Edi, 

I read a piece this evening, but I am not sure whether you wrote it or am I also "illusionising?". Will you please clarify or expound on the following phrases below:
"Moreover it will help other government which we all are praying for to focus on. Jammeh must go I agreed but are we thinking of the aftermath? hell NO. (What do you mean?)

"YES, the political situation in the Gambia sucks...." ( Sucks of what?) 

"If we wanted to get rid of Jammeh,....." (Since when is it a hypothesis?)

"If we wanted to get rid of Jammeh, It will not be posible without the help of the internation organisation who on one hand, can pressurise the regim to hold free and fair election. Therefore how to make this process happen should be our target than hauling on unnecessary small talk without fruit." (What fruit? Kaba, Tol, Solom-Solom or what?)

"I am not illusionising here as some might thing, but it is obvious that i will never engage in idiotic arguments due to the my self esteem." (Who thinks that you are "illusionising"?)



I am somewhat stupefied by your new stance,  because I thought a leopard can never change its spots.

Prince Coker

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------