Culled from The Independent of UK
Is the news just a matter of opinion?
Too often, what passes for reporting is intended to discredit prominent
individuals. The Foreign Office minister Denis MacShane warns against
advocacy journalism
25 June 2002
The must-read for political journalists in the US is the new book by David
Brock called Blinded by the Right:The Conscience of an ex-Conservative.
Brock was the star of the conservative media in the 1990s for his reports
about the White House, claiming endless illegal or corrupt deeds and
non-stop abuse of power by the Clintons.
Many of Brock's stories about the Clintons were relayed in Britain by
right-wing papers, such asThe Daily Telegraph and The Spectator. Now Mr
Brock reveals that his stories were lies, half-truths and innuendos designed
to destroy Clinton's presidency. The Republican right used journalism to
destroy Democrat politicians. Brock was given documents or introduced to
"witnesses" who were paid by right-wing powerbrokers, who refused to accept
the legitimacy of a non-conservative government. He describes how his copy
was carefully sub-edited so that it appeared to be truth-seeking reporting,
mixing fact and allegation in easy-to-read narratives.
That the former US president and his wife provided ammunition by their
behaviour, decisions or statements for legitimate criticism was not the
issue. Brock was the chosen vehicle for the daily discrediting of elected
politicians.
Are these techniques now crossing the Atlantic? Traditionally, we have
reporters on news pages and commentators on the op-ed pages. Now we can turn
to a news page in many of our papers and find opinion-laden articles that
tell us what the journalist thinks, rather than facts and quotes attributed
to a named source.
As David Brock's book argues, we now have, in addition to reporting
journalists and comment journalists, a new third category – advocacy
journalists. They are out not to find truth, but to destroy opponents. The
complex nuances of grown-up government are too boring for them. They cannot
be bothered to report Commons debates or get on-the-record quotes.
The advocacy journalists – right and left – are hostile to a Labour
government, old or new. Advocacy journalism now predominates in our tabloids
and increasingly in our broadsheets. We do not have a tradition of
discussant journalism such as one sees in The New York Times, or in Europe
in El Pais or Le Nouvel Observateur. Westminster political journalism is
increasingly dominated by the fox-hunting tendency, which wants to see its
quarry torn to shreds and humiliated in public.
How many ministerial heads need to be up in a trophy room before the public
tires of the sport? Is there no other way to chastise those politicians who
deserve it? Is it possible to discuss issues of state with room for opposing
views, but without personal abuse or allegations of improper motives?
New Labour cannot be pious. We enjoyed advocacy journalism when it hurt John
Major. But revolutions always devour their children. The application of
"spin" has turned back to gouge holes in its Labour creators. But when
Alastair Campbell was writing as an advocacy journalist, at least the
Conservatives had a phalanx of loyal Tory papers to rely on. Now the once-
Labour papers, such as the Daily Mirror, use advocacy journalism to play in
the same anti-Labour team as the Mail and Telegraph. The Government has made
mistakes, but Labour enjoys a clear democratic mandate and presides over one
of the more successful eras in recent British history.
The best way for Labour to see off the current onslaughts of advocacy
journalism is to pray that the Conservatives become a serious party again.
Unlike the broad pro-Euro centrism of the parties of the right in France,
Spain and Germany, the hard-right policies of the British Tories render them
unelectable. And political nature, abhorring a vacuum, fills it with
advocacy journalism. A moderate, post-Thatcherite Conservative Party would
give Labour a political run for its money by filling the news pages with
argument and policy.
Meanwhile, the Government should govern. In the end, advocacy journalism
self-destructs, as editors who want to govern the country make fools of
themselves, just as politicians who believe they have a right to decide what
goes on the front page end up out of office.
Denis MacShane is the Labour MP for Rotherham and a minister at the Foreign
Office. He is a former president of the National Union of Journalists
There is a time in the life of every problem when it is big enough to see,
yet small enough to solve. -Mike- Levitt-
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
