INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua
Date:
Sat, 1 Sep 2001 15:48:12 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 02:36:00AM +1000, Sergey Belitzky wrote:
> Anque re 'y'-'e' pro "and" : le son 'e' es tre aperte e
> "agglutinabile" In contrari le son 'y'(or 'i') es plus clause e
> per consequente il es plus "disunibile". 'Y' es plus apte (IMHO).
>
> Pro International Lingua nunc es tempor pro "colliger petras"
> ma non pro "disjacular". Nunc non es tempor pro excluder
> []-parolas ex IED-51. E forsan in contrari.

Vole acceptar iste correctiones:
tre -> multo
son -> sono
tempor -> tempore
in contrari -> al contrario

--
Saluti,
    Mardy
http://www.interlingua.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2