INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 21 Nov 1998 23:50:15 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
Iste message hic infra in anglese esseva
un "forward" del lista Occidental conducite
per Bob P., in ille liste Bob continua a facer
mention negative de usatores de Interlingua
que secun ille misrepresenta le Occidental
e que refusa corriger lor errores in le paginas
que existe al Tela Trans Terrestre. Le unic
vice que ille me petiva corriger info esseva,
io crede, le paragrapho quotate al pagina
in re Occidental scribite per A. Gode. In ille
paragrapho le Senior Gode presenta le
valor de Occidental e monstra alcun de
su formas illogic o difficile a usar.

Il es mi impression que Bob P. solmente
es interessate in defamar le Interlingua e
voler obtiner lucro del effortios de un
imminente interlinguista como De Wahl, e
le magazine Cos. que le Occicentalistas
publicava. Pro demonstrar per favor lege
le message hic infra de ille...

sincermente,
Jay B.

-----Original Message-----
 Subject: Information and there is information.
 To: [log in to unmask]
 ...
There are four known sites now with information about Occidental that
 is in total error. Yet, these folks refuse to correct these errors,
 and they seem to believe that they are true. They prefer to leave
 this information uncorrected because someone who was an opponent of
 Occidental did not understand it, wrote incorrect information about
 it, and deliberately misquoted statements in the Kos jurnals, and now
 people read those things, even folks now beginning to learn about
 Occidental, and they think they are true. They are not, and are
 deliberate misrepresentations.
 Why do people continue to preserve such stuff, and even to believe
 them, when they are shown from the actual material that these are
 deliberate, and obvious misstatements? They can see with their own
 eyes that these quotes were distorted by reading the actual quotes
 themselves, yet they prefer to defend the distortions and twistings.
...
 So, think about it, and do the right thing because it is the right
 thing to do. I am not interested in giving away valuable material for
 no reason at all. ...
 Bob

ATOM RSS1 RSS2