INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
jasef harb <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua
Date:
Thu, 5 May 2005 09:25:38 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Io es de accordo con Barbara io pensa que on no debe standarizar le linguas Europee
Nacion, Nation
Historia, istoria , histoire ETC....

Cata lingua ha su charme que le face interessante al public

Lo que io pensa que Josu vole dicer es que vermente Europe ha besonio de un lingua poncte que sia union neutre pro omnes. E in iste io es de accordo sed non de remplaciar le linguas nationales.

Unite in le diversitate

Europeemente

Jsf


Barbara <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
--- In [log in to unmask], Josu Lavin
scribeva:
Scriber NACIÓN, FILOSOFÍA, TEATRO, etc. in espaniol in vice de NATION,
PHILOSOPHIA, THEATRO, etc. es ager antieuropeemente!


Io non es de accordo. Forsan antilatinemente ma non antieuropeemente.
P.ex in polonese on scribe "nacja, filozofia, teatr", in
svedese "nation, filosofi, teater", in romaniano "teatru" in
italiano "nazione, filosofia, teatro" etc

europeemente
Barbara


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
 Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour

ATOM RSS1 RSS2