Daffeh,
Let me get this CLEAR, are you speaking for Mr. Darboe or
these are Mr. Darboe's words?
Farang.
-----Original Message-----
From: UDP United Kingdom <[log in to unmask]>
To: GAMBIA-L <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Mon, May 20, 2013 6:50 pm
Subject: CLEAR THE AIR.
Sanyang,
Thanks for your observation.
There is no need to make any fuss about this. Mr. Darboe did not say
he will make Mr. Bah leader by just deciding to do so and that is it.
There is a democratic process mechanism in place for electing a UDP
leader, and Mr. Darboe himself have had to go through that to
become/remain leader. This is already an established culture in the UDP
which everybody including those who are not associated with the party,
understands. So if an amateurish journalist chose to misrepresent Mr.
Darboe's statement for malicious purposes, we do not have anything to
worry about that for it only pushes the credibility and integrity of
that journalist and the medium he serves down the drains.
People have already asked themselves this question; ' If Mr. Darboe
himself had to be chosen through a democratic process, why would he not
want someone else to go through the same process?' They then threw
scorn on this classless report and moved on with their lives. I
recommend the same to you.
Mr. Darboe may not have the power to hand pick a successor as you
rightly alluded to, but he certainly have the right to recommend or
nominate one to the party congress and even campaign for him/her, using
all his political skills and influence for he (Darboe) too is a member
of the party just like you (purportedly).
Yes, Mr. Darboe have had to address, not clarify because the statement
did not originate from the UDP or Mr. Darboe, some rumours pertaining
to Mai Fatty but that issue was responsibly reported and by a
responsible medium whereas this one is not nor was it reported by a
responsible and ethical medium. It therefore deserves no response or
clarification either from Mr. Darboe or the UDP. Its simply just that;
junk journalism.
Thanks
Daffeh
On Monday, 20 May 2013, Edrissa S. Sanyang
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> ble Disclaimer: I an neither parsing Mr. Darboe words
or
> suggesting Freedom Newspaper online is wrong; hence the need to
clear
> the air.
>
> The leader; Mr. Darboe of the United Democratic Party of The
Gambia of
> which I am a founder member and a card carrying member (formerly
> Assistant Administrative Secretary) needs to clear the air from
what is
> reported on Freedom newspaper Online by Editor and Publisher Mr.
Mbai.
> Mr. Darboe in one of his speeches at the Raleigh Conference did
make
> reference to a meeting between him; Deputy party leader Yaya
Jallow and
> Mr. Hamat Bah of the NRP where Mr. Darboe suggested to Mr. Bah to
bring
> along the NRP and to join the UDP with the understanding that
since he
> Darboe and two other older members of the leadership (Sanneh and
> Jammeh) are aging Bah could then assume leadership of the reformed
> Party (UDP/NRP) the 'New UDP'. According to Mr. Mbai, 'he (Mr.
Bah) can
> take over the mantle from him' (Mr. Darboe). I am concern here for
two
> reasons:
> 1. This is the second time under one year that
such
> issue is being floated in the print media. The first was in the
> instance of Mr. Mai Fatty of the GMC in the Standard Newspaper and
the
> Party leader Mr. Darboe had to clarify what he said. So the need to
> clear the air once and for all times, obligates Mr. Darboe to make
> reference to the Constitution of the Party in terms of succession
and
> that he would abide by that. Mr. Darboe is an astute Lawyer and
one who
> carefully chooses his words; so out of respect for other Party
Members
> myself included, Mr. Darboe Please Clear the Air. As a party member
> yourself I am not suggesting to take away your right to endorsed
> whosesoever you prefer under transparent and fair process. We the
> members of the UDP need to be clear that the process will be seen
to be
> just that; since that augurs well for the standing of the Party-
the
> IDEALS of Democracy, my second point.
>
> The United Democratic Party need to be seen to
be
> DIFFERENT from ALL Parties that existed before and after its
founding
> in The Gambia because of the Nature, Circumstance and Experience
of its
> founding. YES INDEED; THOSE WERE VERY DIFFICULT AND TRYING TIMES,
BUT
> WE PREVAILED AND PERSEVERED SO THE UNITED DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS
EXISTING
> TODAY, WE CANNOT FORGET THAT. The convictions and sacrifice of
> Countless Pioneers and Soldiers of the
> Cause made the party (some of those belong to the ages) but the
ones
> with us must and should have a say to the
> positions of leadership of the party.
>
> 2. By virtue of the Position of the UDP in the
> political process of The Gambia it should Lead by example
> with what is termed in the Culture of Democracy- Internal
Democracy.
> The showcasing of democratic culture within the
> party organization before GOVERNANCE, call it a nursery bed of the
> practices and processes before governance. For too
> often we have seen in African politics and The Gambia is no
exception
> where the politics of patronage takes precedence over
> Internal Democracy and since Senegal is a reference point Pope Sopi
> (WADE) comes to mind. In the Way Forward for The Gambia
> these processes have to be inbuilt within party structures to
prevent
> jammeh type scenario upon assumption of power by any party or
> individual. Now is the time to address these issues for once power
is
> assumed the often reference cliche ' power corrupts, absolute
> power.....absolutely'. Let me be clear here and crystal clear; I
know
> Mr. Darboe probably more than most having worked with him on close
> quarters
> at very trying times and he would vouch for my respect for him. I
also
> know him to be democratic in his dealings.
> Notwithstanding the Matters of Politics and Country requires
Candor as
> Mr. Darboe himself alluded to in Raleigh.
> He also knows me for speaking my mind and my upbringing dictates my
> respect for all.
>
> Farang.
>
> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
> To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the
Gambia-L Web interface
> at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>
> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
> To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
> [log in to unmask]
> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤To
unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interfaceat: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-lTo contact
the List Management, please send an e-mail
to:[log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
|
