LISTSERV - INTERLNG Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	INTERLNG Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Le explication de Gode pro le particulas in [ ] in le IED
From:	Paul Gideon Dann <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:15:23 +0100
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (37 lines)

On Wednesday 02 Apr 2014 13:22:26 Ruud Harmsen wrote:
> 11:11 2-4-2014, Paul Gideon Dann:
> >Potesser Ruud esseva demendante si il habeva un parola
> >prototypic pro "yes"?
> 
> Yet? Non, pro 'still', in le senso de "continuing now or in the
> future as in the past" o "up to this or that time; yet".
> http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/still

Si, "yes" => "yet". Pardono me pro le error typographic :p

> >Tu ha
> >explicate que il non ha un tal parola in le IED, mais io vide le
> >sequente in tu lista de particulas:
> >
> >ancora adj/conj < LL ancoram < ad hanc horam
> >E still, (encore)
> >F encore
> >I ancora
> >S todavia
> >P mais
> 
> Anque, e melior: ainda (portugese antiqua e popular, anque: inda).

Stan Mulaik => Debe tu corriger tu lista de particulas pro le sequente edition de tu libro?

> 
> >C/O encara/ancar
> >R înca

Paul


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG