LISTSERV - INTERLNG Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	INTERLNG Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Limitationes in evidentia linguistic
From:	Martijn Dekker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Mon, 1 Sep 2008 00:08:52 +0200
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (18 lines)

At 21:19 +0200 31-08-2008, cleij wrote:
>Io ha un question. Tu scribe que "interferer" in le IED es
>un error. Proque un error? Le verbo "interferer" (non
>"interferir") produce; interferente, interferentia, interferential:
>sono interferente, colores de interferentia, filtro interferential.

Exactemente, isto face de "interferer" un parola de stilo classic
(non romance) como explicate in "Forms of international words in
derivational series" in le introduction del IED, similar a p.ex.
"tempore" (de "temporari", etc.), "oculo" (de "ocular", "oculista") e
"audir" (de "audientia").

- Martijn, qui es troppo occupate al momento pro responder a altere
cosas que attende ancora responsa; mi excusas pro le retardo.

--
Archivos e disabonar: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/INTERLNG.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG