 1/11/07, Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 1/10/07, Emerson S Costa <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > PT foder ( < basse-LA futere < LA futuere )
> > ES joder
> > IT fottere
> > FR foutre
> >
> > Piet Cleij ha includite "futuer" in su dictionario
> > interlingua-nederlandese.
> >
> > Necun de iste linguas romance retene le "u". Deberea le prototypo esser le
> > forma non classic "futer"?
> >
>
> Poterea esser "foter", non? Pt, it e fr contine "o" e "t", mais non contine "u".
>
> Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues
>

--
Archivos e disabonar: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/INTERLNG.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG