----- Original Message ----- 
From: Ndey Jobarteh 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: NADD RESPONSE TO UDP/NRP ALLIANCE


Hi Sidibeh,

I see your point but i just could not hold the taste to comment on it. This is allwhat they do, they always lick documents that are confidential. Can you believe even when NADD had meetings in Gambia before the seperation information where licked to Jammeh's office?

I really want this coalition to wokr but from what i saw at home on the ground the past four months. I don't see any chance of it.



I am now finally back to Norway.

Take Care

Ndey




------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From:  Momodou S Sidibeh <[log in to unmask]>
  Reply-To:  The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
  To:  [log in to unmask]
  Subject:  Re: NADD RESPONSE TO UDP/NRP ALLIANCE
  Date:  Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:37:46 +0200
  >Fellow Compatriots,
  >
  >Just what exactly is the purpose of publishing these correspondences 
  >between the opposition leaders on the net?
  >True, we are all of us in this, and access to information is often 
  >invaluable, especially now that deadlines are swiftly approaching. 
  >But whatever the gains, the effect of publicity is to help demonise 
  >one leader while the other appears beyond reproach, thereby making a 
  >rapprochement between the two blocks even more difficult. All the 
  >while the possibilities of a coalition which is more important than 
  >either NADD or the UDP/NRP alliance becomes even more remote than 
  >formally.
  >I suspect that it was this reason that led to the NADD executive 
  >expressing confidence in and delegating responsibily to Hon. Halifa 
  >Sallah to conduct all negotiations in private with Ousainou Darboe 
  >until when a decision is reached. To our dismay, we all learnt very 
  >publicly, that Mr. Amat Bah betrayed this privacy.
  >
  >Similar circumstances produced difficulties during the initial 
  >leadership selection process, when information that should have 
  >remained confidential (in my opinion) found its way into Pa Nderry 
  >Mbai's online paper.
  >
  >I cannot see any purpose for such publicity deserving more merit 
  >than the secrecy that is called for before an agreement is reached.
  >
  >Cheers,
  >Momodou S Sidibeh
  >
  >¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
  >To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the 
  >Gambia-L Web interface
  >at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
  >
  >To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: 
  >http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
  >To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
  >[log in to unmask]
  >¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤