GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Momodou Buharry Gassama <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Momodou Buharry Gassama <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Nov 2006 08:24:54 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (127 lines)
Saddam Hussein?s death sentence: a travesty of justice
By James Cogan
6 November 2006
Use this version to print | Send this link by email | Email the author

The death sentences handed down yesterday against Saddam Hussein and 
three other prominent figures in his regime are the outcome of show 
trial concocted for political purposes. Amid unspeakable atrocities 
being committed against the people of Iraq every day by the US 
occupation forces, a hand-picked court has condemned the former Iraqi 
dictator to die. The very timing of the sentence is an attempt to lift 
the electoral fortunes of the Republican Party in Tuesday?s 
congressional elections by energising its right-wing base with the 
prospect of a high profile legal lynching.

Saddam Hussein and the leading personnel of the Iraqi Baath Party 
should be tried for the litany of crimes they committed against the 
Iraqi people. The Bush administration, however, and the American ruling 
class as a whole, have no right to oversee the trial of anyone in Iraq 
for crimes against humanity. The invasion of 2003 was a war crime, an 
unprovoked act of aggression that was justified with lies and carried 
out in defiance of international law.

In the subsequent three-and-a-half years, the US occupation has 
attempted to subjugate the Iraqi people through mass killings, torture 
and the destruction of entire cities. A study conducted by the John 
Hopkins University?the only credible attempt to estimate the number of 
casualties inflicted by the war and occupation?found that the US 
government is responsible for the deaths of 655,000 Iraqis. Preceding 
the war, the United Nations sanctions from 1991 to 2003 cost the lives 
of one million Iraqis through malnutrition and disease.

The pro-war media are predictably highlighting the instances of 
celebration among Shiite and Kurdish Iraqis in response to the death 
sentence against Hussein. There can be no concept of justice in Iraq, 
however, until the individuals in Washington, London and elsewhere who 
are responsible for 15 years of death and suffering are brought to 
trial and the illegal occupation of the country by tens of thousands of 
American and allied troops has been ended.

Moreover, US governments going back to the 1960s provided political 
and financial support to Hussein and the Baathists as they carried out 
some of their most brutal atrocities?from the massacres of Communist 
Party members and socialist-minded workers in 1963 and again in 1979, 
to the slaughter of Shiite fundamentalist and Kurdish nationalist 
opponents of the regime during the 1980s.

The very killings for which Hussein has been sentenced to death?the 
execution of 148 Shiite men and boys from the village of Dujail in 1982?
took place within the context of the setbacks being suffered by the 
Iraqi military in the US-backed Iraqi war against Iran. The US directly 
encouraged Hussein to invade Iran in 1980 and provided Iraq with 
political, financial and military support throughout the eight-year 
conflict because it viewed the theocratic Shiite regime, which came to 
power in Tehran in 1979, as a threat to its interests in the Middle 
East.

The war ultimately cost the lives of more than one million Iraqis and 
Iranians. In the midst of the carnage, the US supported the so-called 
?Anfal? campaign that was ordered by Hussein to wipe out the Iranian-
backed Kurdish rebellion in the north, for which he is also on trial. 
In 1991, following the Gulf War, the first Bush administration ordered 
the US military to do nothing to prevent Hussein?s forces from 
suppressing Shiite and Kurdish uprisings.

Any legitimate trial of Hussein would expose the culpability of the US 
and other major powers in the crimes of the Baathist regime in Iraq. 
The travesty that has taken place did the opposite. It prevented any 
evidence being presented that documented the relationship between a 
brutal dictatorship and great power interests. There has been no 
accounting with the past or justice for those who were murdered. Only 
the most selective evidence relating directly to the events in Dujail 
was presented. As an additional precaution, the television broadcast 
from the court was delayed by 20 minutes so censors could delete 
anything that was considered damaging to the American occupation.

The entire process has been a shameless show trial. The Iraq Special 
Tribunal was established by an edict issued by US proconsul Paul 
Bremmer in 2003. Its judges and prosecutors were selected by American 
officials and instructed by American advisors. The court?s lack of 
credibility and impartiality has been sharply criticised by Human 
Rights Watch, Amnesty International and other international observers. 
On numerous occasions, court proceedings took place in the absence of 
the defendants or under conditions where they were denied the right to 
have their own lawyers present.

In January, the chief judge was pressured to step down after the US 
media and Iraqi government accused him of not doing enough to prevent 
Hussein from using the witness stand to denounce the court?s 
legitimacy. Three lawyers representing the defendants were murdered and 
others forced to flee the country, most likely by death squads working 
for the Shiite fundamentalist parties that dominate the US-backed 
government in Baghdad.

The American ambassador in Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, hailed the death 
sentence against Hussein yesterday as an ?important milestone? in the 
?building of a free society based on the rule of law?. President Bush 
declared that the verdict was ?a milestone in the Iraqi people?s 
efforts to replace the rule of a tyrant with the rule of law?.

The cynicism of these statements is staggering. Numerous leaks to the 
US media indicate that officials like Khalilzad have spent the past 
several months plotting a coup against the Shiite-dominated government 
of Prime Minister Nouri al-Malaki and its replacement with some form of 
military junta. There is a growing consensus among both Republicans and 
Democrats that US interests in Iraq would be better served by a regime 
very similar to that of Hussein.

Even as Hussein is sentenced to hang, the US political establishment 
is discussing putting many of the Baathist killers and thugs that 
underpinned his regime back in power, in exchange for ending their 
guerilla war against American forces and agreeing to an arrangement for 
the US corporate plunder of Iraq?s oil resources. The prelude to any 
move to rehabilitate the Baathist elite will be a bloodbath by the US 
military against the Shiite militiamen in areas like Sadr City in 
Baghdad who paraded in the streets yesterday to celebrate the outcome 
of the Hussein trial.

いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい

ATOM RSS1 RSS2