GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:01:22 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (820 lines)
Foroyaa Newspaper Burning Issue
Issue No. 114/2007, 28 - 30 September,  2007

Editorial
No Respect for ECOWAS Court
If the conduct of  the government of the Gambia is to go by, its respect for 
the ECOWAS Community  Court of Justice leaves much to be desired. It has 
persistently failed to appear  before this court to give it’s own side of the story 
relating to the violation  of the human rights of Chief Ebrima Manneh.
On 19 January 2005, Yahya A.J.J.  Jammeh, President of the Republic of The 
Gambia was among 15 Heads of State and  Governments that appended their 
signatures to the Supplementary Protocol that  amended the 1991 Protocol on the 
Community Court of Justice. Article 9 paragraph  4 of this Supplementary Protocol 
states: 
“The (Community) Court has  jurisdiction to determine cases of violation of 
human rights that occur in any  member state.”
The Government of The Gambia was summoned to defend itself  against an 
allegation of violation of the human rights of Chief Ebrima Manneh of  Daily 
Observer. No legal representative appeared on behalf of The Gambia  Government on 16 
July and 26 September. Does this show respect for the community  court or the 
Supplementary Protocol that was signed?
Even where the issue of  jurisdiction arises a competent lawyer who respects 
the law will not boycott the  court but will raise the issue in court. There 
can be no excuse for the  government not to appear in court to defend its human 
rights records. In fact  many can interpret such acts as evading the courts 
because it has nothing to  defend. 
Now the question arises:
How will the Government respond to the  verdict? On 20 November the Community 
Court will deliver its verdict. According  to Article 19 paragraph 2 of the 
protocol on the Community Court of Justice  (1991) the decisions of the court “
shall be final and immediately enforceable.”  Will the Gambia Government 
respect the verdict of the court or will it simply  treat the Protocol and the 
Community Court as thrash? Let us wait for November  20.

Disappeared Journalist Case Set for Judgment
The Community  Court of the Economic Community of West African States 
(ECOWAS) in Abuja ,  Nigeria has set aside November 20, 2007 for judgment on the case 
against the  Gambian government over the “disappearance” of Chief Ebrima 
Manneh, a reporter  for the pro-government Banjul-based “Daily Observer” 
newspaper.
The  three-man panel of judges took the decision following an argument made 
by Funmi  Falana and Olusola Egbeyemi, representatives of counsel for Manneh, 
Nigerian  human rights lawyer, Femi Falana. As usual, the Gambian government 
despite being  duly served with the hearing notice through its High Commission 
in Abuja failed  to appear.
Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA) brought legal action  at the 
Community Court demanding an order to compel the government of President  Yahya 
Jammeh, to immediately release Manneh. 
At the last hearing on  July 16, 2007, the Gambia government failed to make 
an appearance and no  explanation was given.
Manneh “disappeared” a week after the July 2006  African Union (AU) Heads of 
State summit in Banjul . Colleagues of Manneh  witnessed his arrest by two 
plainclothes officers of the National Intelligence  Agency (NIA) at the premises 
of the “Daily Observer”. Since then his whereabouts  remain unknown and the 
Gambian Security agencies and police continue to deny  holding him.
On July 26, 2007, Manneh was placed under guard of  personnel of both the 
Police Intervention Unit (PIU), (a Para-military wing of  the Gambian Police 
Force) and Prison Service at the Royal Victoria Teaching  Hospital (RVTH), the 
Gambia ‘s main hospital, where he had been hospitalised for  treatment of high 
blood pressure. Eye witnesses later reported to have seen him  being transferred 
to a military clinic in Banjul . 

Jones  & Ceesay’s Case
Proceedings Stayed
By Yaya Dampha
The case of Mam  Sait Ceesay and Malick Jones was called at the Banjul 
Magistrates Court on  Wednesday 26 September. When the case was called Cadet A.S.P 
Buba Keita  announced his appearance for the IGP while Lawyer Antounman Gaye 
represented the  two accused persons. In his submission, the prosecutor applied 
for an  adjournment.
He said the magnitude of the case is too high and that it still  needs 
further investigations. He said up to the time he was speaking in court,  the matter 
was still being investigated and that the prosecution needs more time  to 
complete their work. Cadet A.S.P Keita said this is the first time they  applied 
for an adjournment. Keita urged the court to grant them an adjournment  for a 
fortnight. For his part defence counsel Gaye applied for the accused  persons 
to be discharged on the grounds that the court or even the high court  lacks 
jurisdiction to hear the case. He said the issue of jurisdiction could be  
raised any time. He said the accused person should be discharged since evidence  
is not yet given. He said the very law in which the accused persons are charged 
 is section 4 subsection 1 (a) of the Official Secrets Act. Lawyer Gaye 
submitted  that Section 11 of this Act states one can be arrested, detained and 
even be  charged as it has happened in this case, but as he said there cannot be 
any  proceedings in court without a fiat from the (AG) Attorney General. 
Prosecutor  Keita said he agreed with Gaye’s submission, which dealt with section 
11 of the  Act. He said the file had been sent to the AG’s chambers for legal 
advice. He  said this does not mean that the accused persons should be 
discharged, even  though the prosecution is yet to fulfill the requirements.
The defence  counsel said his submission is fundamental; that no further 
proceedings shall be  made if the conditions are not met, noting anything else is 
null and void.  
In his ruling, Magistrate B.Y Camara said, the defence counsel’s submission  
that this court or any other court does not have jurisdiction to hear this 
case  have confirmed the fact that there must be a fiat from the Attorney 
General. He  therefore ruled that the proceedings be stayed until the fiat is  
obtained.

Currency Market Still Volatile
By Bubacarr K.  Sowe
Mam Cherno Jallow, the Chief Executive Officer of The Gambia Chamber of  
Commerce and Industry, has said that the prices of basic commodities would  reduce 
gradually, since the currency market is still volatile.
“You don’t  expect all prices to reduce at the same time. Ii is a gradual 
process. Basic  commodities such as rice, sugar and cooking oil are going down,” 
Mr. Jallow told  Foroyaa on Monday.
He opined that the reason why consumers are not feeling a  huge price 
reduction is that retailers are not axing prices down as the  wholesalers have done.
Mr. Jallow said the depreciation of the dollar; euro  or pound sterling is 
good for both consumers and business people, since it  results in low prices 
thus making businesses flow rapidly. “The depreciation of  the dollar and other 
currencies could be a blessing or could create some  problems as well,” Mr. 
Jallow opined.
He said that the depreciation of the  major currencies would be a problem for 
people who depend on remittances from  abroad.
“Others who will be affected by the depreciating currencies, are  those 
businessmen who export and re-export.”
“Those coming from outside The  Gambia will find the dalasi very expensive,” 
he added.
On why certain banks  are not buying hard currencies, Mr. Jallow opined that 
they might be having  enough hard currencies with them.

Tabara Samba Faces Death For  Murder
By Fabakary B.Ceesay
Madam Tabara Samba who was standing trial for  allegedly murdering her 
husband, Mr. Ebrima Nyan by pouring hot oil on him while  he was in bed sleeping, 
was on Wednesday 26 September convicted and sentenced to  death by Magistrate Pa 
Harry Jammeh of the Kanifing Magistrates Court.
The  judgement was delivered before a crowded court. Enthusiastic onlookers 
who were  eager to hear the verdict stood next to the windows and at the 
vereanda of the  court room. The Inspector General of police represented the state 
while Lawyer  Amie Joof Conteh and Lubna Farrage represented the defence. The 
accused was  holding prayer beads in her hand and murmuring words. She was 
asked to sit down  when Magistrate Jammeh started reading his two-hour marathon 
judgment.  
Jammeh said the accused is charged with murder contrary to section 187 of  
the criminal code. He adduced that the prosecution has called ten witnesses and  
tendered exhibits, which includes, photos, cautionary statement, statement of 
 the deceased and a medical certificate. He noted that the defence called two 
 witnesses, the accused and her brother. Magistrate Jammeh dwelt on the 
evidence  before the court. He asserted that the totality of the evidence before 
him is  that the prosecution has proved their case beyond all reasonable doubt. 
He said  there are two terminologies that emerged in the case that are pouring 
and  splashing. He said the two words deferred in meaning. Jammeh said the 
accused  has admitted splashing hot oil on the deceased because she was provoked 
by the  deceased. He asserted that the accused might have been provoked to 
the point of  losing control of herself. He noted that a spoon full of hot oil 
or even 380ml  of hot oil couldn’t do such a severe harm to the whole body of 
the deceased. “By  watching these photos of the burnt body of the deceased one 
cannot believe it is  a spoonful of hot oil.” He said there are clear 
indications on the photos that  the deceased was lying down instead of standing as 
claimed by the accused. “I  have no doubt that the deceased told the truth that 
it was the accused who  poured hot oil on him while he was in bed. It was the 
intention of the accused  to cause bodily harm to the deceased. The accused 
said she has been cooking  since at a tender age. She is in a better position to 
know the consequences of  pouring hot oil on somebody. “I hereby convict you 
on section 198 of the  criminal code, laws of The Gambia”, pronounced Jammeh.
Mitigating on behalf  of the accused, counsel Amie Joof Conteh said Madam 
Tabara Samba is a 42 year  old who represents the voice of every woman in 
marriage, who are at some point  provoked, beaten and abused in their matrimonial 
homes. Counsel Joof Conteh said  some women are strong enough to endure the 
hardships they encounter while others  are weak. “Tabara Samba is among the weak 
ones who retaliated”. Mrs. Joof Conteh  pointed out that no woman has an 
intention to go into marriage to kill her  spouse. She noted that the court knows 
without doubt that the accused was  remorsed throughout the trial. “What has 
happened, has happened. We are urging  on the most compassionate part of the court 
to have mercy on her. She was a  devoted wife who mothered three sons all 
serving in the service.” 
A bad  mother would not be able to raise such number of children in marriage. 
No  marriage is perfect, no man is perfect and no woman is prefect. We urged 
the  court to convict her with mercy,” said Mrs. Conteh. 
Magistrate Jammeh  lamented that during the trial the accused has alleged 
that she was put in cell  alongside men for days without charges preferred 
against her. He said the  accused is a human being and entitled to her human rights. 
He then ordered the  IGP to mount an investigation into the matter. 
Magistrate Jammeh pronounced the  verdict , noting that it was difficult for him to 
deliver the judgment in the  matter. He said he had observed the accused 
throughout the trial, that she had  shown remorse but that her actions are inhuman. “
Your actions were deplorable,  disgraceful, dishonourable, distressing and 
unpity. You are a deceitful  personality who can create nightmares for men. My 
hands are tied. I hereby  convict and sentence you to death in line with section 
18-2 of the constitution  of The Gambia” said Magistrate Jammeh. 
When the magistrate rose, people  started arguing about the verdict. Madam 
Samba stood motionless in the dock with  her head bowed down. She stood in the 
dock until the crowd dispersed from the  courtroom before she disembarked with 
tears rolling down her  cheeks. 

GFPA Donates Bicycles To Partners &  Institutions
By Annia Gaye &Madiba Singhateh
The Gambia Family  Planning Association (GFPA) on Wednesday 20th September 
2007 donated 210  bicycles worth D357, 000 to partners, individuals, private 
institutions and  government institutions at a ceremony held at the Association’s 
headquarters in  Kanifing.
Speaking at this presentation the president of the Association Mr.  Abass A.S 
Cham expressed his profound gratitude to the volunteers and staff in  their 
effort to complement Government’s efforts.
The International Planned  Parenthood Federation (IPPF) is the main body that 
funds these activities of  GFPA and supports the Association. 
Mr. Yankuba Dibba, Executive Director,  said since 1988 they became part of 
the Family Planning Association, which has a  membership of 182 member 
organisations.
He said over the years they have been  engaged in the collection of used 
phone cards, which they send to their parent  body that in turn send them some 
funds which are utilized to buy these bicycles  that are being distributed to 
their partners. Aja Menge Joof-Gomez, the Vice  President of GFPA and Mrs. Awa 
Janneh-Lewis- Finance & Administrative  Manager did the presentation. Foroyaa is 
one such partner to receive a bicycle  from the GFPA.

Old Man Arraigned For Injury On Cow
By Modou  Jonga
Jerreh Kulai Bojang, a resident of Brikama was on Thursday 27  September, 
2007 arraigned in court for allegedly causing injury to a cow on 26  August. The 
accused is alleged to have willfully and unlawfully chopped the said  cow with 
a cutlass. The cow is said to be the property of one Bakary Dembo  Santang 
Bojang.
When the charged sheet was read to the accused in a language  he claimed to 
understand, the latter admitted to the court that he injured the  said cow but 
that the said animal has entered his orchard. The presiding  magistrate Njie 
ruled that a plea of not guilty be entered for the accused. The  prosecutor was 
sub-Inspector Saine.

FOCUS ON POLITICS
1987  GENERAL ELECTIONS 
OPPOSITION LEADERS LOST THEIR SEATS
We have been  focusing on politics in this column with the objective of 
bringing forth the  past so as to help our young people especially to learn lessons 
from it.
We  have commenced the narration of events from pre-Colonial to 
post-independence  era.
We have gone far into the narration of events up to the 1987 general  
elections. We have stopped where we said Mr. Camara also denied being engaged in  
tribal politics.
Let us continue from where we stopped.
The results  of the March presidential and parliamentary elections was 
announced on the 11th  and 12th of March showing the incumbent Alhagie Sir Dawda K. 
Jawara in the  lead.
The PPP also won the parliamentary contest as well. According to the  PPP 
organ, the PPP won in 31 out of the 36 constituencies whilst the incumbent  
president won the presidential vote in 32 out of the 36 constituencies.
The  president got 59% of the votes cast.
According to the Times, the results of  the 1987 polls were not much 
different from other election results in the Gambia  since independence in 1965.
According to the Times, the victory by Jawara  must have surprised many 
because as they observed, many did not expect such  overwhelming success for the 
Gambian leader. They say this is the first time  since independence that Jawara 
was faced with what looked like a formidable  challenge from two experienced 
politicians, i.e. Mr. Sheriff M. Dibba and Mr.  Assan Musa Camara who were all 
his former Vice Presidents and each was leading  seemingly well established 
national parties.
According to the PPP organ, the  second reason why many felt that Jawara may 
not have succeeded the way he did  was because Gambians had undergone some 
harrowing experiences since the 1982  election brought about by an IMF adjustment 
programme adopted by the Gambia  Government.
The Times agreed that the standard of living following the  government’s 
decision to let the Dalasi float as part of the ERP had generally  declined. What 
was however surprising according to the Nation was that in the  rural areas 
where the inhabitants suffer from lack of progress , both socially  and 
economically , the PPP appeared to be constant .
The times which has  never spoken like this went on to assert that 
subsequently there has been more  than 100 percent drop in the value of the Dalasi as 
well as a general rise in  the prices of goods and services. Salary increases, 
according to PPP Times were  not also allowed during the ERP period.
As far as the elections were  concerned, the PPP organ opined that even 
though the 1982 elections were  conducted under the unusual conditions of state of 
emergency just after a bloody  attempted coup, this year’s elections were held 
in a quiet atmosphere. During  the 1982 elections the leader of the main 
opposition party NCP, had to contest  both the presidential and parliamentary 
elections while in detention because of  allegations of complicity in the failed 
coup.  
According to the opinion  of the PPP Times some observers must also have 
concluded that, having put Jawara  in power for 25 years, there was now need for 
some change, if not by replacing  him altogether then at least by giving him 
less support this time around.
The  1987 election results showed that both presidential candidates lost 
their seats.  The GPP leader has always been in parliament since independence but 
lost his  seat to a young Pa Mandu Sanyang who stood under the PPP Ticket. Mr. 
Sheriff M.  Dibba also lost to Dr Lamin Nafa Saho of the PPP..
Mr. Dibba who was 46 years  at the time lost by a margin of only 95 votes 
whilst Mr. Camara lost by a margin  of 510 votes.
Mr. Sidia Jatta and Halifa Sallah, spokes persons of PDOIS did  not also win 
their seats. However, according to the Times Halifa made a good  attempt when 
he scored more than 1000 votes in 1987.
According to the Times,  both Dibba and Camara would have to consider their 
political future. This  attempt was Dibba’s third time he had been contesting 
for the presidential  elections and lost. He had also lost his constituency 
seat in the last  two-consecutive elections. 
The results also showed that Mr. Dibba managed to  gain 27% of the votes cast 
while Mr. Camara gained 13% of votes cast. 
A  little survey of the results has shown that with the combined force of the 
 opposition, Jawara would have had a tougher time.
The combined opposition in  1987 defeated Sir Dawda Jawara in Banjul 
Administrative Area by a margin of 880  votes. The combined opposition also defeated 
president Jawara in the  presidential vote by 1233 votes in KMC area.
Looking at the overall  percentage, the combined opposition polled 41% of the 
votes cast country-wide.  The sad thing about Gambian democracy is that 
whilst 41% of the Gambian voters  opposed the policies of the government, they had 
to endure with it for another  five years with only 6 representatives in 
parliament. This means that the vast  majority of the opposition supporters had not 
been represented in  parliament.
Sir Dawda fared well mainly in the rural areas. In the Brikama  
administrative area he scored 20,715 whilst the combined opposition scored  15,955 votes. 
In Mansa Konko administrative area, the PPP gained 12,102 while  the combined 
opposition came out with 6555 votes. In Kerewan, the PPP score was  22,871 
whilst the opposition combined came out with 18,41d1 votes. In  Georgetown, PPP 
had 28,510 and the opposition had 13,134.
For Basse , the  president had 23,791 whilst the opposition had 13,530 votes.
In parliamentary  elections the opposition would have captured many places if 
they had combined  their strength.
For example, in Lower Niumi Mr. Dodou Ngom managed to win by  a margin of 
only 51 votes but with the combined votes of Jain Colley Faye GPP  and Jerreh 
Jammeh NCP he would have been defeated by 854 votes.
Similarly Dr.  Lamin Nafa Saho had a margin of 95 votes over Sheriff M. Dibba 
but with the  combined votes of GPPs Abdoulie Jaiteh’s, Mr. Saho would have 
been defeated by a  margin of 19 votes. Again in Eastern Wuli Mr. Seni 
Singhateh was elected with a  majority of 385 votes but with the combined votes of the 
opposition he would  have lost with a margin of 72 votes.
The tactical Alliance suggested by the  PDOIS was rejected by the two main 
parties at the time perhaps because of the  feeling that PDOIS was not only a 
new party but that they had no structures on  the ground and no influence 
whatsoever except the symparthy they may have from  the people that as intellectuals 
who had sacrificed to stand for their  principles.
The other consideration for the lack of collaboration must have  been the 
feeling that with tactical alliance a new party may succeed in  registering a 
seat in the parliament, which may create future obstacles for  them.
What is however not in doubt is the fact that Mr. Dibba especially have  
always been suspicious of intellectuals to the extent of urging his supports to  
distrust them. As for Mr. Camara, he may have been over confident of  winning.
Jawara however lost the urban vote in 1987 to the combined  opposition. Many 
attributed that to the lack of employment opportunities and the  high cost of 
living generally.
Others also attributed it to the February 13th  student disturbances, which 
drew the public’s attention to their vital needs.  According to the press 
release of the students, “the voice of the Gambia  student’s union” the students 
said it has never been their intention to perform  such  a strike, which they 
dubbed “an operation,” but due to unbearable  circumstances which they said  
the Education Department was aware of, but  decided to ignore it.
They said their action was seen to be the only option  to liberate them or as 
they dared said, die in the cause of it.
The students  lamented lack of transportation facilities (very few school 
buses) which they  said made life unbearable for them. The students vowed to 
continue if the police  would not release their colleagues. They also urged the 
authorities to allow  those students who were suspended or expelled to resume 
classes.
See next  issue as we analyze post 1987 elections.

MARRIAGE AND  FAMILY
BLACKMAIL, JUSTICE AND SENTIMENT
Part 7
Detect And  Greg
Detective Desmond gave Greg a full report of his wife. “Your wife is  under 
blackmail. The blackmailer has already received over ten million from  her”. “
What! Who is defrauding my family through my wife?” “Keep calm! I don’t  have 
his identity yet. Don’t ask your wife any question. Blackmailers always  call 
again. We will surely get him soon”. Desmond reassured Greg. “Get him fast  
before I get him”. Desmond gave Greg Daado’s fallen earring.

Daado At Home
Today Daado is at home preparing a delicacy for her  husband. That is a ‘
Domooda’ (a groundnut soup) and ‘findoo’ with mutton. Greg  loved Daado’s 
cooking. “I cannot eat anywhere. My wife is the best of cooks. My  mum would have 
cursed me if she were alive”. “Why?” Daado asked. “Because her  son cannot eat 
any food other than his wife’s. The duo would then laughed over  the joke. 
Daado is now ready to serve Greg his food. The phone rang. Greg took  it. The 
blackmailer changed his voice and mimicked. He asked for Daado and  announced he 
was Angela, and proclaimed to be Daado’s business partners. Greg  became 
suspicious. He firmly believed the voice was that of a male mimicking to  be a 
female. Daado was panicky but she pretended to be calm. “Here take the  phone”. “
Who is it?” she asked. “She said she is Angela but I firmly believed it  to 
be a male voice”. Daado took the phone and pretended to be talking to Angela.  
Justin threatened her and made another appointment with her. All the while,  
Daado pretended to be speaking to Angella her supposed business partner. Greg  
was suspicions. “Give me the idiot! Can I talk to her?” Daado quickly put 
the  phone down. “She had left. Let me go and get your drink”. Greg was not  
convinced.

Daado Visited Her Lawyer
Cynthia is Daado’s university batch mate. Even  though they were in different 
departments they still liked and appreciated each  other. Cynthia now ran her 
own chambers. Daado decided to make her personal  lawyer. She visited Cynthy’
s Chambers. Daado broke down. She intimated Cynthia  with the facts. “I am 
losing it Cynthy! This man is choking me. He had already  extorted over ten 
million from me. And now he have developed another line of  interest”. “What is it?
” Cynthy asked. “He is asking me for sex. I can’t. He has  to kill me first. 
Justin is wicked and mean”. “Does your husband know about the  blackmailing?”
 Cynthy asked. “No! He has not. Infact, Justin is Greg’s business  
associate, his friend”. “Which Justin are you referring to? Is it Docter  Justin?” “
Yes! Docter Justin”. Daado replied. “Docter Justin is a drug suspect.  We are 
trying to set a trap for him”. Cynthia gave her courage. “We will get him  
Mrs. Johnson, we will get him! This time no smart lawyer can set him free”. “Be 
 quick about it! I am losing it!” Daado pleaded.

Desmond Visits Cynthia
Desmond is Cynthia’s friend. She sometimes used  his services as a private 
investigator in some of her criminal cases. Cynthia  discussed about Daado’s 
case. “Who Mrs. Daado Johnson?” Desmond asked. “Do you  know her?” Cynthy 
asked. “Yes! Her husband hired me to investigate her. She is  being blackmailed and 
the blackmailer is her husband’s business associate. Greg  does not know 
about it”. “Fine!” Said Cynthy. “We have to strategize to tackle  the problem. 
You are the best in town. You never disappointed me”. Said Cynthy  “Tell Daado 
to be calm. Tell her we are ready for action”.

Greg Meets Justin
Greg met Justin to discuss a business proposal put  down by Docter. Greg was 
going out with Daado to an executive meeting when he  met Justin who called 
him aside to talk about his business proposal. He  hypocritically apologized to 
Daado. “Please give me a minute Madam to speak to  your husband”. Daado 
became edgy, afraid and worried. She feared Docter will  expose her and make her 
earn the wrath of Greg. Greg agreed to do business with  him for mutual benefit. 
 Greg entered his car. And as Daado tried to enter  Docter spoke into her ear 
and irritated her. She ignored him and entered her  husband’s car.

Daado Pays A Visit To Cynthia
Daado was agitated. She cried over  Cynthia’s shoulders. Cynthia took five 
minutes to calm her nerves. “Justin  almost told Greg everything”. “How? What 
do you mean?” “Exactly what I said”.  Desmond entered Cynthy’s office. “Sit 
down Desmond”. Daado got scared. “Good  morning Mrs. Johnson”. “Good morning!”
 Daado replied. “How did you know me?”  Cynthy came into the discussion. “
Well Daado! This is the detective I told you  about. He is the best in town”. 
Desmond answered her question. “Greg gave me a  contract to investigate you”. 
Daado was surprised. “Investigate me? Why?” “Your  husband knows you are being 
blackmailed. What he does not know is by who? He  does not know that his 
friend is the blackmailer. Keep calm! Don’t let your  husband suspect you know 
anything. Everything is under control”. Daado agreed.  “we have laid a trap for 
the blackmailer”. Desmond left. Daado cried. Cynthy  counseled her. “Take it 
easy on yourself. Everything is under  control”.

Daado Goes To Justin’s House
Daado took the bull by the horn. She was  quite agitated. She visited Justin’
s house to retrieve the video cassette. She  got a spare key and opened the 
house. Daado in her hurry put the house upside  down. She searched everywhere 
and found nothing.

Worst Case Scenario
What did she see? Justin and Greg entered the house.  Justin was surprised. “
Your house is upside down what happened?” Greg asked. “Is  it burglary?” “I 
don’t know. I am confused as well. What is happening?” They  heard foot 
steps. They waited. Who opened the door? Daado opened it and bounced  over Justin 
and Greg. She almost fainted. She was shocked. She ran away. Greg  was 
flabbergasted. Daado left her bag behind. “This is a zig-saw puzzle! What is  my wife 
doing in your house Docter?” Justin answered rudely. “Question your  wife! 
What is your dumb wife doing in my house? Look at how she put my house  upside 
down!” Greg became disappointed and dumbfounded. Greg started to go.  Justin 
called Greg back. “No business talk?” Greg turned back and started to  leave. “
If you’ll not talk business, come back and collect your wife’s shit on  your 
way out”. Greg collected Daado’s back and started to leave. He turned to  
Justin and said. “I’ll be back!” “Am waiting!” Justin replied. As Greg left  
Justin jumped up and glee. He is vain and mean.

Disability Does not  Mean Inability
CHALLENGING DISCRIMINATION
Culled from “A Handbook on  Mainstreaming Disability” Published by VSO
We have found that the most  effective way to challenge discrimination is for 
disabled people to demonstrate  that they can participate in society. Telling 
people that discrimination is  wrong cannot match the impact of seeing 
disabled people working, bringing up  children or performing similarly respected 
roles within their community.
VSO  volunteers who have impairments can also play this role in some 
situations,  although it is important not to focus this responsibility on disabled  
volunteers, who are recruited for their professional skills and expertise, not  
because of their impairment. In addition, non disabled people may not take the 
 ability of a disabled person from a rich country to participate as a sign 
that  disabled people from their own community can do same.
Non-disabled people’s  biggest contribution is to support and empower the 
disabled to play this  self-advocacy role. This can be as simply providing 
mobility assistance or other  enabling supports, or even pencil and paper, as in one 
case study from Papua New  Guinea. VSO volunteers and programme staff also 
have a role to play in building  the capacity of DPOs to express their 
priorities.
We can all be role models  of more equitable relationships between disabled 
and non-disabled people. The  simplest way to do this is just to interact with 
disabled people in public,  especially in wider social events, for example 
encourage non-disabled and  disabled children to play together or inviting a 
local disabled adult to  accompany us to a social gathering. For example, one of 
VSO Indonesia’s partner  organizations working with children with autism 
regularly takes the children out  shopping. Staff encouraging the children to ask 
for what they want, and have  conversations with the children in public. This 
has led local shopkeepers  recognizing and interacting directly with the 
children, rather than their  caregiver.  
It can be difficult to challenge discrimination, especially  when it is seen 
as having roots in local or national culture. People who were  brought up 
within that culture, including national staff, may find it hard to  raise these 
sensitive issues, or may see attempt to address them as an attack on  their 
culture. Expatriates, including VSO volunteers, are rightly cautious of  imposing 
inappropriate values or undermining the culture of their host  country.
However, culture is not uniform or static. Every culture is made up  
different streams, and these streams are constantly interacting with each other,  
changing and being changed. The cultural values attached to disability and  
impairment are not always negative for example. The traditional values stories  
often attribute particular wisdom to blind people. Societies that have recently  
experienced wars of liberation tend to link disabled people with veterans, who  
are often admired and supported with states benefits, although this may 
largely  benefit men with visible impairments such as missing limbs.
Disabled people  are part of their country’s culture too, and their 
perspective is as important  as anyone else’s.  We have mentioned that it is more 
effective to  demonstrate disabled people’s participation than to tell people to 
change their  attitudes.  This is why it is so important for disabled people to 
be  actively involved in every stage of disability mainstreaming.  Many  
disabled people are already working for change themselves, and VSO has a  
legitimate role to support them.
While attitudes are clearly important, it is  generally more effective to 
focus on changing behaviour.  Neither VSO nor  anyone else is in a position to 
police people’s thoughts.  However, if we  come across discriminatory or 
disrespectful behavior, or hear people using  derogatory language, it is possible to 
ask them why they are behaving like  that.
It will not help to alienate colleagues and partners. It is important  to 
find ways of approaching these issues that are appropriate to the context,  based 
on relationship of trust with people around us. We also need to consider  our 
own attitudes and values – these are shaped by culture and experience like  
everyone else’s, and it is essential to recognize where we are coming from as  
well as where we are trying to go.
INTERACTING WITH DISABLED PEOPLE
Many  non-disabled people are ill at ease when interacting with disabled 
people. They  may be nervous about accidentally causing offence, or simply 
embarrassed because  they have not spent much time with disabled people.
There are some simple  rules that can help those who are uncertain about how 
to behave. The main  principle is to treat everyone with courtesy and respect, 
including disabled  people. Treat each person as an individual, with her own 
way of  interacting.
Other general guidelines  include:
·           Speak  direct to the person, in the same way as you would to 
anyone else, not her  interpreter or  assistant.
·            Speak normally and clearly. Don’t rust your words, shout or 
mumble. If you are  talking to a person with limited hearing, check that she can 
understand  you.
·           Get on the  same eye level, and look the person in the eye 
(assuming this is actually  appropriate). This is the best way of making sure that 
your attention is on her  and what she is  saying.
·           Don’t  treat a disabled adult like a child. Talk to her like an 
adult. A person’s  impairment may prompt your concern – but don’t restrict her 
 freedom.
·           Offer  assistance, but don’t help someone without asking first. 
If you are helping  someone, always do what she asked you, not what you think 
is  best.
·           Try not  to stare if something about the person seems unusual to 
you – while many  disabled people are used to being looked at, staring will 
make anybody  self-conscious and uncomfortable.  
·           Avoid language  which you know is rude or derogatory. When 
talking about people, refer to them  by their name rather than their  impairment.
·           Be  polite. Treat the person the same way as you would treat 
anyone else. 
VSO  GHANA: PRSP CONSULTATION
The World Bank invited the Ghana federation of the  disabled (a VSO partner) 
to a civic society videoconference in April 2005 with  Jim Wolfensohn, the 
president of the World Bank. GFD invited VSO to participate  as well, along with 
other organisations working in disability. Civil society  groups in Senegal, 
Peru, Japan and Belgium also participated.
Before the  videoconference, MacDuff Phiri, VSO Ghana’s disability programme 
Manager,  arranged a meeting of all the invited organisations to agree on a 
common  position. This preparation was vital in presenting a coherent message. 
While the  other country groups discussed a wide range of development issues, 
the Ghana  team focused on including disability in development  planning.

HEALTH AND NUTRITION BANTABA
Raising Awareness On  Malaria
By Yaya Bayo
The Scourge of Malaria has become an outstanding  public health concern at 
this time of the year around the continent,  particularly sub-Saharan Africa. 
Research suggests that about 200 million people  get malaria in tropical 
countries every year, and about 2 million die of  it.
A single-cell organism called plasmodium causes this deadly epidemic.  
Interestingly enough, the female of the Anopheles Mosquito spreads it. The mode  of 
transmission of the single-cell organism should be known by all and sundry  
with a view to putting contingent measures in place to avert its transmission  
from an infected person to a non-infected one.
The plasmodium lives in the  salivary glands of an infected female Anopheles 
Mosquito. The mosquito feeds on  human blood. When it bites in order to take a 
meal of blood, the saliva enters  the blood taking with it the parasites. The 
blood carries them to the liver  where they enter the cells, feed and 
multiply rapidly. Later the parasites  invade the bloodstream and enter the red blood 
cells. Inside the red blood  cells, the plasmodium grows again and 
reproduces. The new parasites then break  out, destroying the red cells and producing 
poisonous substances. This causes  very severe fever with high temperature and 
sweating. Eventually the fever  passes but returns again and again as long as 
the parasites remain in the body.  Next time the infected person is bitten by a 
mosquito, some of the parasites are  taken into the mosquito’s stomach. Here t
hey continue to multiply. They break  through the stomach wall and pass in 
the bloodstream to the salivary glands.  They wait here until they are passed on 
to the next healthy person the mosquito  bites.
Symptomatically, the typical attack of malaria has three stages. It  begins 
with a feeling of cold, headache and weakness. There is shivering for 15  
minutes to one hour. Very serious fever, often 40°c or more follows this. The  
person is weak and sometimes not in his right mind. The fever may last several  
hours or days. Then the person begins to sweat as his temperature comes down.  
People who have malaria often and over a long period of time may develop an  
enlarged spleen and anemia. Anyone who suspects he/she has malaria or suffers  
from repeated fevers should report to a health centre.
Malaria can be  controlled, if everyone co-operates. All the control measures 
should be  practiced at the same time.
One method is the destruction of the mosquito.  The adults can be killed by 
spraying surfaces on which they may settle with  benzence hexachloride (BHC) or 
dieldrin. Aerosol spray may be used to kill them  in the houses. However, it 
is best to use those, which do not contain  chloropfluoro carbons (CFC’s).
Moreover, the larvae and pupae (young) can be  destroyed by spraying on the 
surface of pools and marshes where mosquitoes  breed. The oil lowers the 
surface tension of the water, causing the larvae and  pupae to sink and drown. 
However, the recent biolarvicide exercise undertaken by  the officials of the 
Department of State for Health in the gutters and other  drainage outlets of Banjul 
is a worthwhile venture in the crusade against the  malaria scourge in the 
country. This is a laudable initiative, which is embraced  by all, especially 
the residence of Banjul. The Department of State for Health  also promised to 
extend similar ventures to other parts of the country where the  population of 
mosquitoes is quite noticeable. Notwithstanding, this should be  done before 
rather than after the “Malaria Season” begins in earnest in the  country.
Additionally, fish such as topminnow can be introduced into the  water to 
feed on the larvae and pupae. The breeding grounds too can be drained  or 
completely filled with sand. 
Another highly placed traditional way of  preventing mosquito bites is by 
sleeping under insecticide treated mosquito nets  (ITNs) and also covering 
windows with a fine-mesh screen to keep them out. It is  gratifying to note at this 
point that, the Association of Youths Against Malaria  (TAYAM), UNICEF. 
Department of State for Health’s National Malaria Control  Programme component and 
other partners recently embarked on bed net dipping  campaign in Western Health 
Region to curb the menace of malaria. This campaign  which is conducted free 
of charge is aimed at preventing our children, pregnant  women and the general 
populace at large from the scourge of malaria.
In  addition, wearing long sleeved shirts and trousers in the evening in 
mosquito  infested areas will also help prevent bites on arms and legs. Smearing 
repellant  creams on exposed skin may also prevent bites. More importantly, 
taking regular  weekly doses of preventive (prophylaxis) drugs will tremendously 
help in the  prevention process.
Finally, malaria is treated with anti-malarial drugs, but  unfortunately, the 
parasite seems to have developed resistance to some of these  drugs. 
Therefore, a trained medical worker’s advice should be sought before  taken these 
drugs.

In Gambian Pair Clash in Austria
Pa Saikou  Get the Better of Modou Jange
By Modou Nyang
Pa Saikou Kujabi’s SV Josko  Fenster Ried defeated Modou Jange’s SCR Altach 
3-0 on Wednesday pushing them  deeper into the relegation dogfight. Ried 
completed a league double against  Altach who currently occupies 9 position in the 
10 team Austrian Bundesliga  liga.
Jange’s Altach put up big fight in the first half before the home side  
rallied in the second to score 3 straight goals, Hamdi Salihi firing a double  and 
Daniel Toth completing the rout. But Pa Saikou did not end the match as he  
was sent off in the 78th minute for a second bookable offence.
Modou Jange  playing in attack, first tested Ried’s goalkeeper with a 11th 
minute strike and  Hans-Peter Berger responded well to the challenge. Jange cut 
through the packed  Ried defence and forced a powerful shot towards goal but 
Berger was up to the  task, parrying to ball to his right for a corner. Berger 
who before the start of  the match was presented with an award by the Austrian 
National League for best  goalkeeper for the previous season, showed that his 
heroics that led to the  award were not a fluke either. Altach mount pressure 
on the Ried defence and in  the 16th minute, Roland Kirchler forced another 
wonder save from Berger. Berger  showed his class by thwarting another 
succession of chances from Altach striker  Patrick Mayer in the 18th and 33rd 
minutes.But  when Altach felt they had  got the breakthrough just before the end of 
the first half when Karsten  Hutwelker beat Berger to slot home, the central 
blew offside.
Ried having  survived a first half from a determined Altach side, made no 
mistake after the  resumption of hostilities in the second, as leading scorer 
Hamdi Salihi fired  them into the lead just 10 minutes into the half. Altach 
regrouped in a bid to  avoid a repetition of their first leg home defeat to Ried 
back in July. And as  they fought to keep their area off the threat of Altach, 
Pa Saikou got sent off  for repeated offences. But the loss seemed to have 
tilted in Ried’s favour as  Salihi fired back to score his second late on in the 
86th minute to secure all  three points before Toth, rounded up the day with 
the third in the 90th.
SV  Josko Fenster Ried this season completed played a double against SCR 
Altach  scoring six times. Ried won their first leg encounter 3-2 away to Altach 
in  July, with Pa Saikou Kujabi scoring Ried’s opener in that epic  encounter.

3 New Magistrates Sworn In Office
By Fabakary B.  Ceesay
Three new magistrates were on Wednesday 26 September sworn into  office. The 
trio is, Mrs. Kumba Sillah Camara, Mrs. Sainabou Wadda Ceesay and  Mrs. Sagar 
Cecelia Jahateh. They were all members of the Bar, but they later  decided to 
join the magisterial bench.
In her opening remarks, the President  of the Bar Association Mrs. Amie 
Bensouda noted that in The Gambia, the  Magisterial bench is mostly drawn from the 
ranks of law graduates. She said  these three did their Bar training and are 
qualified legal practitioners. She  noted that the three magistrates come to 
the bench with a much richer  experience, as hitherto all of them are barristers 
and solicitors of the High  Court of the Gambia. Mrs. Bensouda indicated that 
for forty years, the bench is  still agonizing over judges, magistrates, and 
state counsels. “We are still  wondering around from jurisdiction to 
jurisdiction begging for lawyers who would  serve our people,” said Mrs. Bensouda.
In her statement, the Attorney General  and Secretary of State for Justice, 
Mrs. Marie Saine Firdaus said she had worked  with all the three sisters when 
the trio was defence counsels while she was a  prosecutor. She pointed out that 
there is no doubt that the newly appointees are  fit and proper persons to 
serve in the magistracy. SoS Saine Firdaus advised the  newly appointed that the 
path they have chosen is an honourable one and requires  each of them to 
execute their responsibilities with dedication, commitment and  diligence without 
fear or favour, affection or ill will to the best of their  abilities. She 
said the magistracy has been playing a pivotal role in the  administration of 
justice. She threw light on the volume of cases adjudicated at  that level. The 
Attorney General indicated that the task of a magistrate is more  challenging, 
but are in line to ensure widely access to justice. “I would also  want to 
assure you that the Department of State for Justice will continue to  work 
closely with the judiciary in ensuring a better and more efficient  administration 
of Justice, ensuring that Gambians serve as lawyers, judges and  magistrates 
all over the country to make access to justice a reality and bring  it closer to 
the people,” she said.
The Chief Justice, Abdou Kareem Savage,  highlighted the government’s policy 
to meet 95 per cent Gambianisation by the  year 2011. Chief Justice Savage 
noted that their interventions a re to train and  develop the Cadre of 
magistrates to prepare them for higher judicial functions.  The Chief justice explained 
the three points, which a magistrate should be  doing. She said they should be 
competent, shall have the ability to utilize the  knowledge from their 
academic and professional training to deliver justice.  “Competence requires that 
judicial officers employ the analytical,  interpersonal, leadership, managerial 
and administrative skills”. Justice Savage  added that the second part is to 
do justice. “Doing justice entails playing the  game by the rule. It implies 
fairness, insistence on the due process and the  maintenance of the rule of law. 
Doing justice is ensuring that justice is not  only done but is seen to be 
done. You cannot do justice without adhering to the  rules,” said Justice 
Savage. He noted that the third thing is to do justice for  no other consideration 
but for justice itself. Savage told the newly sworn-in  magistrates that 
motivation as magistrates and Judicial officers should at all  times be, to deliver 
justice. “You should not be driven by power, arrogance or  material 
consideration”. He said if one does justice but your motivation is for  other things 
order than justice, then your conscience will not allow you to  thrive. Justice 
Savage finally said “You the judge; if you are for the people,  the door of 
goodness would be opened, if you are not for the people, the door of  evil and 
chaos”. The vote of thanks on behalf of the newly appointed magistrates  was 
delivered by Magistrate Sainabou Wadda Ceesay. The ceremony was held at the  
chief Justice office.

Heavy Storm Hits Busura
By Modou  Jonga
A heavy rainfall accompanied by heavy storm over the weekend resulted  in the 
destruction of buildings in more than eight compounds at Busura in the  Kombo 
Central. The heavy wind has also demolished the buildings of Fioretti  
Nursery School and the Lower Basic Cycle School at the said place. Some of the  
corrugated iron roofs of the affected buildings were detached by the strong  storm.
Speaking to this reporter, the village head of Busura, Omar Faye  lamented 
that a total of eight compounds and the youth centre were seriously  affected by 
the heavy storm on the 15 and 16 September 2007 respectively.  According to 
Mr. Faye, neighbours are currently sheltering some of the victims  of the heavy 
wind. He urged the Government and other philanthropic organisations  and 
individuals to assist the victims.
The principal of Busura Basic Cycle  School Mr. Nfally Badjie said five 
classroom blocks including the library and  his office were destroyed by the heavy 
storm. Mr. Badjie said the effects of the  storm are grave, noting it will 
seriously derail the learning process. He said  classes would be congested 
because of inadequate space to accommodate the  pupils.
The head of FIORETTI Nursery School, Mr. Alhagie Malick Camara, noted  that 
the roof of the two-classroom building was removed by the storm on Saturday  5 
September. He said this happened around 2 pm. He said the school clinic is  
affected by the storm. He lamented that some stationeries and ten bags of cement 
 were damaged by the storm. Mr. Camara noted that learning at his school 
would be  halted due to lack of sufficient space to accommodate the pupils. He 
further  urged the authorities to assist his school so that early childhood 
education can  be offered satisfactorily. Many victims lamented the scale of the 
damage caused  by the heavy storm.  
A compound owner and a victim, Abdou Jarju, noted  that he and his family 
woke up late in the night when their corrugated iron roof  was completely removed 
by the wind. Mr. Jarju lamented that his building was  flooded due to the 
heavy down pour. He said their neighbour accommodated his  children. He stated 
that due to the flooded house, two bags of sugar and three  bags of rice got 
soaked in the water. Mr. Jarju called on the government and  other organisations 
to urgently help them out of the present predicament. 
A  shopkeeper, Musa Dem lamented that the roof of his shop was removed; that 
his  shop was flooded with water and as a result, bags of sugar, rice and 
other  commodities got soaked in the water. He noted that the total cost of the  
affected commodities is estimated at four thousand dalasis. Another victim Ida  
Faye noted that the heavy storm has destroyed part of her building; that one 
bag  of rice and three bags of cement got soaked in water when the roof of her 
 building was removed and destroyed by the heavy storm.

GTB Donates  To Disaster Victims
By Modou Jonga
Guaranty Trust Bank, Gambia Limited on  Monday 24 September, 2007 donated 
twenty bags of rice, ten bags of sugar and  plastic buckets worth over twenty 
thousand dalasis to various disaster victims.  The ceremony was held at the Bank’
s Sub-branch in Brikama
In his welcoming  remarks, the Public Relations Officer of Brikama Area 
Council Mr. Seringe Joof  noted that the donation came in the wake of an appeal 
launched by the Western  Region Disaster and Relief Committee following numerous 
natural disasters that  hit Kerewan, Brikama, and other places. Mr. Joof 
commended the Management of  Guaranty Trust Bank for the benevolent gesture. 
In his statement, the  Governor of Western Region Mr. Abdou F.M Badjie who is 
also the Chairman of the  Western Region Disaster and Relief Committee 
lamented the alarming rate of  natural disasters in the region. He expressed hope 
that the donation will uplift  the morale of the disaster victims.
While commending the Guaranty Trust Bank  for the service it is rendering to 
the public, the Regional Governor, assured  the Management of GT/Bank that the 
donated items will reach the affected  victims. Mr. Badjie commended the 
members of his committee for their unflinching  cooperation. The donated items 
were handed over by a representative of GT/Bank,  Mr. Bittage to Governor Abdou 
Badjie. The Chairman of Brikama Area Council, Mr.  Ousman Gaye thanked the bank 
on behalf of the recipients.

In Pirang  Land Trial, 
Accused Persons Discharged
By Modou Jonga
Senior  Magistrate E. F. M’bai of the Brikama Magistrates Court on Tuesday 
25th  September 2007 discharged fourteen accused persons, all of them residents 
of  Pirang in the Kombo East.
The fourteen who pleaded not guilty were dragged to  court by the state on 
30th July 2007 for allegedly entering the farm of M. G  Fielder on 28th July and 
damaging the animal feed planted by the said M. G.  Fielder.
When the case was called on Tuesday 25th September, Magistrate M’bai  noted 
that the case was adjourned till 25th September. He stated that the  prosecutor 
told the court that his witness was not yet in court and as such, the  case 
was stood down and later deferred.
Magistrate M’bai noted that the  prosecution witness and the prosecutor ASP 
Camara were absent. He stated that no  reason was advanced for the absence of 
the prosecutor. He said all the accused  persons were present in court that day 
except the third accused  person.
Magistrate M’bai noted that it is the ultimate responsibility of the  
prosecutor to proceed with his case and be resolved to prove it beyond  reasonable 
doubt, but that the prosecutor has done the contrary. He accordingly  discharged 
all the accused persons on the charges preferred against  them.





************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com


To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]


ATOM RSS1 RSS2