GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
omar joof <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:30:59 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (112 lines)
Folks,
"Left hands" should read "right hand".


>From: omar joof <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list              
><[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [>-<] Re: Waa Juwara's Comments.
>Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:23:47 +0000
>
>Ya-Soffie,
>There is a mandinka explanation of the three lines we all have on the palm 
>of our left hands. They go thus:
>
>Line 1: You are told;
>
>Line 2: you dont hear;
>
>Line 3: you see.
>
>In the build-up to the presidential election it had been argued that the "  
>two coalition formula is  recipe for Jammeh victory." There were even up to 
>the very last moments, expressions of hope that something would happen 
>which could engender atleast some kind of unity between the two coalitions, 
>but all to no avail!
>The fact is, all the criticisms that are being put forward now were there 
>before the signing of the MOU between the coalition partners and the 
>A(F)PRC. Most of us knew about the flawed electoral process as several 
>contributors on this forum and others elaborated on it. Notwithstanding we 
>committed ourselves to that process. Infact by signing the MOU with the 
>dictatorship, one can argue that the coalition leadership did not show any 
>indication that it shared the conviction that the electoral process was 
>flawed.
>Furthermore, even before the emergence of NADD, many of us stressed the 
>significance of a united opposition as a viable means of getting rid of the 
>dictatorship. We had that Grand Coalition, but in the eleventh hour, it 
>broke up into two, with a number of serious political ramifications.
>For the way forward, we should all accept the errors committed, and resolve 
>to come together as a united opposition to take on the dictatorship at the 
>polls in January. If we dont, we would be in for some other rude awakening. 
>For January, I raise my voice with this prognosis: THE TWO COALITION 
>FORMULA IS RECIPE FOR A DECIMATED OPPOSITION IN THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY!
>Omar Joof.
>
>
>>From: "Ceesay, Soffie" <[log in to unmask]>
>>Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
>>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>Subject: RE: [>-<] Re: Waa Juwara's Comments.
>>Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 07:48:44 -0400
>>
>>Mr. Forster,
>>
>>Good morning.  Juxtapose the two articles to see which qualifies as
>>politically expedient and which is close to factual reporting.  Mr.
>>Barry's piece shows Discordia's hand at work and to opine that what was
>>printed, not reported, "betray a semblance of sympathy towards APRC" by
>>Waa is but an opinion.  Interpreting Waa Juwara's statements to mean
>>that he could be jockeying (with whom?) for leadership is, again, to
>>invite "political debate" on a non-issue.  The Point's article has some
>>substance from which we can glean some of what is important to Waa and
>>many of us who wished to see the back Jammeh for good.
>>
>>Thank you,
>>Soffie Ceesay
>>
>>________________________________
>>
>>From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
>>Behalf Of Joko Forster
>>Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 9:20 PM
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: [>-<] Re: Waa Juwara's Comments.
>>
>>
>>Mr. Barber,
>>With respect, I would refer you to the article carried by The Point
>>Newspaper re. Waa Juwara. You may wish to visit the point website at
>>www.thepoint.gm. Obviously, this paper will not sweat its socks just to
>>earn the president's cheers! Perhaps as a matter for political debate
>>one could attempt to fathom why Waa of all people would make ANY
>>(emphasis mine) statement that could betray a semblance of sympathy
>>towards APRC. For example, is he jockeying for leadership of a possible
>>new umbrella party. thanks.
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>
>いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
>To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L 
>Web interface
>at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>
>To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: 
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
>To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
>[log in to unmask]
>いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい

いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい

ATOM RSS1 RSS2