You can buy Baba Galleh Jallow's "Dying For My Daughter" at:

http://freegambia.net/shop.html

===========================================================================

Combating Female Circumcision In US

By Deena Guzder

April 8th, 2007

THE BIG STORY


Ramatoulie Jallow, a cherubic 14-year-old from the Gambia, recently spoke
about her father’s successful struggle to save her from being sent “to the
bush” 10 years ago, where an elder community-woman was waiting to
circumcise her and numerous other Fulani girls.

From 1997 to 1998, Ramatolulie’s father, Baba Jallow, fought his village
elders to save his daughter from the practice he and human rights groups
call "female genital mutilation."  In Jallow’s Gambian village, Farafenni,
the practice is annually performed on as many as 30 young girls, all under
the age of five, reportedly all with the same blade and never with
anesthesia. Other African and Middle Eastern countries also practice such
circumcisions.

Jallow says some girls die each year in Farafenni just from the immediate
shock. “Today, both Ramatoulie and her little sister, Wuri, are growing up
into full, beautiful young ladies,” said Jallow. Jallow has documented his
struggle in his book “Dying for My Daughter” (Wasteland Press, 2004).

Every year, more than one million females are subjected to circumcision, a
long-sustained cultural practice with potentially life-threatening results
accompanied by unspeakable pain and suffering, according to the World
Health Organization. Using recent Census estimates and tracking the
countries where the practice is prevalent, the CDC estimates that there
are thousands of girls and women at risk right here in the US.

People in the medical community are also concerned that immigrants are
perpetuating the tradition in their adopted homelands, according to Dr.
Meridith Sher of Eastside Women’s OB/GYN Center. Sher said she’s seen
15-20 cases in her five-year medical career and has treated women for
long-term complications resulting from the procedure. Data concerning the
practice among immigrants is particularly hard to gather considering most
recent immigrants don’t visit gynecologists on a regular basis and may be
aware of the 1996 U.S. law banning the procedure. While some African
immigrants take their daughters back to their native countries to be
circumcised, others reportedly perform the procedure in the secrecy of
their homes here.

“I think they probably pay the airfare of a practitioner to come here and
perform it in the house, to keep it indoors,” Jallow suggests. He
maintains that many of the circumcised girls are tormented forever. The
practice “dampens women’s spirit and takes the luster out of their eyes,”
he added.

Dr. Harvey Rutstein, a gynecologist who says he’s treated half a dozen
women who underwent the procedure, spoke about the impact. “I don’t think
any of the women wanted it done," because of the trauma, he said. “It has
psychological effects. You’re taking out tissue that belongs in the body.”

Some medical professionals contacted for this story report that,
ironically, criminalization of the procedure here may have forced the
practice underground—they fear some women may not seek medical care
because those who conduct it on the women  risk serving a five-year prison
sentence. Although there have been some documented female circumcision
cases in the United States, none were tried under the existing laws.

Given that health providers increasingly see women with female genital
circumcision, the American college of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is
sending a new clinical manual to every OB/GYN in the country. It includes
slides of circumcised women, information about the history and meaning of
the practice, and the medical consequences and complications.

One of the U.S. organizations leading the effort to eradicate the practice
is a New York-based international women’s right group called Equality Now,
which works to end violence and discrimination against women through the
mobilization of public pressure. Jessica Neuwirth, founder of Equality Now
and a Harvard Law professor believes the practice is taking place in the
U.S. and that "parents are taking their children back to their countries
of origin in Africa to have it done outside the U.S.”

“There’s absolutely nothing that allows a woman in danger of female
genital mutilation to seek help,” in the U.S., added Taina Bien-Aimé, the
executive director of Equality Now. “There’s nowhere for her to turn.”
Noting that women find themselves in overwhelmingly unfamiliar situations
after coming here, Bien-Aimé said, “Social services simply aren’t
available or they’re inept and can’t meet these women’s pressing needs.”
Bien-Aimé spoke favorably of Sweden and the Britain’s approach, where a
social worker is assigned to children at risk and a law forbids removing
such children from their country to have infibulation performed abroad.

While acknowledging female circumcision has cultural significance,
Bien-Aime stressed: “Equality Now approaches female genital mutilation
through more than a health approach; we also see the practice in terms of
a human rights violation. Female genital mutilation causes severe
psychological and physical damage. It violates International Law and the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which ensure bodily integrity.”

Bien-Aimé offered another major reason why the practice continues: Because
“there’s no systematic educational approach. Women are often told it’s
illegal without being taught about the health and humanitarian
repercussions." She also said there is “a severe lack of attention and
funding” to grassroots organizations fighting the practice.

As more and more activists become involved in the cause to curb female
genital mutilation amongst U.S. immigrants, the question of cultural
sensitivity continues surfacing. “It is my strong feeling that the
movement must be led by African activists,” said Neuwirth, the Equality
Now founder.

How do long-held traditions that are harmful fall? Pseudo-medical
documents reveal female genital mutilation was actually performed in the
U.S. during the early 20th century to “cure” women of masturbation,
homosexuality and frigidity. With the progress of research and education,
the practice was eventually discredited and abandoned.

Similarly, girls’ feet are no longer bound in China and widows are less
pressured to throw themselves on funeral pyres in India. At the 1995 U.N.
conference in Beijing, a world that once ignored female “circumcision”
recognized the practice as “violence.”

Global concern also is having impact and some African countries now have
laws against the practice; Eritrea, for example, banned the procedure on
March 31, this year.

And, at the grassroots level where it counts most, there are always those
such Baba Jallow, who are willing to rise from within their communities
–even at the risk of being ostracized— in order to protect a daughter.


-- 
BambaLaye
Radio Free Gambia
www.freegambia.net

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤