GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:57:03 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (346 lines)
CIA RECRUITS TERRORIST AGENTS AT GUANTANAMO....LAPD WANTS TO BAN SKI MASKS FROM DEMONSTRATORS' WARDROBES
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Malaika Kambon 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 6:03 PM
Subject: [unioNews] CIA RECRUITS TERRORIST AGENTS AT GUANTANAMO....LAPD WANTS TO BANSKI MASKS FROM DEMONSTRATORS' WARDROBES


NEW AFRIKAN MILLENNIUM
2004 JANUARY

Forwarding:
Courtesy of [log in to unmask], Issue #1229

                IN THIS MESSAGE
* CIA Recruits Terrorist Agents At GUANTANAMO
* LAPD wants to ban ski masks from demonstrators' wardrobes
______________________________________________

CIA RECRUITS TERRORIST AGENTS AT GUANTANAMO 

U.S. efforts to infiltrate Al QAEDA BEGIN WITH CAPTURED COMPATRIOTS  
By Martin Dillon
http://www.americanfreepress.net/01_02_04/CIA_Recruits/cia_recruits.html


Behind the barbed wire, gun turrets and searchlights of the GUANTANAMO 
concentration camp, the CIA is running a secret program to recruit 
turncoats to infiltrate al QAEDA and other organizations to which they 
formerly belonged.

The secrecy surrounding GUANTANAMO has been an essential ingredient in 
permitting CIA agent handlers to assess detainees over a lengthy period of 
time to determine if they are vulnerable to inducements and emotionally 
capable of returning to the world of terrorism as secret tools of the U.S. 
intelligence community. The fact that the identities of the detainees have 
been classified and they have not been permitted legal representation has 
aided those in the CIA who desperately need agents to blend into the 
Islamic world.

The lack of terrorist agents within the U.S. intelligence apparatus in the 
1990s ensured that al QAEDA and similar groupings were able to operate with 
virtual impunity, and to plan operations without the risk that any of their 
cells had been penetrated by informers.

Prior to Sept. 11, the CIA had been forced to rely mainly on electronic 
means to monitor terrorists. That strategy was flawed because satellites 
and telephone intercepts alone were an insufficient means of assessing the 
potential and intentions of the enemy. In fact, little was known about al 
QAEDA'S plans because terrorists had become familiar with the techniques of 
electronic intelligence gathering. The events of Sept. 11 proved that 
HUMINT-human intelligence-is far more effective in learning about planned 
terrorist operations.

The CIA's lack of HUMINT was partly due to a belief within the U.S. 
political and judicial apparatus that the CIA had, in the past, run rogue 
operatives, with terrible consequences. In some respects, that was true and 
for several decades there had been little oversight of the agency's 
handling of agents, particularly those recruited from the criminal world or 
from organizations with a dubious past.

However, the attacks of Sept. 11 exposed a serious weakness, namely the 
CIA's lack of human "assets" within the world of terrorism.

Employing terrorists as agents of the state is never an easy option but in 
a world in which terrorists operate in closely-knit cell structures whose 
members are bonded by family links, as well as social and cultural ties, 
the terrorist agent is the only real option. The Harvard graduate recruited 
by the CIA will never be accepted into a world in which outsiders are 
easily identified.

Recruiting terrorists is a difficult and risky process, if it is conducted 
in the Middle East or Afghanistan. However, when the CIA has hundreds of 
individuals in one place-GUANTANAMO - the process is made easier.

For example, there is time to individually process detainees, to learn 
their family histories, monitor their reactions to confinement, determine 
their social, spiritual and sexual weaknesses and build detailed 
psychological profiles on those who could prove useful if they were 
properly trained and released back into their own communities.

For the past year, the CIA has been working on recruiting among those held 
at GUANTANAMO with the intention of running them as agents. The objective 
has been to train them, place them under the control of agent "handlers" 
and release them back into Afghanistan, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iraq 
and Pakistan. The hope is that they will, over time, join terrorist ranks 
as agents of the CIA. In that way, the CIA will have a constant flow of 
information from within the world of terror.

Recruitment of a terrorist agent begins with identifying a detainee as 
someone worthy of scrutiny-a person likely to have been a serious "player" 
or an unwilling operative. That is followed by the use of techniques to 
break his spirit-hooding, sleep deprivation, "white noise" and long periods 
of questioning and isolation.

Not all of those seized, during and after the war in Afghanistan and in 
Iraq, have been subjected to special treatment, but those who have are the 
ones who may have provided information on al QAEDA'S  leadership, tactics 
and plans for future attacks.

The CIA interrogation teams at GUANTANAMO have been careful in their choice 
of captives to be subjected to intense interrogation. Most of those 
selected have been either key figures in the al QAEDA network and Taliban, 
or foot soldiers with little ideological commitment.

The task of getting them to divulge information or to agree to become 
future assets for U.S. intelligence agencies has not been easy. Some of the 
more seasoned detainees have proved harder to break under interrogation and 
may not be ideal for agent recruitment, whereas foot soldiers, many of whom 
are concerned with survival, have shown a greater willingness to change sides.

For the CIA interrogation teams in GUANTANAMO, the interrogation process is 
a highly complex one, much like a chess game in which every move is 
carefully choreographed. Once a terrorist is selected for in-depth 
interrogation, there are military doctors on hand to constantly monitor him 
to ensure he can withstand lengthy questioning and extreme pressure.

After long hours of solitary confinement, "white noise" and hooding, some 
terror suspects mentally disintegrate to the point that they are incapable 
of providing critical information and unlikely to make terrorist agents if 
recruited and released back into their own world.

The aim of in-depth interrogation is to break the will of a terrorist to 
the point where he is detached from reality and vulnerable to 
suggestion-the suggestion that he might like to work for his enemy to 
guarantee his own survival. It is also geared to undermining the 
ideological commitment that led him into terrorism and to convince him that 
the beliefs he held were flawed.

A regular CIA tactic is to confine a detainee to a cell with no windows so 
that he can never determine whether it is day or night. "White noise" is 
then played into the cell so that, over a prolonged period, it has a 
disorientating effect.

Another part of the interrogation routine is sleep deprivation-wakening the 
detainee after he has slept for one hour or maybe three or just five minutes.

After weeks of this procedure, most terrorist captives are emotionally and 
intellectually defenseless, and vulnerable to suggestion and inducements.

A professional terrorist may also be subjected to the "helicopter 
technique." He is hooded and placed in a helicopter, which lifts off the 
ground and into the air. After a flight of only several minutes, he is 
thrown out of the helicopter when it is only feet off the ground. The aim 
of the exercise is to further increase his fear and vulnerability and to 
convince him that his interrogators have the power to end his life at any 
time.

DIFFICULT TO BREAK

Several of the more experienced al QAEDA operatives have reportedly proved 
difficult to break. In some instances, they have resisted in-depth 
interrogation for months. But, in every case, they have finally succumbed 
to pressure.

A typical example was 31-year-old Omar al FARUQ,  suspected of being a top 
al QAEDA  leader in Southeast Asia who was tracked to the village of CIJERUK 
near Jakarta, the Indonesian capital. Al FARUQ had been top of a list of al 
QAEDA operatives whose identities were revealed by Abu ZUBAYDAH, the 
highest-ranking terrorist in U.S. custody. ZUBAYDAH had been subjected to 
months of sensory deprivation before he began "singing" to his 
interrogators. Yet, when first captured he had tried to fool them by 
providing tidbits of information. Finally he named, among others, al FARUQ aruq 
who was believed to have masterminded bombings in Malaysia.

 From the moment al FARUQ was arrested and handed over to British and 
American interrogators, he strenuously denied that he had been al QAEDA'S 
point man in Southeast Asia. For three months, he resisted all efforts to 
break his will. But, just as ZUBAYDAH ubaydah had collapsed under the strain of 
sleep deprivation, hooding, harassment and "white noise", al FARUQ offered 
to "cooperate."

Yet, it is not men like al FARUQ  who are being recruited as terrorist 
agents at GUANTANAMO but lesser figures down the chain, some of whom were 
seasoned bombers and gunmen. For instance, if al FARUQ were released to 
operate as a terrorist agent, he would not be effective. His fellow 
terrorists would know that someone of his stature would not be freed unless 
he had struck a deal with the CIA.

The CIA has found, through its terrorist recruitment program, that lesser 
figures with a low terrorist profile are ideal for release because they 
will more successfully blend back into their own communities-men who have 
not been missed in the turmoil of the war in Afghanistan.

Their CIA handlers have briefed them to return to a normal life in their 
respective communities and then to slowly integrate once again into 
terrorist ranks. Some will be sleeper agents, meaning they will not be 
activated as agents until their handlers require them to join a terrorist 
organization.

  ======================================
JANUARY 9 - 15, 2004

FACE OF A PROTESTER
LAPD WANTS TO BAN SKI MASKS FROM DEMONSTRATORS' WARDROBES
by Robert Greene
http://www.laweekly.com/ink/printme.php?eid=50115

The Los Angeles Police Department is seeking the fast track for new laws to 
ban face coverings, gas masks or even goggles at public demonstrations, 
where the devices could weaken officers who want to control crowds with 
pepper spray and other chemicals. The proposal advanced this week after 
Police Commission members dismissed any First Amendment objections as 
premature.

Deputy Chief Mike Hillman, who heads the LAPD'S special operations bureau, 
told the commission it's important to move quickly and get the laws on the 
books before expected anti-war demonstrations on March 20, the anniversary 
of the U.S. attack on Iraq. In fact, Hillman said, the LAPD would just as 
soon get the new rules in place to deal with an even earlier expected 
assault on public order - at the February 15 NBA All-Star Game at Staples 
Center.

If protesters wear scarves around their noses and mouths and swim goggles 
to protect their eyes at public gatherings, Hillman told the commission, 
"the ability of that officer to gain compliance is restricted."

Police Commission President David Cunningham III warned that the proposals 
raise severe constitutional questions, especially since some of the items 
to be added to the banned list could be used for legitimate purposes. But 
the five-lawyer commission gave the LAPD the go-ahead to work with the City 
Attorney's Office and the City Council to prepare draft amendments to the 
city Municipal Code.

Civil rights lawyers and activists said they were outraged that the city 
would consider new restrictions on how demonstrators could express or 
defend themselves, especially since trials are right around the corner in 
two lawsuits over police response at the 2000 Democratic National 
Convention at Staples. Trial is to start February 24 in a class action 
brought on behalf of demonstrators and passersby injured by rubber bullets 
at the DNC. A second trial, seeking an injunction to change current LAPD 
crowd control practices, is set to begin in mid-May.

Attorney Carol SOBEL,  who represents plaintiffs in the May trial, scoffed 
at the proposals, which are in their initial stages.

"In Los Angeles, the only time a problem has arisen is when the police have 
rioted," SOBEL  said. "They have pepper spray and OCS on hand, and it has an 
expiration date. They want to use it before it goes bad. And I'm not being 
facetious."

The Municipal Code currently bars thick wooden sticks and bottles from 
demonstrations, on grounds that they could be used as weapons. The LAPD is 
seeking to amend sections 55.07 and 55.08 to include metal poles and 
sticks, devices known as "sleeping dragons" that protesters use to chain 
themselves to fixed objects, masks "and similar devices intended to filter 
air," rocks, projectiles, spray cans, wrist rockets, aerosol cans and 
chemical agents.

Hillman said the list grew from a body of knowledge the department has 
gained during the course of demonstrations like the 1999 protests at the 
World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle and the DNC in Los Angeles. The 
LAPD also encountered a mini-riot in June 2000 at Staples after the Lakers 
beat the Indiana Pacers to win the NBA title. Police in riot gear and on 
horseback battled fans who set two police cars on fire in a celebratory and 
often violent spree.

Hillman told the panel that other cities adjacent to Los Angeles have laws 
similar to those the LAPD is seeking, and that those laws have not been 
challenged. Hillman could not be reached after the commission meeting for 
comment.

But SOBEL noted that she represented plaintiffs who won a suit against a 
Monterey Park ordinance in the 1980s that barred protesters from covering 
their faces. In that case, she said, Taiwanese demonstrators were trying to 
keep their faces from being caught on videotape that would be used against 
them by officials in their home country. In fact, many protesters use face 
coverings in their demonstrations as integral parts of their expression - 
and federal courts have repeatedly struck down laws purporting to outlaw 
anonymous protests.

Scott SHEFFER of the Los Angeles office of International ANSWER (Act Now to 
Stop War and End Racism) said members of his group often used masks as part 
of their demonstrations and probably would continue to do so at the March 
20 protest, slated for Hollywood and Vine. "The best thing to do would be 
for the police to not infringe on the rights of the demonstrators in the 
first place" by needlessly using gas and rubber bullets against the crowd, 
SHEFFER said.

That sentiment was echoed by attorney James Muller, who is representing the 
plaintiff class in the suit set for trial next month. "The idea of banning 
gas masks is perfectly reasonable - if the police department is behaving 
reasonably at these demonstrations," Muller said. "But we saw that these 
officers are very capricious, and not respectful. At least that's what we 
saw at the DNC."

Protesters should be able to wear masks or goggles to protect their eyes 
from rubber bullets, Muller said, noting that one person was blinded by a 
rubber bullet at the DNC and that others have suffered the same fate at 
other protests around the country.

ADENA TESSLER, public safety deputy for Councilwoman Cindy MISCIKOWSKI, 
said the council and the city attorney would make sure that any final 
proposal would take into account First Amendment protections. She said that 
officers who are given the power to tell protesters to remove hoods 
probably would be less likely to throw bottles or engage in other illegal 
activities.

SOBEL said recent rulings have underscored the right of protesters to wear 
masks. Besides, she said, why is it so important to get the laws in place 
before the NBA game?

"Has there been anywhere in the country," she asked, "where there has been 
a riot after an all-star game?" 

lllll
QUOTATION:

"All of us may not live to see the higher accomplishments of an African empire, so strong and powerful as to compel the respect of mankind, but we in our lifetime can so work and act as to make the dream a possibility within another generation"
-<html><A HREF="http://members.aol.com/GhanaUnion/afrohero.html">Ancestor Marcus Mosiah Garvey <i>(1887 - 1940)</i></A></html>

llllllllll
*  //\\//\\ unioNews Newsgroup //\\//\\   *
* http://members.aol.com/GhanaUnion *
*          We're One People         *
*          Join the Chorus          *
-    African Union Shall Succeed    -
=====================================
A luta Continua!

To subscribe to this group, send an eMail to:
[log in to unmask] 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

  a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/unioNews/
    
  b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  [log in to unmask]
    
  c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ATOM RSS1 RSS2