GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ndey Jobarteh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Oct 1999 00:52:59 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (280 lines)
Jabou,

This is well said and no one could have said it better.  We will follow this
issue through cause this is about ones identity and birth right.
We will always continue to be our sisters and brothers keepers/watchers.


The Struggle Continues!!!
Ndey Jobarteh


-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 30 October 1999 23:46
Subject: Jammeh's government seizing Gambian passports/RESPONSE


>Fellow  Gambians,
>
>Well, l  have received a private communication from Mr Tombong Saidy,
>informing me that if l  give him the name of the individual whose passport,
>along with that of his family  was illegally siezed by ambassador Johnson,
he
>will be  pleased to  follow this through. He also stated that:
>
>"I can assure you that this is not a government's policy neither is it a
>directive from the President."
>
>My  response to Mr Tombong Saidy is this:
>
>That  while l appreciate his offer to follow this  particular case through,
>this is not just another public relations matter to be settled by him
behind
>closed doors, nor  will such a move guarantee others whose  passports  have
>been illegally seized, that they will  be returned, or  yet those  whose
>names  have been put on some secret list by the Jammeh government, that
they
>will not have their rights  violated in the future by this paranoid
>government.
>
>It is not  enough to dispatch Mr Saidy to do a "quick fix" as  seems to be
>the case whenever the human rights violations that are a trademark of this
>administration come  to light,  and even then, only in cases that may
>potentially counter  the  facade  they are trying to pedal to the
>international community.
>
>If the government is saying that the seizure of passports of Gambians both
at
>home and abroad  is not  a policy  of theirs, (and it  should not  and
>cannot  be since they have  no right  to do this) and that they were  done
>by individuals seeking to ingratiate  themselves to the President, then let
>them acknowledge this publicly to  the Gambian people, both at home and
>abroad.Let  them also assure  us   that they will direct all  those
overseas
>missions who have illegally seized passports,  to re-issue those passports
>and contact the owners. While  at  it, let  them also inform  us  that
they
>do not keep a list of so called  enemies of the  government, or if they do,
>let  them state  what resulted  from these people being labelled  enemies
of
>the government. Since  the president has  stated  publicly here in the U.S
>that his is a democtratic government where there is  freedom of the press,
(
>and the  evidence proves the contrary)  one would naturally also assume
that
>this  goes hand in hand with  freedom of speech, and as such daring to
voice
>ones' opinion about the policies of this government should not  result  in
>them being put on some secret list,  but  instead  should serve as a
>mechanism whereby they can learn  what the concerns of the  people are, and
>use this information to come up with ways to serve them in a  better
manner.
>If  on  the other hand,  there is some crime that has be committed by these
>people, then we do have a system of justice to deal with  criminals, do we
>not? Let  them state the crimes committed by these people, and if they are
>legitimate,  then let them appeal to the  governments  of the countries
where
> these individuals  are resident,  to  extradite these people to  The
Gambia
>to  face the charges. However, it  of course goes without saying that such
>charges will have to  be authenticated, (  and for your information,
>expressing one's opinion   does not  qualify as a  crime against the state
>in most places in the World) and assurances given that these people will be
>given a fair trial once extradited. If they can  substantiate  the reason
for
>such a list,  then why not conduct  these affairs in a manner befitting a
>respectable government?
>
>The shameful behaviour of the NIA agents who accompanied Jammeh to the U.S,
>stated  loud and clear  to the international community that repression of
>those whose right  it is to  disagree  with how  this administration
conducts
>their affairs  is the common practice. In broad daylight, NIA agents  in
the
>company of Jammeh  proceeded to rough up Gambians  who wanted to enter the
>premises at the Freedom Forum breakfast , and had to be reminded by the U.S
>secret service that this was America where people  are free to voice their
>opinions.
>l guess they got used to doing this to Gambians at home and   getting away
>with it, so they forgot where they were. If  they try  to physically
>manhandle Gambians for attempting to attend a venue for the president and
>voice their disagreements  with his  policies  here in the U.S, then one
can
>easily believe that they  will and have drawn up a list of people deemed
>enemies just  because they point out all the atrocities that are  commited
>against  the people  on a daily basis.
>
>Let us look at the dissolution of the July 22nd movement. First, we have to
>say that we are very thankful that the Gambian people  will not be subject
to
>the lawlessness  that was  practiced by this bunch of thugs,  but only if
it
>is indeed true that they have been disbanded. While the president alleges
>that he was unaware  of their illegal activities, this is hardly believed
of
>a goverment that seems to, or at least has attempted to have their eye  on
>every move made by the people.Just ask those journalists who are rounded up
>for any article disapproved by the governnment. The forceful subjugation of
>the people  to carry an  ID card,  and the manner in  which it has been
>conducted is one  such attempt in my opinion.
>
>Take the case of Baba Jobe, for example, who drew a gun at an international
>airport, thereby endangering not only the lives of Gambians, but also  that
>of international visitors to our country, and definitely qualifying us as a
>lawless country, and proceeded to assault a police officer and his
superior.
>The attack on  the superior was said to have occured in the presence  of
some
>high ranking government officials,  who had to intervene  to rescue the
>supervisor. Did  the said officials report the incident to the president,
and
>if so,  why is it that instead  of punishing Mr Jobe, the police
officer';s
>superior  was fired from his Job.? On  the other hand, did  the high
ranking
>government officials fail to report this to the president  and why? Perhaps
>they are well aware they they serve a tyrant who only wants to hear what is
>favourable, and will take it out on you if you bring any news contrary to
>this. Or is it possible that these police officers got fired  and while the
>whole World heard about it, the president did not? Harldy believable.
>
>Let us hope that Jammeh's trip to  the U.S  was an  eye opener for him, in
>that he saw that no one  wanted  to be identified  with a  government that
>makes  standard  practice of oppressing their citizens,  and  no one will
>take them seriously, no matter what  type and how much "window dressing"
they
>put in place to fool  the  people. Just  ask his friends and  employees in
>the U.S  who scurried around trying to arrange meetings with government
>officials as  well as officials of international agencies to no effect. The
>only people they were  able to meet with on capitol hill was a list of
right
>wing Republicans whose legacy is  that  they  made  a career  of blocking
>every piece of civil rights legislation that has come before the U.S House
>of Representatives and Senate  since  the Kennedy administration.,  but  l
>guess in  their desperation  to arrange something for him, anyone will do,
>otherwise, perhaps their jobs would have been next on the chopping block.
>
>If the government has  embarked on a  "house cleaning " campaigne   to get
>rid of their tarnished image, then let them clean up everything,  and  show
>the people that they mean it,  and not just continue this "emergency
disaster
>relief" policy of sending Tombong Saidy to do  some  cosmetic  cover-up,
or
>pretending that the thugs that they let loose on the people were doing
their
>thing without the knowledge  of the government. l  believe that paranoia
has
> led this government to  embark on a campaign to terrorize and subdue the
>Gambian people  in hopes that this will save them, and  keep  their reign
of
>terror in place   indefinitely. Those who are wise know that falsehood
cannot
> endure forever. The wollof have a saying that" If you do what is right,
and
>say  what is right, then you will sleep very soundly at night".  If
paranoia
>is the order of the day for this government, then they must know  that they
>are not  doing and saying what is right by the people  who  they purport
to
>be serving. Those  governments  that endure  do not do so by deviousness,
>rampant  opression  and terror, but by exercising their duties of office
>competently,  fairly and honestly,  and within the constitution of the
land,
>to the extent that the people see  clearly that they have  capable  people
in
>place,  and thus  want to keep them in place by re-instating them through
>the ballot  box. Anything else is just a temporary solution that is sure to
>crumble.
>
>Jabou Joh
>
>In a message dated 10/28/99 5:09:51 AM Central Daylight Time,
>[log in to unmask] writes:
>
>Dear  Jabou Joh,
>
>I read your email with great pain and I would be very pleased to follow
this
>through if you could provide me with the names of the individuals
concerned.
>Many a times people do things they think would satisfy the President (eye
>services), while damaging the image of the Government in the process. I
>would like you to provide this information in private.
>
>I can assure you that this is not a government's policy neither is it a
>directive from the President. I am looking forward to hear from you.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Tombong Saidy
>
>[log in to unmask] (chernob jallow)  wrote:
>
>Hi Jabou,
>
>I read your revealations on the above subject with utter dismay. And
>suspicion. Talking about a "Jammeh list" of individuals abroad who are not
>in the good books of the APRC government, gives me a poignant reminder to
>what somebody at State House told me earlier this year: there exists a list
>of Gambians abroad who are deemed "enemies" of the APRC government. My
>informant alleged that the List emanated from the State House. He also
>cautioned me not to visit The Gambia because he said my NAME was also on
>this List. There is no way I can verify this information; but when I mail
in
>my passport to the Gambian embassy for renewal in a few months time,it will
>be clear if I will be meted out a  treatment similar to what was done to
>those you mentioned in your expose'. Let's see.
>
>Cherno B. Jallow
>Wayne State University
>Detroit, MI
>
>
>In a message dated 10/30/99 2:24:58 AM Central Daylight Time, [log in to unmask]
>writes:
>
>Aunty Jabou,
> I am not sure if renewing passports of Gambians at the Embassy is that
much a
> problem for those who might be listed in the APRc "black books," but I can
> confirm to you and brother Cherno Baba that it is true that some are
listed.
> I have first hand info on some of these and the memo was written by the
then
> Director General of NIA and it was posted at all ports of entry.
> Anyway, this was before the last elections. Recently, I was told that it
is
> no more being observed, but I personally do not buy into that.
> Back on the passport issue, I know people who are listed in that "book"
and
> they had no problem extending their passport expiration dates. And these
are
> people who walked in to the embassy to do it. One thing observed by all
those
> who visited the embassy for that purpose is that the employees there are
real
> civil servants. Of course not the same thing was said about Johnson, so it
> might just be something personal between him and your friend.
>
> Ousman Bojang.
>  >>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>
>To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
>Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2