INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Aug 2013 16:35:35 -0600
Reply-To:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
In iste modo le Interlingua original (interlingua de Peano) es multo
superior - on non pote disputa ad infinitum supra que es Interlingua e que
non es: parolas latin es Interlingua. Ma io pensa que Interlingua de Peano
ha besonia de un poco plus de flexion, forsan casos grammatical (ma
regular) o le articulo definite, pro evitar ambiguitate.


2013/8/2 Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

> Le question es si il non es melior
> retornar al latino classic. In ille
> caso on al minus ha un certe
> acceptantia que cosa es bon
> linguage e gue cosa non, e il ha un
> salubre dicotomia inter academia e
> le uso popular.
>
> Kjell R
>
>
> --
> Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
> http://listserv.icors.org/**archives/interlng.html<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html>
>



-- 
http://www.pagef30.com


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2