Hic un question del lista Auxlang, si alcun de nostre membros con plus experientia pote inviar information in re le Occidental e como le Occidentalistas/Interlingueistas deveniva membros del movimento pro Interlingua il esserea un adjuta multo appreciate. Hic le question de Bob... > >Now. I have been reading most of the discussion on Novialoids. However, >since I just found the German book on Occidental, and an Occidental >dictionary with ten languages, I have become curious about Occidental. If I >understand correctly, even J. at one time seemed to like Occidental. What >was "wrong" with Occidental, if that is the way to say it, and why did it >not supercede Novial? Was it internal deficiencies, politics, timing, or? >Does anyone have an opinion or experience on this? > >Mil gra, >Bob > Ille vole saper pro que le movimento pro Occidental non progressava e ille crede que Novial lo supercedeva... mais le veritate del situation esseva que le Occidental existeva al minus in forma scripte pro medio del Cosmoglotta usque le annos sexanta, nonne? E multos del membros del movimento pro Interlingue/Occidental deveniva adherentes del Interlingua de IALA. Nos ha varie hic al lista INTERLNG que esseva Occidentalista in su juvene annos. Si vos pote facer un responsa educate per favor invia le information a Interlng e io lo passara al lista Auxlang. Gratias, Jay B. -- [log in to unmask] [log in to unmask] http://adam.cheshire.net/~jjbowks/index.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -----Original Message----- From: Robert J. Petry <[log in to unmask]> To: Multiple recipients of list AUXLANG <[log in to unmask]> Date: Saturday, March 28, 1998 2:13 PM Subject: Re: my project >James Chandler wrote: > >> > >[kut] > >> Everything I am deciding is being done in public anyway. Bruce is not >> gaining much by hearing the discussions on Auxlang, as soon it will >> all be posted on my site. Let everything go into the public domain. >> If you see anything you like in my shop window, please take it and use >> it: that's what it's there for. [kut] > >Great, looking forward to the "final" info. > >Now. I have been reading most of the discussion on Novialoids. However, >since I just found the German book on Occidental, and an Occidental >dictionary with ten languages, I have become curious about Occidental. If I >understand correctly, even J. at one time seemed to like Occidental. What >was "wrong" with Occidental, if that is the way to say it, and why did it >not supercede Novial? Was it internal deficiencies, politics, timing, or? >Does anyone have an opinion or experience on this? > >Mil gra, >Bob >