Ecce un conversatino de Auxlang re le nove sito interlingua.com...

Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>
> To: List AUXLANG <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Revised language page(s)
> Date: Sunday, September 14, 1997 7:56 PM
>
> [log in to unmask] [log in to unmask]
>  http://adam.cheshire.net/~jjbowks/home.html
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  ahum ahum ahum,
> People, it's Castellina, Paolo Castellina. Not Castellini...
>
> Paolo Castellina
> CH-7604 Borgonovo (Switzerland)
> Tel. (++41,81)8221145
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.geocities.com/~pcastellina
> --Actually it is Paolo that we have to thank for the Interlingua
> Official site, actually the UMI (Union Mundial pro Interlingua)
> he's the main programmer and webmaster.-
>
> Also, Paolo and a lot of other Interlinguanos have given up on
> CompuServe and obtained local ISP's, so all links to CompuServe
> sites are outdated and the pages cannot be updated. The Interlingua
> official site is updated with the latest, such as the Strasbourg
> Conference news, etc.
>
> Feel free to request any info on the new official site, whatever
> I don't know I'll cross post to INTERLNG and get you an answer.
>
> Fair enough, no?
>
> Since,
> Jay B.
> -------
> > From: Don HARLOW <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: Multiple recipients of list AUXLANG <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Revised language page(s)
> > Date: Sunday, September 14, 1997 1:55 PM
> >
> > Skribis Bruce GILSON:
> >
> > > For some reason, posts are not coming to me in order. I saw James
> > > Chandler's response to Ensjo's post before the original.
> > >
> > Not an uncommon problem. It's happened to me in the past -- might be
> > associated with routing of packets. Or so I would guess.
> >
> > > So, do I go with Castellini's link (the only Interlingua presence on
> > > the Web that was known to me)? Or the "official" page, which James
> > > thinks is still not ready for consumption?
> > >
> > I looked at the "official" page yesterday. It looks a bit cluttered,
> > but the same can be said of many other such pages (my
> > "esperanto.html", for instance). Also, it's not particularly new; I
> > saw it before, a couple of months ago, and even found that I'd
> > entered it back then on my "conlang.html" page, and had then
> > forgotten. I doubt whether it's going to become significantly more
> > "ready" in the next few months, if it hasn't in the past two or
> > three.
> >
> > Is there a reason why you don't want to include _both_ pages? That
> > would seem to be a reasonable solution. Castellini's obviously has
> > precedence, but the other presumably represents an official
> > organization.
> > -- Don HARLOW
> > http://www.webcom.com/~donh/
> > (English version at http://www.webcom.com/~donh/dona.html)