INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Anne Burgi <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 17 Jan 1998 21:08:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Steinar Midtskogen wrote:

>
> Hm.  Si interlingua era un lingua inflectite, il serea nulle problema.
> Adjectivos semper concorda con le substantivo, adverbios son
> indeclinable.
>
> I.e. in lingua latin il ha nulle dubita:
>
>      Adjectivo               Adverbio
>  Sol clarus lucet        Sol clare lucet
>  Soles clari lucent      Soles clare lucent
>  Luna clara lucet        Luna clare lucet
>  Lunae clarae lucent     Lunae clare lucent
>  Aurum clarum lucet      Aurum clare lucet
>  Aura clara lucent       Aura clare lucent
>
> Pauc inflectiones non semper es le mesme como plus facile!
>

Eh, eh! Steinar... pro  ANALYSAR  un lingua, tu ha totalmente ration...
ma pro APPRENDER  un lingua, le sol pensata del flexiones latin me face
mal de testa! Io prefere interlingua!

Pigremente,

Anne

ATOM RSS1 RSS2