GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lamin Sanyang <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 20 May 2001 09:59:11 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
Yusupha,
Your points have been taken. For those who want to forge a way forward, our
strength lies in not only what we already can, but accepting our weaknesses
and finding ways and means of improving. The opposition should take note of
what you have raised and devise methods of remedying the situation instead
of seeing you as a trouble-shooter. But what does one expect when people are
so bent on screaming instead of doing concrete things? Who is really
interested in rolls of theory when, as a good friend pointed out, all you
have to do is go to www whatever theory.com and you have as many matches as
you want? Once again I need volunteers to free our country. Not paper tigers
or is the word cyber Gorrillaz.Can I count on the most outspoken?
Minos.











>From: Yusupha C Jow <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list
><[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: On The Original Voter Buyout Theory
>Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 21:06:48 EDT
>
>Brother Hamjatta:
>I did not want Yusupha Jow (please note the spelling) to become the central
>point of this debate.  Thus this title as opposed to the rather misleading
>one you chose to use.  I also choose not to bite on the 'charlatanry and
>such' bait. Those are character accusations which simply create unnecessary
>strife. Let's discuss your theory.
>
>Dampha has already withdrawn from his original stance: The 'theory' being
>the
>number one reason for the loss in Kiang and close victory in Baddibou.
>This
>new stance, in my opinion, completely rubbishes his earlier support of it.
>Nevertheless, the colorful adjectives you have used to describe my
>arguments
>are to be expected in lieu of the 'overly thinking alike' mentality which I
>described in my original piece.  It is not necessarily always a bad thing
>except that at times it tends to obscure or bias perfectly reasonable
>opposition to a generally accepted shaky theory (as in this case).  But
>this
>is your prerogative which I shall accept except that I think it is
>perfectly
>reasonable for me to put your original buyout theory to the test since you
>have submitted it in it's entirety.
>
>Unfortunately, I have an appointment in another city this evening and a
>long
>drive awaits me.  So closer scrutiny of your widely accepted voter buyout
>theory will have to wait till tomorrow perhaps.
>
>Have a nice evening!
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
>Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
>You may also send subscription requests to
>[log in to unmask]
>if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to write your
>full name and e-mail address.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
You may also send subscription requests to [log in to unmask]
if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to write your full name and e-mail address.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2