GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Momodou Camara <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Jul 2000 12:07:17 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (161 lines)
       Copyright 2000 InterPress Service, all rights reserved.
          Worldwide distribution via the APC networks.

                      *** 20-Jul-0* ***

Title: G7/8 SUMMIT: Japan Asked To Implement Anti-Corruption
Convention

By Ramesh Jaura

BONN, Jul 20 (IPS) - The global watchdog, Transparency
International (TI), has asked Japan to implement the Anti-
Corruption Convention, and deplored a small group of countries
holding back its effective functioning.

The Berlin-based TI's appeal came in the run-up to the summit
meeting of the seven major industrial nations - and Russia - in
Okinawa, Friday to Sunday.

In a statement forwarded to IPS Thursday, Transparency's chair,
Peter Eigen, said: ''The G8-summit in Japan must squarely address
the issue of corruption and urge their summit host, Japan, to
fully implement the landmark OECD Anti-Bribery Convention.''

Japan is among a small group of G7-countries lagging behind in
the process of translating the OECD Convention into adequate
domestic law.

The Convention requires signatories to make it a crime to bribe
foreign officials.

The seven countries - Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Canada,
the United States and Japan - are economic and political
heavyweights in the 29-member Organisation for Economic Co-
operation and Development, based in Paris.

Eigen said: ''Corruption will be high on the agenda of the
summit...But the G8 summit must not remain silent on the fact that
four of the participants - Italy, France and the United Kingdom as
well as Japan - can be seen as effectively blocking full
implementation of the OECD Convention.''

The OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public
Officials in International Business Transactions, went into effect
on February 15 last year - nearly two years after it was signed by
all 20 OECD member countries and five non-members - Argentina,
Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile and the Slovak Republic.

All signatories committed themselves to ensuring that their
national parliaments approve the Convention and pass legislation
necessary for its ratification and implementation into national
law.

The Convention makes it a crime to offer, promise or give a
bribe to a foreign public official in order to obtain or retain
international business deals.

A related text effectively puts an end to the practice of
according tax deductibility for bribe payments made to foreign
officials.

The Convention commits 34 signatory countries, including all
the world's biggest economies, to adopt common rules to punish
companies and individuals who engage in bribery transactions.

So far, 21 countries have been subjected to close monitoring to
determine the adequacy of their implementing legislation.

These include Austria, Australia, Belgium, Britain, Bulgaria,
Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hungary,
Iceland, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Norway, the Slovak Republic,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the US.

For each country reviewed, the Working Group on Bribery has
adopted a report, including an evaluation, which was published on
June 27.

The report noted that Japan had signed the Convention on
December 17, 1997, and deposited the instrument of acceptance
with the OECD on October 13, 1998.

On September 18, 1998, it enacted implementing legislation in
the form of amendments to the Unfair Competition Prevention Law,
which came into force on February 15, 1999.

According to the OECD report, the amendments to the Unfair
Competition Prevention Law establish the offence of bribing a
foreign public official, define ''foreign public official'' and
provide sanctions.

Other existing laws, including the Penal Code, the Code of
Criminal Procedure and the Commercial Code contain provisions
relevant to the other obligations under the Convention.

The Japanese authorities explained to the OECD working group
that the foreign bribery offence was placed in the Unfair
Competition Prevention Law as opposed to the Penal Code, which
contains the domestic bribery offences, because the foreign
bribery offence has a different objective.

The report added: ''The objective of the domestic offences (in
Japan) is to maintain public trust in a fair and honest public
service.''

''On the other hand, the foreign offence is aimed at ensuring
fair competition in international business transactions. Japan
believes it is therefore reasonable to implement the Convention
through amendments to the Unfair Competition Prevention Law.''

Eigen said: ''The OECD Convention is the most powerful tool to
achieve lasting progress in curbing a plight that has devastated
economies all around the globe.''

The Convention - negotiated and brought into effect in record
time - makes it a crime in the home country of a company to make
bribe payments abroad.

Yet, the working mechanism of the Convention rests on the basic
assumption that the same rules will apply to all major exporters.

''This makes it all the more troubling that Japan, France,
Italy and the United Kingdom are all lagging behind their partners
in the G7-group in fully implementing the ban on bribery,'' Eigen
added.

Britain recently published a White paper pledging effective
legislation. But Eigen noted that this may not get onto the statue
books ahead of the next general election so that effective laws
may be years, rather than months, away.

In Italy, implementing legislation has been repeatedly amended
and still needs final approval by the Senate.

TI deplored the scant resources at the OECD to monitor whether
member countries have not only translated the Convention into
domestic law but are also actually applying and enforcing it.

''It seems all the more incredible that, with a staff of 1,800,
the OECD cannot assign more than three (sic!) people to make
sure that the Convention achieves its objectives,'' noted Eigen.
(END/IPS/raj/sm/00)


Origin: Harare/G7/8 SUMMIT/
                              ----

       [c] 2000, InterPress Third World News Agency (IPS)
                     All rights reserved

**********
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
URL: http://home3.inet.tele.dk/mcamara
                             ******************

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2