GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dampha Kebba <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:48:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
Yes Jaiteh, let's move on. Even though you still have not shown how what I
said hurt the defense, that is okay. Suffice for me to say though that when
I saw Ebrima's statements, rather than silence, I thought he was inviting
people with wherewithal to poke some holes in the 'government's side' and
seek to somehow bring out the defense's side. Clearly, we saw the statements
from different angles. I accept your explanation in good faith and
understand why you still do not believe in the authenticity of these
Statements. But frankly, I am still struggling to understand how our
discussions negatively impact the defense, particularly the issue of
'element of surprise' at trial.

Feel free to continue this discourse in private if you want. And please do
not misinterpret my silence if you do not hear from me on G_L about this
topic.
KB



>From: "Malanding S. Jaiteh" <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list
><[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Fw:      On Dumo Saho, Barrow and others - please lets move
>Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:52:59 -0400
>
>Kebba,
>It is not my intention to make you look any other than a reasoned Gambian.
>
>As to why I am concerned about what is discussed about the case, please
>spend a few minutes and re-read Ebrima Ceesay's introduction to the
>statements (reproduced below) particularly the paragraphs:
>
> > These "Cautionary Statements, Statements of Offence and Particulars of
> > Offence" are from the Government-side.  We are yet to hear directly what
>the
> > accused persons have to say about these statements.  The government
>claims
> > to have gotten them (the statements) from the accused persons and we
>should
> > be bearing this in mind.  How far can we trust what the government side
>is
> > saying?
>
>and
>
> > In this twenty-first century, we cannot afford to take the printed word
>in
> > whatever forum, as the gospel truth.  This is a period in our history
>when
> > we MUST develop the art of critical and independent thinking, based on
> > factual evidence.  In short, we have to use our brains at all times!!
>
>I am sure you will realize that this is indeed a big misunderstanding. Have
>a good day.
>
>Malanding Jaiteh
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
You may also send subscription requests to [log in to unmask]
if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to write your full name and e-mail address.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2