GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:28:30 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (273 lines)
 Monbiot.com <http://www.monbiot.com/> Articles by George Monbiot
  Israel's Attack Was Premeditated
<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2006/08/08/israels-attack-was-premeditated/>
Posted
August 8, 2006

Hizbullah's capture of Israeli soldiers provided the excuse for an assault
planned for months.

By George Monbiot. Published in the Guardian 8th August 2006



Whatever we think of Israel's assault on Lebanon, all of us seem to agree
about one fact: that it was a response, however disproportionate, to an
unprovoked attack by Hizbullah. I repeated this "fact" in my last column,
when I wrote that "Hizbullah fired the first shots". This being so, the
Israeli government's supporters ask peaceniks like me, what would you have
done? It's an important question. But its premise, I have now discovered, is
flawed.

Since Israel's withdrawal from southern Lebanon in May 2000, there have been
hundreds of violations of the "blue line" between the two countries. The
United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) reports that Israeli
aircraft crossed the line "on an almost daily basis" between 2001 and 2003,
and "persistently" until 2006(1). These incursions "caused great concern to
the civilian population, particularly low-altitude flights that break the
sound barrier over populated areas". On some occasions Hizbullah tried to
shoot them down with anti-aircraft guns.

In October 2000, the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) shot at unarmed Palestinian
demonstrators on the border, killing three and wounding 20. In response,
Hizbullah crossed the line and kidnapped three Israeli soldiers. On several
occasions, Hizbullah fired missiles and mortar rounds at IDF positions, and
the IDF responded with heavy artillery and sometimes aerial bombardment.
Incidents like this killed three Israelis and three Lebanese in 2003; one
Israeli soldier and two Hizbullah fighters in 2005 and two Lebanese people
and three Israeli soldiers in February 2006. Rockets were fired from Lebanon
into Israel several times in 2004, 2005 and 2006, on some occasions by
Hizbullah. But, the UN records, "none of the incidents resulted in a
military escalation"(2).

On May 26th this year, two officials of Islamic Jihad – Nidal and Mahmoud
Majzoub – were killed by a car bomb in the Lebanese city of Sidon. This was
widely assumed in Lebanon and Israel to be the work of Mossad, the Israeli
intelligence agency(3). In June a man named Mahmoud Rafeh confessed to the
killings and admitted that he had been working for Mossad since 1994(4).
Militants in southern Lebanon responded, on the day of the bombing, by
launching eight rockets into Israel. One soldier was lightly wounded. There
was a major bust-up on the border, during which one member of Hizbullah was
killed and several wounded, and one Israeli soldier wounded. But while the
border region "remained tense and volatile", UNIFIL says it was "generally
quiet" until July 12th(5).

There has been a heated debate on the internet about whether the two Israeli
soldiers kidnapped by Hizbullah that day were captured in Israel or in
Lebanon(6), but it now seems pretty clear that they were seized in Israel.
This is what the UN says, and even Hizbullah seems to have forgotten that
they were supposed to have be found sneaking around the outskirts of the
Lebanese village of Aitaa al-Chaab. Now it states simply that "the Islamic
Resistance captured two Israeli soldiers at the border with occupied
Palestine"(7). Three other Israeli soldiers were killed by the militants.
There is also some dispute about when, on July 12th, Hizbullah first fired
its rockets; but UNIFIL makes it clear that the firing took place at the
same time as the raid – 9 am. Its purpose seems to have been to create a
diversion. No one was hit.

But there is no serious debate about why the two soldiers were captured:
Hizbullah was seeking to exchange them for the 15 prisoners of war taken by
the Israelis during the occupation of Lebanon(8) and (in breach of article
118 of the third Geneva convention(9)) never released. It seems clear that
if Israel had handed over the prisoners, it would – without the spillage of
any more blood – have retrieved its men and reduced the likelihood of
further kidnappings. But the Israeli government refused to negotiate.
Instead – well, we all know what happened instead. Almost 1,000 Lebanese and
33 Israeli civilians have been killed so far, and a million Lebanese
displaced from their homes.

On July 12th, in other words, Hizbullah fired the first shots. But that act
of aggression was simply one instance in a long sequence of small incursions
and attacks over the past six years, by both sides. So why was the Israeli
response so different from all that preceded it? The answer is that it was
not a reaction to the events of that day. The assault had been planned for
months.

The San Francisco Chronicle reports that "More than a year ago, a senior
Israeli army officer began giving PowerPoint presentations, on an
off-the-record basis, to US and other diplomats, journalists and think
tanks, setting out the plan for the current operation in revealing
detail."(10) The attack, he said, would last for three weeks. It would begin
with bombing and culminate in a ground invasion. Gerald Steinberg, professor
of political science at Bar-Ilan University, told the paper that "of all of
Israel's wars since 1948, this was the one for which Israel was most
prepared … By 2004, the military campaign scheduled to last about three
weeks that we're seeing now had already been blocked out and, in the last
year or two, it's been simulated and rehearsed across the board."(11)

A "senior Israeli official" told the Washington Post that the raid by
Hizbullah provided Israel with a "unique moment" for wiping out
Hizbullah(12). The New Statesman's editor John Kampfner says he was told by
more than one official source that the United States government knew in
advance of Israel's intention to take military action in Lebanon(13). The
Bush administration told the British government(14).

Israel's assault, then, was premeditated: it was simply waiting for an
appropriate excuse. It was also unnecessary. It is true that Hizbullah had
been building up munitions close to the border, as its current rocket
attacks show. But so had Israel. Just as Israel could assert that it was
seeking to deter incursions by Hizbullah, Hizbullah could claim – also with
justification – that it was trying to deter incursions by Israel. The
Lebanese army is certainly incapable of doing so. Yes, Hizbullah should have
been pulled back from the Israeli border by the Lebanese government and
disarmed. Yes, the raid and the rocket attack on July 12th were unjustified,
stupid and provocative, like just about everything that has taken place
around the border for the past six years. But the suggestion that Hizbullah
could launch an invasion of Israel or constitutes an existential threat to
the state is preposterous. Since the occupation ended, all its acts of war
have been minor ones, and nearly all of them reactive.

So it is not hard to answer the question of what we would have done. First,
stop recruiting enemies, by withdrawing from the occupied territories in
Palestine and Syria. Second, stop provoking the armed groups in Lebanon with
violations of the blue line – in particular the persistent flights across
the border. Third, release the prisoners of war who remain unlawfully
incarcerated in Israel. Fourth, continue to defend the border, while
maintaining the diplomatic pressure on Lebanon to disarm Hizbullah (as
anyone can see, this would be much more feasible if the occupations were to
end). Here then is my challenge to the supporters of the Israeli government:
do you dare to contend that this programme would have caused more death and
destruction than the current adventure has done?

www.monbiot.com

References:

1. UNIFIL, August 2006. Lebanon – UNIFIL - Background.
http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/missions/unifil/background.html

2. ibid.

3. See FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting), 28th July 2006. Down the
Memory Hole: Israeli contribution to conflict is forgotten by leading
papers. http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2928

4. Nicholas Blanford, 15th June 2006. Lebanon exposes deadly Israeli spy
ring. The Times.

5. UNIFIL, 21st July 2006. Report of the Secretary-General on the United
Nations

Interim Force in Lebanon (For the period from 21 January 2006 to 18 July
2006). UN Security Council.

http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N06/437/22/IMG/N0643722.pdf?OpenElement

6. See for example Joshua Frank, 25th July 2006. Kidnapped in Israel;
Captured in Lebanon?

http://www.palestinechronicle.org/story-07250662242.htm and
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/israeli_solders.html

7. Hizbullah, quoted by Big News Network.com <http://network.com/>, 4th
August 2006. Hezbollah not to blame for war, reports show.
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=b9f8e9f0e04f1f52

8. http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/91.htm

9. They are listed by the Khiam Center, at:

http://www.khiamcenter.org/names%20of%20leb%20detainees%20and%20missing.doc

10. Matthew Kalman, 21st July 2006. Israel set war plan more than a year
ago:

Strategy was put in motion as Hezbollah began gaining military strength in
Lebanon. San Francisco Chronicle.

11. Quoted by Matthew Kalman, ibid.

12. Robin Wright, 16th July 2006. Strikes Are Called Part of Broad Strategy:
U.S., Israel Aim to Weaken Hezbollah, Region's Militants. Washington Post.
My attention was drawn to this article by Tanya Reinhart, 28th July 2006.
Israel's "New Middle East". www.redress.btinternet.co.uk/treinhart17.htm

13. John Kampfner, pers comm.

14. John Kampfner, 7th August 2006. Blood on his hands. New Statesman.






 No Comment

   1.

Comments are closed.
Posting your comment.

   Categories

   - advertising <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/advertising/>
   - Books <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/books/>
   - climate change<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/climate-change/>
   - corporate power<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/corporate-power/>
   - culture <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/culture/>
   - economic justice<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/economic-justice/>
   - education &
childhood<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/education-childhood/>
   - employment <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/employment/>
   - environment <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/environment/>
   - farming <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/farming/>
   - food <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/food/>
   - foreign affairs<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/foreign-affairs/>
   - General <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/general/>
   - genetic engineering<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/genetic-engineering/>
   - globalisation<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/globalisation/>
   - health <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/health/>
   - health & safety<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/health-safety/>
   - hunting & the
countryside<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/hunting-the-countryside/>
   - interviews and
debates<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/interviews-and-debates/>
   - landrights &
planning<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/landrights-planning/>
   - law & order <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/law-order/>
   - media <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/media/>
   - nuclear <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/nuclear/>
   - oil <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/oil/>
   - politics <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/politics/>
   - privatisation<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/privatisation/>
   - protest <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/protest/>
   - racism <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/racism/>
   - religion <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/religion/>
   - science <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/science/>
   - supermarkets<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/supermarkets/>
   - tourism <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/tourism/>
   - transport <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/transport/>
   - war - afghanistan<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/war-afghanistan/>
   - war - general<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/war-general/>
   - war - iraq <http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/war-iraq/>

Links

   - About George
Monbiot<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2000/06/09/about-george-monbiot/>
   - Careers Advice<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2000/06/09/choose-life/>
   - Contact <[log in to unmask]>
   - Discuss these articles<http://talk.torchbox.com/mailman/listinfo/monbiot>
   - Introduction<http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2001/04/09/in-defence-of-trouble/>
   - Notification of new
articles<http://talk.torchbox.com/mailman/listinfo/monbiot-announce>
   - Talks <http://www.monbiot.com/index.php?p=886>
   - What Can I Do? <http://www.globalrising.org/>

Stay Updated

   - RSS Articles <http://www.monbiot.com/feed/>

 Copyright (c) 2006 Monbiot.com <http://monbiot.com/>
Powered by WordPress <http://www.wordpress.org/> | Designed by Stephen
Reinhardt <http://vaguedream.com/wordpress-themes>

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

ATOM RSS1 RSS2