Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:38:54 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 2/8/2001 8:02:12 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> well those
> >cheap and silly soda you are so fond of are not any
> >better than the coke we drink here. and if you really
> >think its for the dogs why dont you ask those that
> >make it to send the whole lot to your family in
> >Kairaba avenue because you all look like BULL DOGS.
Isatou:
There is no doubt that the Coca Cola we used to drink was not of the
greatest quality. Though we had no better choice for a drink and were
consequently forced to drink it, I myself did see some of the lesser
desirable qualitiesthat Astrid talked about in her email. For example, I
found lumps of coagulated concentrate in it once or twice. Nevertheless, a
classic bottle of coke, bread, butter and some cheese was one of my
favories, especially during our 1 hour lunch breaks at GHS and SAHS.
Anyway, to make a long story short, Astrid's post was made in good jest and
calling her family names is unwarranted when her posting is viewed in this
light.
All is good!
Yus
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
You may also send subscription requests to [log in to unmask]
if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to write your full name and e-mail address.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|