GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Jul 2007 20:14:00 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (976 lines)
Foroyaa Newspaper Burning Issue
Issue No.  77/2007, July 4 – 5 2007

Editorial
MAGISTRATE JAWO STUNNED  COURT
DEMONSTATION OF INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY
The Director of Public  prosecution appeared for the state and Counsel Lamin 
Jobarteh appeared for Fatou  Jaw Manneh. The court was full to capacity. A 
witness appeared to be waiting to  be called. The court clerk called the court to 
order. Fatou Jaw Manneh took her  position.
The Magistrate opened his file and read what appeared as a decision  to 
transfer the case for want of jurisdiction. The Magistrate gave reasons why  he had 
to refer the case back to Banjul where most of the evidence is emanating  
from.
He closed his file and got up to leave. Caught by surprise the court  clerk 
stood up to ask the court to rise for the Magistrate to leave. A stunned  DPP 
remained silent. A stunned defence counsel rose to ask whether that was all.  
The Magistrate re-echoed his decision. Being in a state that one could safely  
describe as a no nonsense mood, the magistrate left the court with lightening  
speed. The stunned audience started to find out what the Magistrate had  said.
In a way this is another delay. As the old saying goes justice delayed  is 
justice denied.
In another way one is compelled to believe that the  decision reflects the 
dictate of conscience and justice.
In short, courts are  the guardians of the rule of law. Rule of law can never 
prevail in any society  where there are no independent and impartial 
tribunals to interprete, administer  and protect the law and where there are no law 
enforcement agents who enforce  the law without fear or favour, affection or ill 
will. Section 120 of the  Constitution subsection 3 states that “In the 
exercise of their judicial  functions, the courts, the judges and other holders of 
judicial office shall be  independent and shall be subject only to this 
constitution and the law and, save  as provided in this chapter, shall not be 
subject to the control or direction of  any other person or authority”.
Life and liberty are the most precious rights  on earth. Those exercising 
judicial powers should know that the lives and  liberties of accused persons are 
in their hands. Miscarriage of justice or its  delay can cost life and liberty.
Wherever the life and liberty of the accused  is at stake the courts should 
deliver justice expeditiously.
This is  precisely why section 124 of the Constitution states that “It shall 
be the  object of every court to deliver its decision expeditiously.”
Evidence should  be given and final addresses made without delay. Judgments 
should follow without  delay. 
The Director of Public prosecutions is given immense powers to assist  the 
courts to ensure speedy justice. Section 85 of the Constitutions empowers  the 
office holder to initiate and undertake criminal proceedings, take over and  
continue any criminal proceedings and discontinue, any criminal proceeding  
initiated and undertaken at any stage before judgment is delivered.
The DPP  should always be bound by the spirit of section 120 subsection 4 of 
the  Constitution which states that “This government and all departments and 
agencies  of the government shall accord such assistance to the courts as the 
court may  reasonably require to protect their independence, dignity and  
effectiveness.”
In our view, proceedings should be undertaken when there is  evidence to 
prove cases beyond reasonable doubt.
Once enough evidence is not  available cases should be withdrawn to avoid the 
huge cost in material and human  resources associated with such proceedings.
Delay in cases for want of  diligent prosecution can cost an accuse person 
greater injustice than the wrong  the person is alleged to have perpetuated. In 
that case, justice is served by  discontinuing prosecution.
If any DPP operates by such principles justice  will always be done and be 
seen to be done.

MARABOUT DAWDA CEESAY IN THE  DOCK
By Abdou Jeli Keita
One Dawda Ceesay, a marabout, is standing trial  at the Banjul magistrates’ 
court for allegedly obtaining money by false  pretence, contrary to section 285 
of the Criminal Code. The trial proceeded with  the testimony of the 
prosecution witness, Abdoulie Corr, an accountant’s clerk  at the Banjul City Council 
(BCC).
In his testimony, the prosecution witness,  Abdoulie Corr, told the court 
that sometime in May 2007, he met one Abdoulie  Camara while he was from his 
place of work and Camara said he was on the way  with his master (Dawda Ceesay) 
with whom he had lost contact with. The witness  said he gave him D10 to buy 
something to eat. He said Camara said he is a  “talibe” (student) of a very 
powerful marabout (Dawda), whom he said would help  him, because in his words, “It 
is very uncommon to come across good people like  you.” He said, the “talibe”
 then took his mobile phone and told Dawda (the  accused), what transpired 
between them and later the accused person told them to  meet at Gamtel house in 
Banjul. While at Gamtel house, he said the accused  person (Dawda Ceesay) told 
him to buy two white sheets of paper, two candles and  charcoal. He said the 
accused then told him to put everything on one white  sheet.
According to him, he put everything on the white sheet, ranging from  his 
mobile phone, and wallet containing over D2000 dalasi in the white sheet  after 
which he said, the accused person (Dawda) wrote on the other white sheet  and 
told him to go with his talibe (student) to the mangrove swamps (near Gambia  
High School) to bathe with the written items. He said while bathing in that  
place, he heard a strange voice saying “Abdoulie Corr, you have met a very  
powerful marabout (Dawda), he is one of my representatives in your small world,  
take bath now! Go on now! You will see changes in your life, I mean positive  
ones”.
He said the strange voice asked him his age, he said he answered  twenty-nine 
(29), and then the strange voice told him to multiply 29 by D150 and  take 
the sum of money (about D6,000) and two bags of rice, to a school headed by  the 
accused’s (Dawda Ceesay) father at a region in Senegal. He said the said  
amount is for charity. He said the strange voice then asked him what he wanted  
in life and he answered, “Knowledge and wealth”. He said the strange voice 
then  said “Surely, you will get knowledge and wealth. Plentiful in supply, but,  
Abdoulie Corr, your name is in the spirit world and from now on, you must not 
 communicate what transpired between you and the God father of the spirit 
world.  Should you disobey the command from the God father, your family shall 
cease to  exist. I mean they shall die one by one”.
The prosecution witness (Abdoulie  Corr) said, he was frightened by this 
terrifying voice. He said the strange  voice asked if he was ever told to give an 
animal with four legs as charity and  he answered yes. He said the strange 
voice told him to do that now.
He said  days after, the accused (Dawda) told him to go back to the same 
place and take  bath. Whilst at the place, he said, his talibe (student) told him 
to pray two  “Raka,” after which the strange voice appeared once again and 
said, a special  prayer had been done for him at ‘KARBALAH’ (a place of worship 
in Iraq) last  night.
One week later, he said, the accused told him to give him D50, 000,  after 
which he would make him a millionaire with the power of the spirit world’s  God 
Father. He said he told Dawda that he does not have such a huge sum of  money; 
that he had only D28, 000. He said, he gave D28, 000 to the accused  (Dawda) 
and still he is neither a millionaire nor did he get his money  back.
When asked if he has anything to contradict what the prosecution  witness 
said, the accused (Dawda Ceesay) said he has nothing to say. The trial  is 
adjourned to a later date in July. 

WITNESS TESTIFIES IN SHERIFF  MINTEH’S MURDER TRIAL
By Yaya Bajo
The ongoing murder trial of Dodou  Janneh, alias Dodou Boy, proceeded at the 
Bundung Magistrates’ Court, presided  over by Magistrate Amina Saho-Ceesay on 
Monday with the testimony of the first  prosecution witness (PW1), Ebrima 
Minteh.
Ebrima Minteh told the court that  he shared the same mother and father with 
the late Sheriff Minteh and that he is  a student at Grade 7. When he was 
asked by the prosecutor 772 Samateh to tell  the court what transpired on the 9 
day of May 2007 between the hours of 8pm and  11pm at London Corner, he said 
that while sitting at a shop which belongs to one  Ebrima Njie, a police vehicle 
drove passed him. The witness said that the  vehicle then stopped; that four 
people were on board the van including the  accused whom he identified as Dodou 
Janneh. He said at that moment, his late  brother (Sheriff) was coming out of 
their compound. “I called his attention,  then he stopped.” He said when the 
officers saw him, they approached him and  conducted a search on him, but 
they could not find anything on him. Continuing  his explanation, he said his 
late brother (Sheriff) was coming out of their  compound when one of the officers 
shouted on him, and he ran away. He added that  while Sheriff was running, 
the accused person and one Immigration officer  pursued him up to a point where 
the Immigration officer stopped, but the accused  person continued chasing him.
Ebrima Minteh added that while his late brother  was running, his mobile 
phone fell down and he stopped and picked the phone. He  said the accused then got 
hold of him and dragged him near one mechanic garage  where the accused 
person took out a knife and stabbed him (sheriff) in the  thigh. The witness said 
that after the accused stabbed his late brother (  Sheriff), he (accused) 
wanted to take his money from him, but the deceased  resisted. He said the accused 
also asked him (witness) to hand-over to him  Sheriff Mintehs’ mobile phone, 
which was handed to him by Sheriff, but he  (witness) vehemently refused. 
Further testifying, Ebrima noted that the accused  later dragged his late brother 
and stabbed him again on the buttocks and he  (Sheriff) fell down. He said 
while his late brother was lying down, one of the  officers joined the accused to 
raise Sheriff’s leg and asked him to get up, but  Sheriff told them that he 
could not stand up. “At this point, Sheriff told me to  go to the shop and call 
Ronne for him and when I was coming with Ronne, I saw  the accused person 
moving away and I told Ronne that this is the very one who  stabbed my brother, 
then we followed him and Ronne held him by the shirt and I  held him by the 
trousers,” he adduced.
Ebrima added that they then conveyed  the accused person to where his late 
brother was lying down. He said that at the  scene, one of his brother’s came 
with other people and carried Sheriff to the  gate of their compound.
He said Sheriff was later taken to Serrekunda Health  Centre. He added that 
while they were going with the accused, he took off his  shirt, produced a 
knife and threatened to stab anybody who comes closer to him.  He said the accused 
person then ran into one of the compounds and a  reinforcement of police came 
to the scene and arrested him.
When asked by the  prosecutor as to what happened to his brother after he was 
evacuated to  Serrekunda Health Centre, the witness before responding to the 
question, wept  continuously in the witness box which prompted the trial 
Magistrate to allow him  time to control his emotions.
After regaining his composure, the witness  responded that his late brother 
was referred to RVTH where he was pronounced  dead. “He never returned home”, 
he told the court. Ebrima further stated that  the matter was reported to the 
Serrekunda Police Station where his statements  were recorded.
At this point, the defence counsel, Mr Tambedou, made an  application to 
cross examine the witness in camera, arguing that the witness is  a child and that 
he, the counsel, has a job to do and that he should not be seen  to as 
sympathising with the witness. His application was granted and the matter  was 
adjourned to Tuesday 10 July, 2007 for PW1 to be cross examined in  camera.  

FATOU JAW MANNEH’S CASE TRANSFERRED TO BANJUL  MAGISTRATES’ COURT
By Fabakary B. Ceesay
Senior Magistrate Buba Jawo of  the Kanifing Magistrates’ Court yesterday 
ruled that journalist Fatou Jaw  Manneh, who is standing trial at his court on 
sedition charges, cannot be tried  at Kanifing, but instead at the Banjul 
Magistrates’ Court.  
In his  ruling, Magistrate Jawo indicated that the offences were committed 
while the  accused was in the USA and that the whole investigation in the matter 
was  conducted in Banjul. He said the first witness stated before the court 
that a  complaint on the matter was lodged at the NIA office in Banjul and that 
they  browsed the internet at the same place and downloaded the article in 
their  office at Banjul. Jawo added that the second witness also said he went to 
the  NIA headquarters in Banjul where the said article was given to him to 
read. Jawo  ruled that the Kanifing Magistrates’ Court has no jurisdiction to 
try the case  and that he will transfer all the files pertaining to the 
procedure to the  Banjul Magistrates’ Court.
According to Magistrate Jawo, the procedure is in  line with Section 61(1), 
and 62 of the Criminal Code. However, both the counsels  were astonished by the 
move of the Magistrate, as both counsels and the court  attendees stared at 
the Magistrate as he was preparing to rise up. The defence  counsel, Lamin S. 
Jobarteh, rose up to ask the Magistrate about his move, but  the Magistrate who 
appeared to be in a hurry to go into chambers said, “That is  my ruling on 
the case”.
Journalist Fatou Jaw Manneh has been standing trial  at the Kanifing 
Magistrates Court since April this year. At the inception of the  case, the defence 
counsel has challenged the jurisdiction of the court to hear  the case, but the 
objection was overruled by Magistrate Jawo who said that Fatou  can be tried 
before him at the Kanifing Magistrates’ Court. 

HALIFA  SALLAH CLARIFIES ON AU GRAND DEBATE ON A CONTINENTAL GOVERNMENT
By Bubacarr  K. Sowe
Halifa Sallah, a politician and an ex-member of the Pan African  Parliament, 
has clarified issues surrounding the feasibility of forming a  continental 
African government, as the debate winds-up in the Ninth Ordinary  Summit of the 
Assembly of Heads of States of the African Union in Accra,  Ghana.
Below we reproduced the statement of Mr. Sallah delivered at a press  
briefing at his office, the Peoples’ Centre for Social Science Research, Civic  
Awareness and Community Initiative in Churchill Town,  Serrekunda.
EXCERPTS
I am compelled by the dictates of conscience and  continental interest to 
convene this Press Conference to clarify issues  surrounding the Grand Debate 
currently taking place in Ghana regarding the  founding of a Union Government and 
State for Africa. This briefing is most  significant because of my conviction 
that media practitioners must have a clear  understanding of the origin and 
essence of a debate before they can give  accurate reports on it.
Apparently sufficient sensitisation on the grand  debate is lacking. This is 
why media reports tend to give the impression that  Colonel Muammar Qhaddafi 
of Libya is pioneering the cause of a United States of  Africa against the 
wishes of the other African Heads of State. Some have created  a dichotomy by 
labelling some of the leaders as pioneers of a gradualist  approach while Qhaddafi 
is reported to be among those who are calling for the  immediate 
establishment of the Union. 
Clarification 
It is important for  everyone to realise that African Integration is one of 
the fundamental  objectives of the African Union. The transformation of the OAU 
into the AU gave  birth to many declarations on democracy, political, 
economic and corporate  governance and the introduction of mechanisms to monitor 
compliance with shared  values and principles of state administration, such as the 
African Peer Review  Mechanism. 
The key instruments which fully reflect the shared values and  goals of the 
African states are:

a.        the Lagos Plan of Action, and the Final Act of Lagos  (1980);     
b.      the African  (Banjul) Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights      
(1981);
c.       the African Charter for  Popular Participation in Development  
(1990);

d.      the Declaration on the Political  and Socio-Economic Situation in 
Africa and the Fundamental Changes Taking Place  in the World (1990); and
e.      the African Charter  on the Rights and Welfare of the Child  
(1990).
f.                    the Abuja Treaty establishing the African Economic  
Community  (1991);
g.      the 1993 Cairo Declaration  Establishing the Mechanism for Conflict 
Prevention, Management and  Resolution;
h.       the Protocol on the  Establishment of an African Court on Human and 
Peoples’ Rights  (1998);
i.        the 1999 Grand Bay  (Mauritius) Declaration and Plan of Action for 
the Promotion and Protection of  Human  Rights;
j.                     the Framework for an OAU Response to Unconstitutional  
Changes of Government
(adopted at the 2000 OAU  Summit in Lome, Togo, and based     
on the earlier decision of the 1999 Algiers  OAU Summit); and

k.       the Conference on  Security, Stability, Development and Cooperation 
(CSSDCA) Solemn Declaration  (2000); and
l.        the Constitutive Act  of the African Union  (2000)

The African  States made the following commitment as a matter of  principle:
”We, member  states parties to the aforementioned instruments, reaffirm our 
full and  continuing commitment to these and other decisions of our continental 
 organisation.”

I will make sure that copies of these documents are kept  in the library of 
the Peoples’ Centre for the benefit of anyone who wants to  study the issue of 
integration more closely. This will confirm to you that the  opinions being 
expressed that Colonel Qhaddafi is manipulating the rest of the  leaders fall 
far behind the reality. 
In short, take it from me that the  Grand Debate is not about gradualism or 
spontaneity in establishing a Union  Government. The Grand Debate emanated from 
the demand for realism. 
For your  information, the rapid marginalisation of the continent is what 
compelled the  African leaders to establish the AU. Since its establishment a 
critical mass is  emerging which is dissatisfied with the slow progress in 
implementing  Continental Charters, Conventions, Declarations and Resolutions and 
the paltry  steps taken to achieve integration. 
The AU Assembly of Heads of State formed  a Committee of Seven Heads of State 
and government, in 2005, to look into the  feasibility of founding an African 
Union Government. The Committee of Seven  Heads of State commissioned a study 
which was tabled at the AU Summit in Banjul  in July 2006.
The Report entitled “Study on an African Union Government  Towards The United 
States of Africa” became the document of the Assembly of  Heads of State 
which is relied on to conduct the Grand Debate.

Proposal  for the Grand Debate 
After the 7th Ordinary session of the African Union  held in Banjul, the 
Heads of States met in Addis Ababa for the 8th Ordinary  Session of the Assembly 
of Heads of State. At the Session the Heads of State  agreed to hold the 9th 
Ordinary Session of the Assembly of Heads of State in  Ghana and confine the 
agenda mainly on the debate on the feasibility of founding  an African Union 
Government and State. Herein lies the genesis of the Grand  Debate. 
The Addis Ababa Summit also called for consultations to be done at  national 
and regional levels in preparation for the debate.
The Pan African  Parliament established a task force to study and make 
recommendations to  parliament on the issue.
I was a member of this task force which submitted  its report for a debate. 
The parliament subjected the report to a debate on the  15th and 16th May 2007 
and made its proposal. Civil society groups have also  held their own 
consultations.
This Grand Debate therefore is a continental  initiative to find a way 
forward to unite Africa. It should not be boxed within  the old Afro pessimistic 
paradigm. Africa needs a way forward. Apathy and  scepticism is not one of the 
options. If we disagree with the recommendations of  the study we should give 
alternatives.
The Recommendations and conclusions of  the study are as follows:

CHAPTER THREE
TENTATIVE ROAD MAP OF THE  UNION GOVERNMENT

115.  The proposed Road Map is divided into three  phases of equal time 
frame. The Initial Phase, starting after the decision of  the Assembly at its next 
session of the African Union, will be devoted to  establishment of the Union 
Government (i.e. steps and processes that are  necessary for the Union 
Government to function immediately). The Second Phase  will be devoted to making the 
Union Government fully operational in all its  components and to laying the 
constitutional ground for the United States of  Africa. The Third and final Phase 
will aim at putting into place all required  attributes of the United States 
of Africa at the levels of the states, the  regions and the continent.

116.  The proposed Road Map also takes  into account the principles of 
gradual incrementalism and multi-layered  approach. In this respect, all proposed 
strategic areas of focus need not be  covered at the same time or all items of a 
given area. Also, during the three  phases, actions are required 
simultaneously at national, regional and  continental levels. The actions indicated in 
each phase represent those that are  essential in the process leading to the 
final objective of the United States of  Africa. They do not include regular 
activities carried out at various levels  within and outside the Union.

117.  Finally, the time frame of the  Road Map would depend on several 
factors, including first and foremost, the  political will and commitment of Union 
Members. It will also depend on  particular circumstances of individual 
potential members of the Union. In this  regard, all segments of the population in 
Union Members should first understand  the importance of the Union Government 
project, and then participate effectively  in its realization. Also, the Union 
Government should be fully operational in  all its components before it is 
transformed into the United States of  Africa.

118.  Taking into account these factors, a 3- year period is  recommended for 
each phase, so that the United States of Africa would be formed  by the year 
2015. Thus, African countries, acting collectively and with  solidarity, would 
endeavour to reach the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) set  in the 
Millennium Declaration of the General Assembly of the United Nations. The  three 
phases of the Road Map are outlined below.

3.1 INITIAL PHASE:  ESTABLISHMENT OF THE UNION GOVERNMENT 2006 -  2009

3.1.1.           Continental level

o       Selection of  strategic areas of focus of the Union  Government
o       Decision on the mode of  finance of the Union Government
o        Adoption of the revised functions of the Assembly, the Executive 
Council, the  Specialised Technical Committees, the Commission and the Permanent  
Representative Committee
o       Decisions on  the establishment of the Courts of Justice and Human  
Rights
o       Decision on the revised  Constitutive Act
o       Decision on the launch  of the studies on the financial  institutions
o       Decision on the  establishment of the AIB
o       Decision on  the final status of NEPAD in the  Commission
o       Decision on the  representations of the Union Government in other 
parts of the world, including  in particular in the African Diaspora;
o        Consultations and decisions on the Free Movement of Persons, Rights 
of  Establishment and  Residence

3.1.2.           Regional Level

o       Rationalization and  harmonization of the RECs
o       Harmonization  of RECs’ instruments, institutions, programmes and 
operations -with the Union  Government objectives and Road-Map
o        Popularization of the Union Government project in the  region
o       Development of a monitoring  mechanism for the implementation of the 
Union road-map at regional  level

3.1.3 National  Level


o       Harmonization of Union  Members instruments, institutions, programmes 
and operations with the Union  Government objectives and Road Map
o        Building national constituencies for the Union  Government
o       Popularisation of the Union  Government Project
o       Development of  national monitoring mechanisms for the implementation 
of the Union  road-map,

3.2. SECOND PHASE: CONSOLIDATION OF THE UNION GOVERNMENT  2009-2012

3.2.1 Continental  Level
o       Creation of the ACB and  AMF
o       Restructuring of remaining  continental organs
o       Initiation of the  process of consultation for and preparation of a 
Draft Constitution of the  United States of Africa

3.2.2 Regional  Level
o       Adoption of measures towards  effective free movement of Persons’ 
Rights of Residence and  Establishment
o       Consultation on the draft  Constitution of the United States of Africa

3.2.3 National  Level
o       National conventions on the draft  Constitution of the United States 
of Africa

3.3 THIRD PHASE: ESTABLISMENT  OF THE UNITED STATES OF AFRICA  2012 - 2015

119. The period would be  devoted to the adoption by Union Members of the 
draft Constitution of the United  States of Africa. During the period, all 
continental institutions would be fully  operational, including in particular the 
financial  institutions.

120.  Finally, elections at all required levels  (continental, regional and 
national) would take place during this period. The  United States of Africa 
would be officially constituted and recognised as such  in the world community of 
Nations. 

CONCLUSION
121.  This study  has shown that, in spite of the difficulties encountered in 
the process of the  search for unity and purpose of action by African 
countries over the years, the  continent is uniquely poised to achieve this objective 
through the Union  Government project. This is so because of the shared 
values and common interest  of African countries, as well as the holistic approach 
to its development  challenges since the LPA and the FAL to the Union 
Government project, through  the Abuja Treaty, the African Union and NEPAD.

122.  The proposed  architecture of the Union Government is such that it 
would enable Africa,  through its own organs and institutions, to look for 
solutions to its  development first from within the continent. This would make its 
participation  in international affairs more effective and productive, for the 
benefit of the  world community. It would also strengthen the partnership in 
which Africa has  been entering for the past several years with various world  
regions

123.  The framework is also flexible as it would enable all  potential Union 
Members to participate in the Union Government soon after its  adoption. 
Indeed, both the principle or incrementalism and the multi-layered  approach are 
such that all potential Union Members could participate in the  Union Government 
at all levels (national, regional and continental). Thus, the  need for 
consensus would not be required since potential members could become  active 
members at any level as and when they are ready. In September 9, 2009, an  
evaluation of the progress achieved in Africa’s integration process should be  
conducted.

124.  The ultimate objective is to achieve, through  political, economic, 
social and cultural integration, a strong multi-racial and  multi-ethnic United 
Africa, based on the principles of justice, peace,  solidarity, and the 
judicious exploitation of its human and natural resources.  This United Africa would 
thus be in a position to promote its values and  interests, and take advantage 
of the opportunities of an increasing globalised  world. It will represent 
the concretisation of the vision of the African  Union.

I have written a book entitled “Treatise on the Founding of a  Federation of 
African Republics” which is to be published. I have given the  following reco
mmendations as a realistic way forward.

The Establishment  of a Federation of African States in Phases 
Phase one
The summit should  achieve the following task in Ghana in 2007
1. Adoption of the name, nature  and form of the Union. I propose that Africa 
continue what Lumumba and Nkrumah  started by giving commitment to build a 
federation of African states which could  be given the distinct name The 
Federation Of African Republics (FAR) to make it  clear that Africa wishes to go 
beyond the point reached by the European Union to  build a Federation of African 
States.
2. Adoption of a Solemn Declaration by  all Heads of States to establish the 
Federation without hesitation or hindrance  within a realistic time frame to 
be agreed at the Accra
Summit.
3.  Declaration of commitment by all states to ratify the protocol 
establishing the  African Court of Justice so that it can be put in place in 2007.
4. The  commissioning of an internal review exercise of mandates, functions 
and  structures by all the organs or institutions of the AU as well as the  
elaboration of a strategic plan involving any upgrading in mandates, functions,  
structures, material and human resources to evolve into an institution of the  
federation The Regional Economic Groupings should also be part of the review  
exercise All institutions should be required to submit their reports to The 
AU  Commission for presentation and discussion at the 2009 summit so that a 
task  force can be commissioned by the summit comprising experts on all the 
organs to  draw up a realistic plan of action for forward movement towards the 
building of  the Federation of African Republics.
5. Adoption of a resolution to establish  the Central Bureau for 
Documentation and Statistics with immediate effect to  serve as a depository of all the 
instruments, relevant statistics, policies  programmes and projects of the AU 
and the respective States to facilitate  continental planning and implementation 
of the objectives of the  Union

Phase two
I The 2009 Summit should be set aside to review the  reports and 
recommendation of the Various institutions and Organs of the AU and  adopt their short 
term, medium term and long term proposals including their  requirements in Human 
and Material resources. This should be followed by the  establishment of a 
Commission of Jurists to study all the recommendations and  make proposals for 
the amendment of the Constitutive Act and all relevant  protocols to bring them 
into conformity with the requirements of an evolving  Federation of African 
Republics. This should be followed by the consolidation of  the three arms of 
the state, that is, the Executive, the Legislature, the  Judiciary and their 
respective branches or sectors and their  operationalisation

Phase Three
The 2010 Summit should be devoted to  the adoption of a revised Constitutive 
Act and supporting instruments which  should have all the features of a 
Republican Constitution to gradually move the  Union towards a Federation. Election 
of Pan African Parliamentarians should take  place in 2010 on the basis of 
Universal suffrage so that they will owe no  allegiance to National Parliaments 
and be fully devoted to the Legislative and  other over sight functions of the 
Union. The consolidation of the African Court  of Justice should be 
complimented with the establishment of the criminal  jurisdiction of the African Court 
On Human and Peoples Rights and the  appointment of a Prosecutor General to 
facilitate trials for war crimes,  genocide and crimes against humanity under the 
Union.

Phase four
I The  2011 Summit should be devoted to the review of progress in institution 
building  and performance as well as the assessment of human and material 
resource needed  to achieve set targets
2.This Summit should give mandate to the Commission of  Jurists to engage in 
consultation on a continental basis to help prepare a draft  Constitution for 
the Federation of African Republics for adoption on the 50  anniversary of the 
founding of the OAU at its head quarters in Addis Ababa in  2013.
3.The Summit should further establish a Commission of experts on  Economic 
,Social, Political and cultural matters to prepare a Comprehensive  African 
Economic Recovery and Development Programme for the Federation of  African States 
to be reviewed and adopted on the 50th Anniversary of the  founding of the OAU 
in 1963

Phase five
I The 2012 summit should be  devoted to a review of progress made in the 
preparation of a draft Constitution  and the Report on the Comprehensive African 
Economic Recovery and Development  Programme for the Federation of African 
Republics. The Pan African Parliament in  collaboration with ECOSOC should involve 
the Regional Economic groupings and  their Parliamentary Fora as well as the 
National Parliaments, Civil  Society  and the people at large groupings in a 
continent wide debate  regarding the content of the draft Constitution and The 
Comprehensive African  Economic Recovery and Development Programmes for the 
Continent.
2 The Session  should also be devoted to a Review of the progress made by all 
institutions of  the AU in fulfilling their respective mandates and the 
harmonisation of their  activities to further the objectives of the Union.

Phase six
2013 will  mark the 50th Anniversary of the founding of the OAU. This Summit 
should be held  in Addis Ababa and should be marked by the adoption of a 
Federal Constitution  and the African Economic Recovery and Development programme 
for the Continent.  This should mark the beginning of the founding of the 
Federation of African  Republics.

Phase Seven
2014 should be a year of sensitisation. The Pan  African Parliament and 
ECOSOC should be provided with enough material and human  resources to sensitise 
the African peoples on the provisions of the draft  Constitution and the content 
of the proposed Comprehensive African Economic  Recovery and Development 
Programme The sensitisation should culminate with the  holding of an All African 
Peoples Conference comprising of representatives of  women , youth, human 
rights, trade unions, media , disabled, political parties  and other stake holders 
on the continent in preparation for a simultaneous  referendum in all African 
States to approve or reject the Constitution of the  Federation of African 
Republics.
The 2014 summit should focus on the reports  of the civil society bodies and 
a declaration should follow adopting a day to  hold the referendum in 2015 to 
decide the faith of the draft  Constitution

Finally
Once the referendum leads to the approval of the  Constitution the 2015 
Summit should proceed to establish a task force to prepare  an implementation 
programme for the operation of the federation for approval by  the 2016 Summit. The 
process of establishing the structures of a Federation of  African Republics 
should take place according to the agreed  plan.

Nkrumah, Lumumba and Cabral call on us to do our own research,  write our own 
history and interpret continental and world events to enhance the  clarity, 
dignity, liberty and prosperity of the African people.

The aim  of this Press Conference is to answer to their call from the  graves.

Thank you.

Halifa Sallah
People’s Centre for Social  Science Research, 
Civic Awareness and Community Initiative 

COURT  ISSUES ARREST WARRANT FOR REPATRIATED MIGRANT
By Modou Jonga
Magistrate  E.F Mbai of the Brikama Magistrates’ Court has on Monday 2 July, 
2007 issued an  arrest warrant for one Bakary Ngum, a repatriated Gambian 
migrant from Spain,  for failing to appear in court.
The accused is standing trial at the said  court for allegedly violating 
section nine of the Public Order Act on the 28  October, 2006, at the Banjul 
International Airport.
According to the  particulars of the offence, the accused person is alleged 
to have conducted  himself in a manner that is calculated to cause a breach of 
the peace at the  said place and date, while having been at that moment 
repatriated from Spain  together with many other Gambians.
Before issuing the arrest warrant,  Magistrate M’bai noted that the trial 
involving the accused did not proceed  since November last year. According to 
Magistrate M’bai, the accused person has  been present in court on numerous times 
with the prosecution failing to  proceed.
Readers could recall that the accused person was part of thirty  repatriated 
Gambian migrants arraigned at the said court, sometime last year,  and charged 
with malicious damage to the properties of the Gambia Civil Aviation  
Authority on 28 October, 2006. The accused who pleaded not guilty, was later  
discharged on the charge preferred against him by the said court after the  failure 
of the prosecution to effect two separate arrest warrants issued by the  said 
presiding magistrate for the other accused persons who were absent in  court.
The presiding magistrate further ruled that the accused be kept in  custody 
till the next adjourned date of 9 July, 2007. 

TOBACCO  KILLS.....
FOROYAA BANS SMOKING IN ITS PREMISES!
By  Sarjo-Camara-Singhateh
In this edition of Health and Nutrition Bantaba, the  columnist would first 
of all congratulate the Foroyaa Newspaper and its  management for declaring all 
their premises a smoke free zone. We will  therefore, have Ousman Sillah and 
Suwaibou Touray, both editors at the Foroyaa  Newspaper, to share their views 
on this issue with us.
HNB: Mr. Sillah, why  this bold step?
Ousman Sillah: Yes, this is a welcome development, Sarjo! As  you can see 
around us, there are ‘no smoking’ signs pasted on the walls in the  Foroyaa 
offices. Although, the majority of those who work at the Foroyaa, that  is, the 
editors, typists and reporters are non-smokers, there are few reporters  who do 
smoke cigarettes. Therefore, with this restriction signs to make the  premises 
a smoke free environment, we are trying to help them to muster the  courage 
to quit smoking which is, indeed, a life threatening habit. As you know,  
cigarette smoking is not only life threatening to the cigarette smoker but also  to 
the non-smoker as well who is rendered a passive smoke. Infact, findings have 
 shown that both the smoke that the cigarette emits and that which is exhaled 
by  the smoker are more harmful to the non-smoker.
I am not advocating against  cigarette smoking out of mere theory or what 
other people told me or I have  read, but because of my personal experience. I 
was once a smoker and a heavy one  at that. It is this experience that gives me 
the advantage and first hand  knowledge to talk about tobacco smoking, because 
it helps me, albeit  unfortunately, to know about all the hazards associated 
with it, be it health,  economic or social.
I know it’s not easy for smokers to wake up, let’s say,  one fine morning 
and say ‘I have now quitted smoking’. The addiction is so  overwhelming that it 
makes it less easy. Yet, it is equally not impossible to  stop smoking. The 
testimony to this is that all the former smokers have done it  without any 
fatal consequences. Therefore, there is no plausible reason why the  present 
smokers cannot equally do so. All that it requires is for one to muster  the 
necessary courage and determination and to counsel oneself and weigh the  advantages 
against the disadvantages.
HNB: How do you see young people  smoking? What motivates them into smoking?
Mr. Ousman Sillah: Smoking among  young people is all part of the stereotype 
culture that is  characterised  by influences and imitations, negative or 
otherwise. There are some youth  milieus where to be a non smoker means risking 
being counted out. In such  environments, one only fits or associates when one 
is a smoker, thus satisfying  the ‘birds of the same feather’ description. 
Although one can resist the  temptation and get along with them, if one is 
resolved. Some young people  indulge in smoking so as to demonstrated to society 
that they are matured enough  to be accepted and counted as adults. Others also 
start smoking out of mere  curiosity.
HNB: How do you see the WHO Frame-work Convention on Tobacco  Control?
Mr. Ousman Sillah: Well, it is indeed a good idea to have a  regulatory 
framework or rules that aim to control or protect people from  exposure to the 
hazards of Tobacco smoking. We need no smoking zones in our  homes inorder to 
protect our children and the other family members from being  exposed to the 
health hazards of smoking; we need no smoking zones in  workplaces, public places, 
such as hospitals, schools, public transports, etc.  In effect, we need 
everywhere to be observed as a no smoking zone. However, this  objective and desire 
cannot be attained by mere regulations and enforcement  measures. Smokers need 
to be sensitized, counselled, encouraged and persuaded to  quit the life 
threatening and life negating habit, as found is tobacco smoking  and other 
intoxicants. Infact, most of those who smoke are fully aware of the  serious 
economic, health and social implications and consequences of smoking.  What this is 
showing is that the knowledge alone may not be sufficient enough to  help some 
of them take the bold and brave decision to stop smoking. Some of  these 
people cannot alone or by themselves summons the will that is needed to  enable 
them escape the overpowering addiction to tobacco smoking.
HNB: What  do you say to those who send children to buy cigarettes for them?
Mr. Ousman  Sillah: We need to encourage parents and adults who normally send 
children to  buy cigarettes to stop the practice, as it can very well serve 
as a gateway that  legitimizes the smoking habit. This practice alone can send 
the wrong signal by  showing the child that there is no danger in tobacco 
smoking, since the adult he  or she views as a role model, is seen doing it.
HNB: From your own viewpoint,  what do think Tobacco can do to a human being?
Mr. Ousman Sillah: Tobacco  smoking is not only associated with health 
implications or hazards but is also  economically and socially harmful to the 
smoker, his or her family and society,  in general. Tobacco is really life 
threatening, as it affects the lungs and can  cause cancer, hypertension and other 
heart and respiratory diseases, etc. It can  kill. 
On the economic sphere, to some, spendings on cigarettes do compete  for 
prioritization in the meagre financial resources with other more important  
domestic budgetary areas that sustain the household, such as fish money,  clothing, 
medical bills, schools fees, fares, etc. Spendings on cigarettes do  often 
take a heavy toll on the household budget.
HNB: Do you think the  decision taken by the Foroyaa management can prevent 
its employees from exposure  to second hand Tobacco smoke?
Mr. Ousman Sillah: Yes, I believe it can. This  restriction is not only meant 
to ensure that the employees are protected from  being exposed to second hand 
tobacco smoke but that it is also assisting the  very few  workers in Foroyaa 
who are smokers to quit  smoking. They  are all cooperating and trying to 
eventually stop smoking. These smokers are not  seeing this as a punishment but 
as support measure to help them kick off the  smoking habit.
HNB: Can you comment on smoking in transports which is another  form of 
second Hand Tobacco Smoke to non-smokers?
Mr. Ousman Sillah: Yes, I  think it is possible to stop smoking in public 
transports, e.g buses, vans, etc.  As for me, whenever I board a vehicle and find 
someone smoking or about to light  a cigarette, I would simply and politely 
tell the person to spare us the  discomfort and danger of the pungent smoke in 
the air. And in all cases they  will cooperate and even extend apologies.
HNB: How can we fight against  Tobacco smoke?
Mr. Ousman Sillah: it is a collective struggle to be waged  together by both 
smokers’ and non-smokers, alike. The smokers need the support  of the 
non-smokers to help them to help not only the non-smokers but themselves,  as well.
HNB: Any final message to smokers, Mr. Ousman Sillah?
Ousman  Sillah: I want to share with all smokers the ‘secret formula’ which 
I employed  inorder to stop smoking. You don’t need the intervention of any 
artificial or  magical or supernatural means. All you need is simply the WILL 
POWER which I  believe is within the purview of every smoker’s capacity or 
ability.
This is  how I came up to the decision. First of all, I began by considering 
cigarette  smoking a Life and Death vocation. I counselled myself that it is 
either that I  continue with the artificial pleasure that I derived from 
smoking and shortened  my life or take the seemingly ‘difficult’ decision to quit 
smoking and prolong  my live. 
I have the conviction that since death is an inevitable end it  would be 
cowardly for me to be afraid of it. However, I should also not allow  myself to 
indulge in any act or practice that self-induces death. This, to me,  
tantamounts to committing suicide. Although one can die for a principle or a  worthy 
cause. This is honourable.
What should be unacceptable is to die as a  result of pursuing artificial 
pleasure such as tobacco smoking. It should be  considered as self-defeating and 
a rather a cheap death. 
Your lives are so  precious. Do not trade it with the artificial and temporal 
pleasure that one  derives from tobacco or any other intoxicants, for that 
matter. Preserve your  lives for your children, for society and for posterity.
Smokers can overcome  the stress that leads them to smoking by substituting 
it with other life  preserving pursuits that give genuine and harmless pleasure.
HND: Thank you  for sharing your thoughts with us.
Ousman Sillah: It is a  pleasure.

MARINA HOLDS GRADUATION CEREMONY
By Abdoulie  Dibba
Foroyaa started publishing the speech of Mr. Abdou A.B Njie, who was  the 
guest speaker at the Marina International School graduation ceremony and had  
stopped at where he said “the services and public facilities which the graduands  
continue to enjoy have, in significant ways, been provided by taxes paid by  
various segments of the community”. He said “the congenial, social and 
economic  environment which facilitated peaceful pursuit of their academic and  
professional ambitions have been provided by the citizenry concerned with their  
welfare and progress”. Mr. Njie told the graduands that as they continue to  
climb the ladder of success and progress in life, they should try and do their  
utmost to contribute their own quota to the development and prosperity of 
their  nation.
He said those of them who will encounter failures or some misfortunes  should 
not give up. “Never say fail” should serve as their motto. He said a “BA”  
degree which many of the graduands aspire to acquire, simply means “Begin  
Again.” Forge ahead and embrace the culture of life long learning and that those  
of you who might temporarily fall by the wayside, he said, should muster the  
moral courage and determination to persevere and rise to the challenge. Mr. 
Njie  told the graduands that intellectual achievements do not necessarily 
guarantee  success but that in life, the content of your character is more 
important than  your intellectual prowess; that as Martin Luther King puts it “Your 
attitude  determines your attributes in life,” Attitudes of discipline, 
honesty,  integrity, dedication and self sacrifice” Njie said. 
Mr. Njie pointed out  that another challenge that the graduands will face as 
they move away from the  four walls of the school or homes is the need for 
continued tolerance and  modesty. He said the world is now a global village and 
the capacity to work in a  multi-racial and multi-religious environment is 
imperative. He asserted that an  educated man is a modest man. He or she becomes 
more aware of his or her  limitations and the frontiers of knowledge unexplored 
by him. He told the  graduands that they must respect one another and that 
honouring others is simple  when they sound like you or when they are doing what 
you want. He pointed out  that a person with a sound character is someone who 
puts principle above  personality and country before self. He said it should 
always be service before  self. As late President John F. Kennedy of the US 
put it “Do not ask what your  country can do for you, but ask what you can do 
for your country” Njie said.  
Mr. Njie told the graduands that in our modern world, it is inevitable that  
we will all pursue material well being as a goal, however, he said, let us not 
 in this process make our entire aim in life acquiring and amassing abundant  
material wealth. Let us not  totally sacrifice ethical  values and  character 
which form the foundation of every civilised society to the alter of  greed. 
He told the graduands that today we live in an environment in which  material 
wealth are glorified and character and ethics assigned inferior status;  it is 
an environment in which character is often regarded as merely an adornment  
of society rather than the fundamental and vital element of spiritual well  
being. He then challenged the graduands to put character and ethical values  
above riches. Mr. Njie argued that he has spoken at some length on character  
versus riches because he wished to stress the ethical and intellectual values of  
life rather than material ones. He pointed out that the great material 
progress  that we see in certain parts of the world today has distorted men’s sense 
of  proportion to the extent that material values have usurped the sovereignty 
that  is of the ethical and the spiritual. He said everywhere today, the 
consequences  of perversion of the national order are to be seen. Spirit of mind 
had ceased to  rule, the riches of the world sought and to which it sacrificed 
all else, have  become a curse by their abundance. Mr. Njie told the graduands 
that he is by no  means scorning or under-rating the importance of wealth in 
the contribution of  human welfare, well being and happiness but that his 
concern is that the act of  wealth seeking through the so-called “Rat race” should 
not be achieved at the  expense of good character and ethical values. He 
asserted that he strongly  believes that character not wealth, or power or 
position is of supreme worth. He  told the gradunads that that is one of the 
principles they should apply in their  quest to arrive at their dreamed destination, 
that is the “Land of success”.  
Mr. Njie told the graduands that some of  them  will one day  emerge as 
leaders in our society in one position or the other. He said one of  the challenges 
that will face them is whether their stay at the top can endure  and be 
sustained and ultimately be crowned with success, which will largely  depend on 
true leadership. Mr Njie argued that a leader must not be a “Signpost”  Who 
shows the way but does not follow it. He said effective leadership requires  
demonstration of capacity to inspire and motivate. A leader he said cannot be  
arrogant, dishonest and self-centred, petty and unjust. A leader he said must  
lead by example. He must have a sense of purpose, vision and above all, must be  
genuinely interested in the welfare and development of his or her colleagues 
and  subordinates. Mr. Njie told the graduands that by demonstrating this form 
of  exemplary leadership, they will earn the respect and confidence of their  
subordinates and then their combined efforts, will help to achieve the 
visions,  the goals and objectives of the organisations they will eventually  serve.

HUMAN RIGHTS TRAINING WORKSHOP FOR SECURITY OFFICERS
By Sarjo  Camara Singhateh
Amidu Mansaray, the Global Director of Bajito Onda Africa  Foundation, said 
some African countries have realised that students and law  enforcement 
officers are very important bodies in a nation’s development. He,  however, added 
that they do not, in most cases, know about the existence of the  African 
Children Human and People’s Rights, the Universal Declaration of Human  Rights, the 
Charter on Rights and Welfare of the Children, the Protocol on the  Rights of 
Women in Africa and many other international human rights instruments,  and as 
a result of this fact, they do not know the rights, duties and  
responsibilities of individuals to ensure the protection of everyone’s rights.  Mr. Mansaray 
made this statement at the opening of a two day training workshop  organised 
for officers at the Father Farrel Hall (Westfield), from 3 to 4 July  2007. 
The officers include personnel from the Gambia Police Force, Police  
Intervention Unit, Interpol, NIA, Immigration, Armed Forces and Prisons.
Mr.  Mansaray   said that as dictated by canons of Police ethics, which  
instruct officers to respect the constitutional rights of all people to liberty,  
equality and justice, law enforcement officers are supposed to be the leading  
human rights protectors and promoters everywhere in the world. “Unfortunately 
 law enforcement officers have very little knowledge about human rights” he  
added.
On his part, the Inspector General of Police, Benedict Jammeh, said it  is 
indeed a worthwhile cause to get the involvement of security personnel in  Human 
right Education, as it is the workforce that is directly dealing with the  
people on a daily basis, especially with people who we suspect of committing  
crimes and also those who are victims of crime.
He said acquiring the  principles, concepts and knowledge of human rights 
issues would immensely  prepare and better place them in the execution of their 
duties as law  enforcement officials and as protectors and enforcers of human 
rights. “It is  imperative as security officers, regardless of the outfit we 
belong to, to  understand the basic principles of performing our duties with 
human rights as  the basis for our actions” he noted. He said that based on the 
powers that the  constitution vested on them, they may at times legally limit 
some of the very  fundamental rights of people especially people suspected of 
committing a crime,  for example during arrest, detention, investigations and 
interrogations. He  admitted that they must do their work according to the 
letters of the law.  
Fatou Sowe, the Deputy Director of Social Welfare, stated that while it is  
true that respect for and promotion of human rights is an integral part of  
social development, it is also true that some of our law enforcement officers do  
not know some of the legal instruments they should enforce, especially the  
international instruments which Gambia is a signatory to.
“We must first and  foremost recognise that all human beings are born equal 
and have rights and  dignity to be respected and protected” he noted.
He said every individual is  a holder of rights and our governments are 
accountable for the protection of  these rights.

NIA DIAMOND CASE TO PROCEED TODAY
By Fabakary B.  Ceesay
The protracted criminal case involving the state and the six  ex-officers of 
the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) is expected to continue  today. The 
last sitting did not proceed on the 28 June due to the fact that the  tenth 
prosecution witness (PW10) was not available in court. The matter is  before 
Principal Magistrate Moses Richards of the Kanifing Magistrates’  Court.
The state counsel, A.S Umar told the court that their next witness is  the 
court interpreter Dodou Manneh, who interpreted the document sent by the two  
Germans from German (Deustch) to English. The prosecutor told the court that the 
 witness, Mr. Manneh is busy at the high court. He added that he expects the  
lawyer who presided over the investigation panel into the matter to testify. 
He  therefore asked for an adjournment.
The ex-officers standing trial are Lamin  Drammeh, Kajali Jawara, Basiru 
Jabang, Lamin Sanneh, Fabakary Barrow and  Salimina Drammeh. They were all dragged 
to court by the state and charged with  theft, abuse of office and criminal 
trespass. They were accused of robbing two  German citizens of their properties 
which include, an amount of 205, 000 US  dollars, two cell phones (mobile), 
eight pieces of raw diamond, and a shaving  machine. 

MUSTAPHA LEIGH AND BOTO SONKO IN DOCK
By Fabakary B.  Ceesay
Mr. Mustapha Leigh, the former technical director of works and  
infrastructure and Mr. Momodou Lamin Sonko, alias “Boto,” have appeared before  principal 
magistrate Moses Richards of the Kanifing Magistrates Court on Monday,  2 
July. They were dragged to court by the state and charged with three counts of  
conspiracy, stealing and abuse of office, contrary to section 386, 252 and 90 of 
 criminal code.
Count one stated that the two accused persons in the year  2001, at the 
Department of State for Works conspired together to commit a  felony, i.e, 
stealing, Count two indicates that the two accused in 2001, at  Mansakonko, stole a 
bulldozer being the property of the Gambia Government and  Count three states 
that the first accused person, Mr. Leigh in 2001, being an  employee of the 
public service, allowed the second accused, Mr. Sonko to use a  bulldozer being 
the property of The Gambia Government without authority. They  pleaded not 
guilty. The prosecuting officer, Inspector Bojang, made an  application to the 
court not to grant bail to the accused persons. Inspector  Bojang said they are 
still investigating them and hopes that more charges will  be filed against 
them. He added that if they are bailed, they can tamper with  the investigations. 
The counsel for the second accused person, Lawyer  Antouman Gaye, argued that 
the offences are bailable, adding that the accused  persons are responsible 
persons residing with their families in the country and  that they cannot run 
and leave them behind. He added that bail is a  constitutional right and that 
the accused persons were reporting to the police  on bail since their arrest. 
Magistrate Richards granted them bail in the sum of  D500, 000 each, with two 
Gambian sureties and to deposit title deeds of a landed  property in court. The 
counsel for the first accused person is Mrs. Amina Joof  Conteh. The case is 
adjourned to 16 July.

FORMER PS’s TRIAL DRAGS
By  Fabakary B. Ceesay
The trial involving the Former Permanent Secretary at the  Department of 
State for Works and Infrastructure, Mr. Lamin Sanneh, and the  state did not 
proceed at the Kanifing Magistrates’ Court on Monday, 2 July,  before Magistrate Pa 
Harry Jammeh, due to the fact that the state counsel could  not make it to 
the court.
The defence counsel, Lamin S. Camara, informed the  court that the state cou
nsel, E. O. Fagbenle has called him to suggest another  date for the 
continuation of the case. Camara added that he is comfortable with  the moves of the 
state counsel. 
The defendant, Lamin Sanneh ,was not in  court. Mr Sanneh has been standing 
trial since 3rd April this year.
He was  brought to court by the state for alleged negligence of official 
duties,  contrary to section 113 of the criminal code. The particulars of offence  
indicates that on the 8th and 9th November 2006, Mr. Sanneh neglected to 
report  to office as he was required to do so. He is currently on bail. He has 
spent  almost five months in detention before he was arraigned in court. The case 
 continues on the 9 of July. 

SoS COLLEY HARPS ON THE BRIKAMA CRAFT  MARKET
The Secretary of State for Tourism and Culture, Madam Angela Colley,  said 
that lack of water and electricity in the newly constructed craft market in  
Brikama is the main reason for the delay in the opening of the market. 
Madam  Colley made this statement at the National Assembly while responding 
to a  question raised by the member for Kombo Central, Hon. Abdou F.H.S Jarju,  
regarding the opening of the market. In her reply, SoS Colley indicated that 
the  Brikama craft market was funded by the World Bank Public Works Capacity 
Building  Project at a cost of D6, 000,000 (six million dalasi) and that the 
counterpart  contributions were paid by The Gambia Tourism Authority, the 
Department of State  for Tourism and Culture and the Brikama Area Council to the 
tune of D350,000.00,  D200,000.00, D150,000.00, respectively. She said that the 
contract for the  project was awarded by the GAMWORKS Agency to GAI ENTERPRISE 
in June 2004 and  construction was completed in June 2005.  
The SoS also indicated that  the project consists of 72 stalls, an 
administrative block, training centre,  smith kiosk and weavers shed and that the 
president of the republic inaugurated  the market in July 2005. At the time of 
handing over she said, water and  electricity facilities were outstanding. She 
pointed out that the beneficiaries  agreed to jointly fund the installation of 
water and electrification of the  market during a meeting. The absence of these 
amenities, she said, is the main  reason for the delay in opening the market. 
She however disclosed that the  Brikama Area Council recently negotiated with 
NAWEC to install water and that  the connection was done in March 2007; that 
negotiations between NAWEC and  Brikama Area Council are underway to provide 
electricity; that it is expected  that each stall will be provided with cash 
power metre to ease the problem of  payment of electricity bills and that the cost 
of connection and maintenance  will be borne by individual vendors. 
She concluded by saying that the  Brikama Area Council and The Gambia Tourism 
Authority, in consultation with the  craft market association, are currently 
working out the modalities of relocating  the vendors to the new market.  




************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.


To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]


ATOM RSS1 RSS2