INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stanley Mulaik <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:25:10 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 14:11:20 -0500, Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Le 15 novembre 2015, Stanley Mulaik scribeva (extracto):
>
>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:39:57 +0100, Ruud Harmsen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>> Non plus. Interlingua es hodie un lingua "in its own right". (in
>>> su proprie derecto? anglicismo?)
>>
>> Mais il es ora un lingua de circa 550 personas.  Grande
>> communitate, nonne?
>
>Si interlingua es le joculo de un tal minuscule communitate, proque tu
>concerne te ipse?

Proque io crede que interlingua es un rendition objective de un commun hereditage
lexic e linguistic del linguas de europa, basate super le usage de circa 800.000.000+
personas.  Essente un rendition objective de un hereditage commun, io pensarea 
que le politicos e educatores e pedagogos europee viderea interlingua como lore
lingua commun e introducer lo in le scholas de Europa.

Io non haberea le mesme interesse in le caso de klingon.
>--
>Paul Bartlett

Amicalmente,

Stan Mulaik


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2