GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sigga jagne <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:03:42 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (232 lines)
My sentiments exactly.  And I think it would be a good
idea to put what you have written here in a letter and
send it to the British Foreign Affairs Cabinet.  I can
always supply their E-mail address.

--- Dampha Kebba <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> First of all, I wish to take this opportunity to
> thank Ms. Jagne again for
> her efforts. Decent Gambians should emulate what Ms.
> Jagne is doing and has
> done for our dear country and its citizens.
> The letter from Mr. Hackett just confirms my earlier
> views about this whole
> debacle. The letter also reinforces my notion that
> the British government is
> insensitive to the plight of the innocent and
> defenseless Gambian citizens.
> This double talk highlights the hypocrisy of this
> government and makes a
> mockery of their 'ethical foreign policy'. Did we
> not say weeks ago that
> this is about Sierra Leone, British troops and the
> British electorate? At
> least Hackett had the decency to admit that. Let us
> face it, the British
> care less about whether Yaya's brute machine will go
> out and murder innocent
> Gambian children. All the British are concerned
> about, is ways of avoiding
> British soldiers being killed in theaters like East
> Timor, Sierra Leone and
> other so called Third World countries. We know where
> they stand. Our duty is
> to condemn them strongly and showcase their
> insensitivity and hypocrisy. It
> is disingenuous for the British to pretend that they
> are on the side of our
> children by claiming that they want justice done on
> the issue of the April
> massacre, yet at the same time, they are helping to
> further arm the brutal
> forces that perpetrated the massacre. This is simple
> logic. To save the
> lives of professional British soldiers, the British
> are putting the lives of
> innocent Gambian children in jeopardy. It is telling
> that Hackett only
> highlighted our government's achievements in the
> international peacekeeping
> arena. He conveniently ignored the blatant human
> rights violations the
> regime is engaged in and will continue to engage in
> with the support of the
> British. I want to let Hackett know that there is no
> substantive movement in
> the case of the massacred victims. The people
> responsible for those heinous
> acts are still roaming the streets of Banjul as free
> men and women. The
> coroner's inquest and subsequent commission of
> inquiry came up with bogus
> findings. These were merely delay tactics employed
> by the government and
> their friends in the EU to thwart the wheels of
> justice. I repeat that up to
> today (more than six months after the massacre), not
> a single person has
> been brought to justice. I would also like to inform
> Hackett that the UDP
> supporters that were ambushed in Basse are still
> under jeopardy. The
> attorney general of our illegal government is still
> trying to send Ousainou
> Darboe and his supporters to jail. The government
> currently has an
> application before the Gambian court of appeal which
> is aiming at revoking
> the bail granted to Ousainou Darboe and his
> supporters. Thanks to the
> ineptitude of the attorney general's chambers,
> Darboe et al still do not
> know their fate because when the attorney general is
> scheduled to come to
> court, he absconds. So the net result is that the
> matter of the ambush is
> still unresolved. Britain and the EU should not take
> any diplomatic credit
> for the state of that case. In the first place, APRC
> thugs should not have
> ambushed the UDP supporters. Secondly, what can be
> more absurd than 25
> people being accused for the murder of one person
> (the aggressor because he
> went to a lawful gathering, uninvited)? Thirdly, how
> can the Brits reconcile
> the fact that Gambian law enforcement was super
> efficient in this ambush
> case, whereas in the case of the massacre of 15
> innocent and defenseless
> Gambian children, no one has been brought to court
> to answer charges. I
> think Hackett should look for other things to brag
> about than trying to
> defend Yaya's dismal human rights record. Since we
> are on the subject of the
> ambush, what did the Brits do about the dismissal of
> the magistrate that
> ordered the release of Darboe and his supporters. Am
> not trying to say that
> it is the Brits' responsibility to do something
> about that. All am trying to
> say is that, it is gross hypocrisy for the Brits to
> cite incidents like the
> Basse ambush and the formation of a commission of
> inquiry to look into the
> massacre of our children in order to prove that the
> British are doing a
> great job in trying to promote human rights in The
> Gambia. The British do
> not care if the army goes out tomorrow and murder
> innocent Gambian children.
> They do not care if the army sits by and watch APRC
> thugs butcher political
> opponents, burn down properties of innocent Gambians
> and abduct defenseless
> citizens. Case in point is a recent seminar the
> British organized in order
> to bring together law enforcement and human rights
> activists in The Gambia.
> At the seminar, NIA officers stood up and denied
> ever abducting Gambian
> citizens. This was done at a time when people like
> Dumo were languishing in
> jail, incommunicado. The point am trying to make, is
> that token gestures
> like organizing such seminars is neither here nor
> there. The NIA goes there
> and tell blatant lies and go out the following day
> and abduct innocent
> Gambians and torture them. That is the human rights
> record of Yaya and his
> security apparatus. They are not out to protect
> innocent Gambians. They are
> out to protect Yaya at any cost. If it means
> murdering 15 innocent Gambian
> children, so be it.
> We also resent the way Hackett was trying to
> downplay this resumption of aid
> by implying that the aid is restricted to taking few
> officers to Sandhurst.
> The British ambassador in The Gambia told his
> friends in the army that this
> was just the beginning. The next we know, Britain
> will be supplying weapons
> to these vermin. People like Hackett should know
> that they are not dealing
> with fools or impotent morons any more. The Yayas
> and the Edward Singhatehs
> of this world are illiterate morons that do not
> represent what is good in
> The Gambia and Gambians. Gone are the days when
> silly statements like those
> given by Hackett will pass muster. Hackett can try
> all he wants, but he
> cannot justify arming Yaya to murder innocent
> Gambian children. What Hackett
> has to realize, is that the primary purpose of our
> army is to defend the
> lives of innocent Gambians, and not to participate
> in international
> peacekeeping missions. I have nothing against
> international peacekeeping
> missions, but the insignificant contributions Gambia
> makes to such missions
> should not be rewarded by this insensitive move from
> the British.
> We again urge the Gambians in Britain to continue
> their protest on this
> matter. The hypocrisy and insensitivity of the
> British government has to be
> unmasked. The British electorate has to be informed
> of this debacle. I hate
> attacking other members of the opposition, but
> frankly I must express
> disappointment in the Jawara camp. How can they let
> the British get away
> with such a despicable act? We are in all this mess
> because of the
> ineptitude of the Jawara regime. They should
> tirelessly work to ensure that
> we get rid of Yaya. Sitting in Britain and watching
> the British arm Yaya
> further is disgraceful. We should let the British
> know that taxpayer money
> is being used to support a despot that boasts about
> allies like Gaddafi and
> Charles Taylor; a despot that is worst than Idi Amin
> Dada. We should not be
> satisfied unless the British admit this fiasco and
> withdraw their aid to
> dictator Yaya.
> KB
>
>
>
> >From: Sigga jagne <[log in to unmask]>
> >Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing
> list
>
=== message truncated ===


=====
"NO ONE CAN MAKE YOU FEEL INFERIOR WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION"

                       ALSO

"NOTHING IS UNACHIEVABLE, THE ONLY QUESTION IS, WHETHER ONE IS WILLING TO DO WHAT IT TAKES TO ACHIEVE WHAT IS DESIRED"

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf!  It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
You may also send subscription requests to [log in to unmask]
if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to write your full name and e-mail address.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2