INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua
Date:
Sat, 9 Mar 2002 18:17:42 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
"Stėphane Larochelle" wrote:

> (...)
> Interlingua then has no pretention of becoming
> everybody`s second language, and just wants to remain
> a reference language. So I find the only solution to
> solve the human communication problem must then be
> esperanto or Ido.
>
> Thank you for your help

Infelicemente on non pote attinger le destinatario. Le
interessante cosa es que le aspirationes de esperanto, ido
o interlingua es satis sin interesse sub le condition que
le linguas in question non pote attinger los.

Personalmente ego vide le avantage de interlingua jacer in
isto que illes qui pote usar le lingua pote usar lo. Qual
adjuta ha ego de communicar con un persona qui promitte
apprender esperanto e non ha le capacitate facer lo? In
isto io prefere comunicar con personas qui comprende
interlingua, qui ha provate que illes lo comprende. Mi
problema non es leger e comprender, mi problema es scriber
le altere grande linguas occidental, e per interlingua io
ha un exito, lingua mundial o non.

Cellus P.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2