INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ruud Harmsen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:28:13 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
20:06 14-11-2015, Ferdinand Cesarano:
>In plus, le pronomine objective debe sider ante, non post, un 
>conjugate
>verbo simple.

[Sider? Seder? Star? Esser?]

Le regular es un poco plus complicate: vide §67 usque §73. In §73 
toto es relativate:
==
Le placia de pronomines in le phrase non es rigidemente fixate. 
Le paragraphos precedente describe le norma del qual deviationes 
es justificate per considerationes de rhythmo o emphase.
==

>In plus...nu, isto suffice.
>
>(Io sape que "nu" es un Esperantismo. Ma il manca un parola 
>Interlinguan
>que pote convenibilemente exprimer mi exasperation.)

Ben. Ora.
-- 
Ruud Harmsen, http://rudhar.com


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2