Den 2015-11-28 kl. 11:28, skrev 
Ruud Harmsen:
> 19:14 27-11-2015, Paul Bartlett:
>> [...] Vide mi essayo
>> (anglesemente) "Thoughts on IAL 
>> SUccess"
>> http://www.panix.com/~bartlett/thoughts.html 
>> . Iste re es plus
>> importantissime que le theorias 
>> original de Gode e le IALA.
>
> "and endless tinkering to strive 
> ever closer to a supposed 
> "perfection" may actually impede 
> use of any conIAL."
>
> Very true. Multo ver.
>
> (Mi interlingua pro le citation 
> in anglese:
> Sin fin rectificar e readjustar 
> un lingua, per attinger un 
> perfection supposticie, pote de 
> facto impedir le uso de ulle 
> lingua auxiliar constructe.)
>
> «Would-be learners and users 
> always find the ground shifting 
> under their feet with a language 
> subject to endless tinkering and 
> supposed "improvements." »
>
> Right.
>
> (But admittedly, most of what I 
> write in Interlingua myself, is 
> ABOUT Interlingua, or other 
> languages.)
>
Isto non es tanto estranie. Secundo 
linguistas il occurre plus de 
deliberationes pri le linguage in 
gruppos ubi il non ha native 
parolatores. In un gruppo ubi omnes 
es native parlatores il ha multo 
poc deliberationes consernente le 
lingua ipse.

Kjell R


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html