INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:09:48 +0200
Reply-To:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Micre? Parve?
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
From:
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines) 
Den 2016-06-17 kl. 00:15, skrev 
Ruud Harmsen:
> http://jdr.sagepub.com/content/45/5/1499.abstract.fr
> ==
> In un micre compartimento le proportion del existente grande superficie con le micre volumine pare esser un obstaculo pro le alteration o le protection del parietes continente si un transporto de massa non occurre frequentemente.
In le svedese manual de interlingua 
per Ingvar Stenström le parolas 
novem = 9 e micre e parve existe. 
Ego veniva in contacto con 
interlingua plus o minus in 1970 e 
plus tarde ego habeva contacto con 
le movimento de interlingua in 
Svedia. Ingvar qui lege iste lista 
certemente sape quande on 
introduceva novem pro 9 e micre = 
parve. Micre sembla esser un multo 
probabile cambio in le lingua.

Kjell R


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2