LISTSERV - INTERLNG Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	INTERLNG Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: sisypho
From:	Ruud Harmsen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Sun, 4 May 2014 13:49:06 +0200
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (29 lines)

11:34 4-5-2014, Stanley Mulaik:
>F. cime, Esp. cima,  I. cima, P. cima  < lat. cyma
>
>Solmente le anglese ha formas in 'cym-', 'cyma', e un variante
>in un lingua non pote influentiar le prototypo con un
>characteristica
>unic a illo. De plus iste formas anglese non ha le senso de 'cima',
>que es 'top' o 'end'

Le original esseva grec e probabilemente es cognate con cumular,
cumulative, cumulation etc.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cima#Etymology_2
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cyma#Latin
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%CE%BA%E1%BF%A6%CE%BC%CE%B1#Ancient_Greek

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cumulate#Etymology
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cumulus#Latin

Ergo le idea fundamental es 'inflar'.

--
Ruud Harmsen, http://rudhar.com


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG