LISTSERV - INTERLNG Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	INTERLNG Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Grammar And Method
From:	Paul Gideon Dann <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:49:21 +0000
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (19 lines)

On Tuesday 18 Feb 2014 15:11:24 Ruud Harmsen wrote:
> Yes, but then the _perfect_ tenses express the _non-perfect_ (not
> completed, continuous) aspect! That is extremely confusing for
me
> (also because in Dutch, we don't necessarily use our perfecto
> composto that way).

Memora que il ha un differentia importante inter un *tempore
perfecto* e le *aspecto perfective*:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_aspect

Paul


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG