Folks  GOLO-DUBAYE-EG (A monkey can never stop climbing) So is Bush
again denying his crimes.

Fye.

Bush tells Washington Post he is not accountable for Iraq war lies

By Patrick Martin
19 January 2005

In an interview published Sunday with the Washington Post, President
George W. Bush defended his administration against charges that the
rationale for its war with Iraq had proven false, and claimed that the
2004 presidential election constituted an endorsement of his war
policies by the American people.

Bush spoke a few days after the Post revealed that the US military had
halted all efforts to search Iraq for weapons of mass destruction—the
principal pretext for the unprovoked US invasion of March 2003. After
more than 18 months of fruitless effort, in which no evidence of
biological, chemical or nuclear weapons was found, the Iraq Survey
Group (ISG) was disbanded last month and its 1,000-strong cadre of
weapons experts and military intelligence personnel redeployed to
fight the anti-US insurgency.

ISG leader Charles Duelfer is in Washington, preparing his final
accounting, which will not differ greatly from the preliminary report
issued in October, in which he concluded that Iraq had dismantled its
weapons of mass destruction after the 1991 Persian Gulf War and never
reconstituted them.

Meanwhile, the National Intelligence Council, the center for analysis
for 16 US military and civilian intelligence-gathering organizations,
has issued a report on global threats to US security noting that Al
Qaeda's presence in Iraq is far stronger today than it was before the
US invasion that overthrew the regime of Saddam Hussein. Alleged ties
between the Iraqi Ba'athist regime and Osama bin Laden were the other
main pretext for the US invasion, but no evidence has been found to
substantiate this claim either.

Two Post reporters asked Bush about the refutation of his prewar
claims about Iraq. The exchange went as follows:

Post: In Iraq, there's been a steady stream of surprises. We weren't
welcomed as liberators, as Vice President Cheney had talked about. We
haven't found the weapons of mass destruction as predicted. The
postwar process hasn't gone as well as some had hoped. Why hasn't
anyone been held accountable, either through firings or demotions, for
what some people see as mistakes or misjudgments?

Bush: Well, we had an accountability moment, and that's called the
2004 election. And the American people listened to different
assessments made about what was taking place in Iraq, and they looked
at the two candidates, and chose me, for which I'm grateful.

With these remarks, Bush grossly distorts the real content of the 2004
election campaign, and provides a revealing glimpse of his hostility
to elementary democratic principles.

The 2004 election campaign did not offer the American people a real
choice on Iraq, since the candidates nominated by the two big business
parties—which exercise a virtual monopoly over official political
life—both supported the war. The Democrat, Kerry, voted in the Senate
in October 2002 to give Bush the authority to go to war, endorsed the
subsequent conquest of Iraq, and called for the US occupation to
continue more or less indefinitely.

While attempting from time to time to profit politically from antiwar
sentiment, Kerry's criticisms of Bush were always made from the
standpoint of putting himself forward as a more effective
commander-in-chief, who regarded military victory in Iraq over the
popular insurgency as essential to the interests of American
imperialism. In one of the presidential debates, Kerry declared
explicitly that his policy in Iraq was "not about leaving, but about
winning."

Kerry was installed as the Democratic nominee through a well-organized
blitz by the media and the party establishment in January 2004 to
derail then-frontrunner Howard Dean, regarded as too closely aligned
with antiwar sentiment. From the time he became the acknowledged
frontrunner, Kerry worked persistently to prevent the election from
becoming a referendum on the war. The Democrats turned the nominating
convention into a celebration of militarism, with generals and Vietnam
veterans mounting the platform for repeated tributes to Kerry's war
record.

The result: there was no choice between the two bourgeois candidates
when it came to the war in Iraq. The antiwar majority in the United
States was politically disenfranchised.

Bush's claim that the 2004 election constitutes a mandate for the war
reveals his contempt for any genuine democratic debate or popular
control over government policy. Moreover, the claim that November 2,
2004 was his "moment of accountability" suggests a conception of the
presidency that has more in common with an elective dictatorship than
a democracy.

According to Bush, there is only one day out of what may be eight
years in the White House when he can be held accountable to the
American people. Every other day he acts with impunity, exercising the
unreviewable and virtually unlimited powers of the
"commander-in-chief." (According to memos drafted under the
supervision of Alberto Gonzales, his nominee for attorney general,
these powers include the absolute right of the president to order
actions that violate international law, such as the torture of POWs).

According to traditional constitutional norms in the United States,
the president is not an absolute monarch restricted only by
quadrennial elections and a two-term limit. He functions under a
system of checks and balances, with two co-equal branches of
government, legislative and judicial, exercising independent powers of
their own. His role as commander-in-chief—of the armed forces only,
not of the country or its people—signifies the supremacy of the
civilian authority over the military, not the supremacy of the
president over the population.

So complete is the decay of democratic norms in America that the
description above, an ABC of civics classes three decades ago, is
largely forgotten. The one bourgeois political figure who still
occasionally cites such constitutional limitations on presidential
power, Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, is generally regarded in
Washington as an octogenarian eccentric. The entire political
establishment echoes the infamous declaration of former Democratic
Vice President Al Gore after September 11, 2001, that Bush is his
commander-in-chief too.

In the Washington of 2005, checks and balances are a thing of the
past. The judicial branch, packed with right-wing loyalists, was
responsible for elevating Bush into the White House in the first
place. The Republican majority in Congress exercises no supervision or
restraint over the Bush administration, while the Democratic minority
goes along with only the mildest and most impotent of protests. The
Bush administration pushes ahead with measures known to be widely
unpopular, both in domestic and foreign policy, without regard to
public opinion.

There is one final aspect to Bush's remarks on "accountability." It
amounts to an attempt to saddle the American people with the
responsibility for his own criminal actions. By Bush's account, the
American people decided on November 2, 2004 that the absence of
weapons of mass destruction and the lack of any significant ties
between Iraq and Al Qaeda did not matter. They embraced the conquest
of Iraq anyway, and gave their support to an administration determined
to continue the military occupation indefinitely.

One can, of course, deplore the fact that many ordinary working class
and middle class Americans do not yet grasp the enormity of the crime
committed by the Bush administration in March 2003 and continuing to
this day. But it must be added that millions of Americans did seek to
oppose the war, even before it began, joining with tens of millions
around the world in massive demonstrations in February of 2003.

Millions continue to oppose the war, despite the incessant propaganda
of the mass media and the entire US political establishment. In the
wake of the election, opinion polls reveal a further growth of antiwar
sentiment, with 58 percent opposing Bush's handling of the war in
Iraq, and a sizeable minority now supporting immediate withdrawal of
all American troops. Large majorities agree that the pretexts given
for the war—WMD and Iraq's supposed ties to Al Qaeda—were bogus.

Even among those who have been confused by the Bush administration's
presentation of the war in Iraq as a response to the terrorist attacks
of September 11, there is growing opposition to the occupation and the
continued death toll among both American soldiers and the Iraqi
people.

The war in Iraq is a monstrous crime, and Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld & Co.
must be held accountable. They do have co-conspirators, not among the
working people of the United States, but in the American ruling class.
Corporate America and the media and political establishment share the
responsibility for a war in which nearly 1,400 Americans and tens of
thousands of Iraqis have already died.

Those implicated in the war against the people of Iraq must be brought
to justice in war crimes trials which will mete out the appropriate
punishment, not only to those who took the lead in planning and
organizing the war, but those who acted as its propaganda mouthpieces,
those who served as its political enablers, and those whose
corporations profited enormously and continue to profit from the war.

There is one essential precondition in the struggle to accomplish
this: the American working class must break out of the political
straitjacket of the two-party system, establish its political
independence, and link its efforts to those of the working class
throughout the world, in a common fight against imperialism and war.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright 1998-2004
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤