INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ruud Harmsen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:31:54 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
>Paul Dann skrev 2014-03-13 19:02:
>>Satis! Isto non es qualcosa utile a dicer! Per favori, limita 
>>tu a cosas que es constructive!

10:12 14-3-2014, Kjell Rehnström:
>In le mundo de linguas auxiliar
>isto es un ubiquitose fenomeno. Le
>lingua ido es un eloquente exemplo
>de como on pote frenar le evolution
>de un lingua per le adjuta de
>sempre e sempre nove reformas e
>questionar del decisiones del
>antecedente usatores.

Esperanto II es un altere ma minus note exemplo. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto_II . Illo habeva le 
advantage de poter ser scribite solmente in ASCII (que tunc non 
ja existeva, ma le alphabeto si).

Postea, proponitor René de Saussure affiliava se con le IALA mais 
non viveva satis longe pro vider le nascentia e maturitate de 
interlingua. Il ha plus personas de fama qui contribueva a 
diverse linguas auxiliar e ultimatemente adhereva interlingua. Un 
exemplo: Ric Berger, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ric_Berger:
==
In 1912, at the age of 18, he became interested in universal 
languages as an Esperantist. He changed to Ido in 1918 and to 
Occidental in 1928. He was co-editor of the Occidental magazine 
"Cosmoglotta" from 1934 to 1950, and he was responsible for 
changing the name of the language to Interlingue in 1949.[1] 
Finally, in 1956, he took an interest in Interlingua.
==
Dunque ille vadeva de esperanto via ido e occidental, que ille 
renominava interlingue, a interlingua

Io mesmo non es de fama ma vadeva de esperanto a interlingua in 
le qual io va persister.






>Ora, interlingua ha su principios e
>il es recommendabile que on los seque.
>
>On pote naturalmente amplificar le
>base, introducer alcun plus de
>linguas, ma isto non cambia multo,
>e tal discussiones in mi opinion
>non appertine a iste lista. Ego
>recommenda que on funda un lista:
>Interlingua meliorate secundo le
>principios de Stan Mulaik. Il es un
>plenmente legitime discussion, ma
>non ci.
>
>Kjell R
>
>
>--
>Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
>http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

-- 
Ruud Harmsen, http://rudhar.com


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2