INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Emerson S Costa/RF02/SRF <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua
Date:
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:10:24 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Peter Kleiweg scribeva:
>Tu parla de un desiro pro simplicitate.
>Ma un systema logic non debe esser simple.

Io comprende lo que tu vole dicer. Malgrado le complexitate (muuulte
regulas implicite que uno apprende con le practica) es possibile deducer le
pronunciation correcte del majoritate del parolas anglese a partir del
parola scripte. Totevia il ha pronunciationes que necun logica explica.

(Pronunciationes in SAMPA: <http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/sampa/home.htm>)

* "gauge" = [geIdZ] in vice de [gO:dZ]
* "women" = ["wIm@n] in vice de ["wu:m@n]
* "laugh" = [lAf] o [l{f] in vice de [lO:]
* "house" = [haUs] (subst.) e [haUz] (verbo)
* "deliberate" = [dI"lIb@rIt] (adj.) e [dIlIb@"reIt] (verbo)
* "read" = [rI:d] (infinitivo/presente) e [red] (participio)
* etc.

Durante multe tempore io era insecur si le parola "image" debeva esser
legite ["Im@dZ], [I"meIdZ] o [aI"meIdZ]. :-)

A revider,
Ensjo.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2