----- Original Message ----- 
From: Ndey Jobarteh 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Cc: [log in to unmask] 
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 10:34 PM
Subject: FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]


Hi,



I am sending the mail below and it is rejected and i tried again without success.

Thanks

Ndy








------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From:  [log in to unmask]
  To:  [log in to unmask]
  Subject:  Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
  Date:  Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:31:37 -0400
  >Your posting  to the GAMBIA-L list  has been rejected because  it only contains
  >material in a format disallowed by the list configuration. Even though the list
  >is configured  to remove unwanted material  and process the remaining  text, in
  >this case there  would be nothing left after removing  the disallowed material.
  >You may want to resend your message in plain text, which is always allowed.





  Sidibeh,

   

  I completely agree with you but since it has found its way here, I guess these sentences needs to be trashed and put in its proper context.  

   In the letter "I am to convey to you that the NADD Executive has rejected your proposal to expand the UDP/NRP informal Alliance to include NADD. In the same vein the proposal for the flag bearer not to have a one term limit is also rejected. "

  If UDP/NRP wants genuine alliance I believe they will have to revisit the NADD MOU and renegotiate any provision they consider unacceptable as stated clearly in this letter. There no need to pretend any more we have to face the hard fact that there is a high chance that the coalition under UDP, NRP, NDAM and PDOIs will never take place so we have to cut our losses and rally around NADD. Those who still believe in negations to bring the parties together can still go on but I for one think that it is better to dedicate ones energy in strategies to bring Jammeh down come next election. 

   

  In the letter" Finally, the proposal for a new Alliance to concentrate on changing the regime and then discuss all programs after the change has occurred is also rejected."

   

  The above proposal is completely unacceptable for any serious minded person or party. How can parties agreed to come together and then later discuss their programs. I for one will never vote for such an alliance. 

   

  In the letter: "This is why we have suggested for UDP/NRP to revisit the NADD MOU and renegotiate any provision they consider unacceptable. The position of flag bearer has always been negotiable since the NADD flag bearer had declared that he is willing to step down once a person who can best serve as a unifying factor is found."

   

  I believe that UDP/NRP is given the green light and they should really think through this and come out with a better solution. Until now they have not come out concrete issues that need to be dealt with. Now that the door is open for them to revisit the MOU and renegotiate, I strongly believe that they should take this opportunity if they are genuinely in for this alliance. 

   

  The Struggle Continues!!

  Ndey Jobarteh



   




¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤