INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sergey Belitzky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sergey Belitzky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 14:30:36 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Salute Cellus,

[06.09.2001, 5:23], tu scribite:


KR> Si tu non ha un dictionario de interlingua a tu disposition tu debe
KR> crear verbos e altere parolas secundo le medios a tu disposition.
Yo habe alicun dictionarios ( forsan errorosi ma tamen mie )
KR> Naturalmente verbos in interlingua como altere linguas occidental ha
KR> si non aspectos al minus species de action. Sed iste species de
KR> action non se expressa in le verbos ipse sed es un function lexical.
Como tu pensa: es isto ben por international lingua rationale?
An tu place le forma 'habeva scribite' melor como p. ex. 'scribit'? Or
tal forma es mal compresibile? Esque GI-51 es reliquia intoccabile
como "Fundamento" de Zamenhof? Le questiones era rhethorical. :)

Cordialmente,
Sergius


[][][][][][][][] mailto:[log in to unmask] [][][][][][][][]
[][][][][][] DICTIONARIOS PRO BABYLON [][][][][][][]
http://info.babylon.com/glossaries/445D/English___Interlingue_dictiona.BGL
http://info.babylon.com/glossaries/4116/Interlingua___Russo.BGL
http://inter-lingua.narod.ru/files/CEID.bgl
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]
[]           http://occidental.narod.ru           []
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2