Amicas e amicos!
Nunc io ha recipite omne messages que era retardate, etiam illo que era
"perdite". Sia iste difficultates temporari.
Nostre jornal esser haber 100 annos hodie e nos ha un grande festa in
le Domo de Finlandia. Duo presidentes attende, le presidente del Republica
Finlandia Martti Ahtisaari, avec, e le presidente del Association Finlandese
pro
Interlingua Allan Kiviaho, etiam avec.
Io obteneva un meraviliose horologia de auro.
Ciao!
Allan

"Ensjo (Emerson José Silveira da Costa)" wrote:

> De facto il ha alcun problema in le servitor MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU,
> que serve le listas INTERLNG e IL_STRAT.
>
> Io invia annexate un message del lista SJUOWNER (dedicate a
> discussiones super le administration del listas hospitate in
> MAELSTROM), ubi on explica le (o suppone un causa del) problema.
>
> Io verificava messages posterior de SJUOWNER, ma necun message declara
> que le problema ha essite solvite.
>
> Vamos attender.
>
> Ensjo.
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: server problems?
> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 10:40:40 -0500
> From: Paul Karagianis <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Owners of lists on MAELSTROM <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> On 9 Nov 98, at 16:07, Janet Estes wrote:
> >
> >Just wondering if St John's is having problems today? Our list mail is
> >moving really sloooooowly.
>
> St. John's is aware that there were delays in its networks that had a
> negative impact on Maelstrom.  The Network guys currently feel that this
> was due to _inbound_ traffic generated by the students / SJU community
> that saturated some communications gear that's also used by Maelstrom.
> They're looking into it.  The problem can be seen quite clearly by
> going to the Maelstrom home page and selecting "Mail delivery statistics".
> If you overstrike the "stats-today.html" with an absolute date like last
> Mondays:
>
> http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/lsmtp-stats/1998/stats-1102.html
>
> ...you can see that the system is under moderate load at worst, but
> taking horrendously longer to actually get the stuff out.  (Assuming I
> didn't blow the URL for the third time in a row).
>
>                                                    -Kary