Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 20 May 1999 10:17:38 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 5/20/99 8:43:16 AM Central Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
<< Dear list members,
I am surprised at the barrage of negative comments being thrown at Katim.
He is doing well for the list so we should commend him for that. Why are
some of us insinuating that he is a dictator or tyrant? He got rid of a bad
apple whose sole aim had been the disintegration of the list. Be polite and
ask why the changes are taking place and not draw baseless conclusions.
alanmbooj
>>
MY SENTIMENTS EXACTLY. I AM SURE THERE MUST BE A GOOD REASON FOR THE CHANGE,
SO WHY NOT ENQUIRE POLITELY, RATHER THAN ENGAGE IN PERSONAL ATTACKS AND
UNFOUNDED SPECULATION. I GUESS SOME OF US MUST HAVE SECRETLY ENJOYED THE
POISONOUS ATMOSPHERE OF THE LIST THAT PREVAILED, SINCE KATIM HAS BEEN SUBJECT
TO ALL KINDS OF SNIDE REMARKS SINCE THAT PROBLEM WAS TAKEN CARE OF. NO WONDER
WE HAVE A PROLIFERATION OF ABUSIVE LEADERSHIP IN AFRICA, I THINK SOME OF US
THRIVE ON DISHARMONY AND CONTINUED FRICTION , BECAUSE IT SEEMS EVERY TIME
SOMEONE EMBARKS ON A POSITIVE TREND, THEY BECOME INSTANT ENEMIES TO SOME OF
US. VERY CURIOUS INDEED.
JABOU
JABOU
|
|
|