LISTSERV - INTERLNG Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	INTERLNG Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Le explication de Gode pro le particulas in [ ] in le IED
From:	Ruud Harmsen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:22:26 +0200
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (32 lines)

11:11 2-4-2014, Paul Gideon Dann:
>Potesser Ruud esseva demendante si il habeva un parola 
>prototypic pro "yes"?

Yet? Non, pro 'still', in le senso de "continuing now or in the 
future as in the past" o "up to this or that time; yet". 
http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/still

>Tu ha
>explicate que il non ha un tal parola in le IED, mais io vide le 
>sequente in tu lista de particulas:
>
>ancora adj/conj < LL ancoram < ad hanc horam
>E still, (encore)
>F encore
>I ancora
>S todavia
>P mais

Anque, e melior: ainda (portugese antiqua e popular, anque: inda).

>C/O encara/ancar
>R înca

-- 
Ruud Harmsen, http://rudhar.com


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG