Jaw, 
      after receiving SS. Daffeh mail last evening, i
have suggested to him to subscribe to the various
mailing lists in other to participate regularly in the
on going debate rather than just the ALLGAMBIAN.NET
newspaper in a reply i wrote to him. 

These lists are created for the free flow of ideas,
expression and opinion for all Gambians and friends of
The Gambia like the ALLGAMBIAN.NET, i stated..

This is so because i do not have enough time today if
i may say to serve as a moderator or what ever it
would be call.

My/our hands are full with this problem and how we can
solve it and manage to win Jammeh in October 2006,
restore democracy and the rule of law in our dear
mother homeland.

Mballow 



--- Pasamba Jow <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


---------------------------------
[ This e-mail is posted to Gambia|Post e-Gathering by
"Pasamba Jow"  ]
Mballow, why not ask Mr. "Daffeh" to subscribe to the
post and L and send his own postings? Doesn't this man
how to send his own postings to the Allgambianin
instead of having you do it for him?

Coach





---------------------------------

From:  saihou Mballow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:  [log in to unmask]
To:  [log in to unmask], gambia post
<[log in to unmask]>, Gambia List
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:  [>-<] Re: forward: ALLGAMBIAN .NET FOR SS.
DAFFEH
Date:  Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:32:24 -0800 (PST)
>[ This e-mail is posted to Gambia|Post e-Gathering by
saihou Mballow <[log in to unmask]> ]
>
>
>ALLGAMBIAN.NET EDITORIALS
>kINDLY PUBLISH THIS RESPOND FOR SS.DAFFEH. THIS
>RESPOND IS NOT WRITTEN NOR ENDORSED BY ME JUST
>FORWARDING IT FOR PUBLICATION.
>
>
>
>
>--- Radio Free Gambia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Mr. Mballow:
> >
> > Please relay the following to Mr. Daffeh:
> >
> > Mr. Daffeh -
> >
> > Your unfounded generalization of Save the Gambia
> > Democracy Project and by
> > extension all hard working, well meaning Gambians
> > and friends (there are
> > dedicated non-gambians actively pushing for your
> > freedom and dignity
> > through STGDP) in that group and those who
> > contributed their dime, time
> > and hymn to the efforts of STGDP as "having a
hidden
> > agenda that is
> > inimical to UDP..." is absord, childish and hog
wash
> > at best.
> >
> > You owe an apology to each and every one who has
> > contributed to the
> > efforts of STGDP in any small way.
> >
> > Perhaps, you need to be schooled that STGDP is the
> > reason you're writing
> > on this particular issue in the first place. So,
to
> > depict such a group of
> > dedicated individuals and groups in such a manner
> > shows how much you know
> > of the issue at hand.
> >
> > I bet the response you're seeking from Ousainou
and
> > UDP will come through
> > in your dreams. Keep on dreaming..... and catch up
> > with the rest of us at
> > Sate House come October!
> >
> > -BambaLaye
> >
> > On Mon, January 30, 2006 8:29 pm, saihou Mballow
> > said:
> > > DISCLAIMER: THIS ARTICLE WAS NOT WRITTEN NOR
> > ENDORSED
> > > BY ME JUST FORWARDING IT TO THE RIGHT
> > ALLGAMBIAN.NET
> > > EDITORIALS
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > LET’S GET REAL.
> > >
> > >
> > > Mr Editor,
> > >
> > > Let me begin by thanking you for publishing my
> > article
> > > of 22 January 2006, titled ‘Stop the hypocrisy’.
I
> > > must admit it is quite interesting to see the
> > > fascinating debate this article generated in
your
> > > medium. You know, this is fantastic. I have
always
> > > believed that everyone is entitled to his/her
> > opinion.
> > > So, I respect every opinion that has been
> > expressed in
> > > relation to my article. However, the blatant
> > > misrepresentation of certain facts and high
class
> > > premeditated distortions on the part of
Abdoulaye
> > > Saine [I don’t suppose this is Dr Abdoulaye
Saine]
> > and
> > > somebody who calls himself sundiata have
compelled
> > me
> > > to write again.
> > >
> > > Before I begin, let me make it absolutely clear
> > that I
> > > never intent to be objective in my previous
> > article.
> > > My aim was to be subjective to the irrefutable
> > facts
> > > referred to therein, and that is what I
> > consciously
> > > did. So there is no point criticising me for not
> > being
> > > objective. This is not a time for diplomacy. It
is
> > a
> > > time for straight talking, taking the bull by
the
> > > horn, calling a spade a spade and stopping
people
> > from
> > > evading the facts to satisfy/promote their
vicious
> > > hidden conscipiracy theories. Since opinions on
> > the
> > > subject of NADD flagbearer are now polarised,
> > thanks
> > > to the vicious and flirty smearing campaign of
> > whishy
> > > whashy Juwara agents like Pa Nderry Mbaye, they
> > are
> > > not viable as a yardstick for the determination
of
> > > anybody’s eligibility for the position of NADD’s
> > > flagbearer. This is why I proposed we use
> > statistics,
> > > and this is why I consciously backed by article
> > with
> > > statistical facts. So far, and indeed much to my
> > > delight, nobody has come up with anything that
> > tends
> > > to or have the potential of discrediting my
> > claims. I
> > > have said that amongst the NADD contenders,
Lawyer
> > > Ousainou Darboe is the only one with a very
strong
> > and
> > > healthy vote winning record, statistically. That
> > is an
> > > irrefutable fact which anybody can ascertain by
> > > visiting the IEC website or other relevant
> > government
> > > sources both local and foreign. It is on the
basis
> > of
> > > this compelling fact that I believed that
Darboe’s
> > > electoral records are a good foundation for NADD
> > to
> > > build on, and that he is the only one with the
> > best
> > > chance of leading NADD to victory. If anybody
> > finds
> > > this hard to swallow because of hypocrisy and
> > > tribalism, then turf. It is simply a statistical
> > fact,
> > > not just my opinion. I am not saying Darboe
should
> > he
> > > imposed on NADD. I have stated my reasons for
> > saying
> > > what I have said, and I will stand by my
> > statements
> > > regardless of what anybody said.
> > >
> > > Abdoulaye Saine, in his article, ‘This is not
the
> > time
> > > for Darboe to Break-away under a UDP banner’,
> > stated
> > > that Oj’s selection, as a presidential
candidate,
> > > cannot be contested on grounds of his
> > electability. I
> > > don’t think he mean to say this or he is
> > completely
> > > ignorant of what NADD’s Memorandum of
> > Understanding
> > > contains. Plainly speaking, it is completely
> > deceitful
> > > and absurd for anybody to say, at this point,
that
> > OJ
> > > had been selected to lead NADD. He had only been
> > > nominated just like Halifa and Mr Darboe. The
> > process
> > > of selection is still ongoing. According to the
> > MOU,
> > > the selection procedure should be aimed at
> > producing
> > > an electable/sellable candidate. Again,
according
> > to
> > > the MOU, any such candidate must earn the
> > unanimous
> > > approval of all constituent parties, not
> > individual
> > > members of NADD executive. So what is the fuss
> > about
> > > Lawyer Darboe having to consult his party before
> > > adding his voice to anybody’s nomination? He
does
> > not
> > > own the UDP, and it is not within his margin of
> > > appreciation to decide for the UDP on such a
very
> > > important and delicate matter. That is why it is
> > not
> > > left to him to decide. Despite being the leader,
> > > Darboe can only make decisions on matters that
> > fall
> > > within his purview, not just any issue. On the
> > basis
> > > of sound advise, he can, for example, concede
> > election
> > > defeat if he believes the opponent’s lead is
> > > insurm

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤