LISTSERV - INTERLNG Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	INTERLNG Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Es interlingua troppo etymologic?
From:	Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:15:33 +0100
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (30 lines)

Den 2007-03-16 17:11:35 skrev Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues  
<[log in to unmask]>:

> On 3/16/07, Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Le cello que inquieta Stan tanto era un proba logicamente usr le
>> correspondente forma pro "celle" pro "ille". Tanto como quando Stan et.
>> al. scribe "mais" e on pensa del plantas! Difficile. Io face Stan pensar
>> de stradevarios e ille face me pensar de viveres. Difficile!
>>
>
> Il ha nule regula in le metodologia de IALA que establi le proibition
> al existentia de homonimos. Tunc tu argumento es fragile.
>
> Antonielly Garca Rodrigues
>
Tu ha totalmente ration. Mi intention era plus tosto jocar un poco. Tu ha  
naturalmente un multitude de homofonos in interlngua como "la" in le  
signification "ibi" e "la" omo le articulo o un pronomine del 3 persona in  
forma objecto.

Io la cognosce. Illa non es la.

Kjell R

-- 
Använder Operas banbrytande e-postklient: http://www.opera.com/mail/

--
Archivos e disabonar: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/INTERLNG.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG